The Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher Is Dead

Margaret Thatcher is Dead.

cnn thatcherSo, Margaret Thatcher is dead. This, perhaps not unexpected end to the once Iron Lady has seen an astonishing out pouring of grief and sycophantic drivel in the main stream media. Although I really had a chuckle to myself when CNN didn’t quite get it right and flashed up an image of her with best buddy and long time Christmas house guest, Sir Jimmy Savile. That was either an example of just how stupid they are, or perhaps how clever, who knows.

Although it is nice to see the shot of them supporting the NSPCC again, keep up the good work Chris, “don’t cha know”.

There is no doubt that Thatcher was a great politician, but that in no ways infers that she was a great person. Politicians are masters at manipulation and control, and Thatcher was one of the best.

She always said that one of her greatest successes was Tony Blair, and it is true that she and her Globalist led policies paved the way for the “New Labour” machine of Mandelson, Blair and Brown to destroy this great nation.
It would be wrong and hypocritical of me not to confess that I was once a supporter of Thatcher. She seemed to have a lot going for her. Having lived through the Heath “3 day week” era, another spell of Wilson, and then the disastrous Callaghan, Thatcher appeared to be the leader to pull the UK out of total devastation.

She openly despised Edward Heath, appeared to be more Euro Skeptic than pro Europe, remember the spats with Jacques Delors, and on the surface put the Grate back into Britain.

thatcherHowever, when you look at her more closely, you realise that she was no different to any of this type of controlled pseudo leader, serving her masters very effectively, until she out lived her usefulness.

She broke the unions power, for no other reason than they were the only opposition and stumbling block to the bankers plans for total takeover. Continuing with her Hayekian template, she embarked on a program of privatisation, sold to us as a way for the man in the street to own shares in the utility companies, but which was in truth nothing more than a way to hand over control of essential services like gas and electricity supply to the global control system.

At no time should any essential service be in the hands of profit seeking giant corporations.  How the hell did they get away with privatising water in this country? Will someone please tell me where the competition is?

British Steel, British Petroleum, Rolls Royce, British Airways where all sold off, just look at them now.

But, and even more worrying, behind the scenes there was a much darker side to her. When you consider that all of this was put in place by a government embroiled in paedophile cover ups, with some very dubious characters on the fringes, i.e. Jimmy Savile. Her cabinet was awash with some really perverted people. When you understand the truth that Icke has been saying for years, that Governments are controlled by blackmail, paedophilia being part the cement that holds it all together, you start to understand how it all works, and why so many perverted creatures have such high places in public office.

So, although Thatcher publicly despised known paedpohile Heath, and also appeared to reject his pro Europe approach, she played her own massive part in the long planned  destruction of UK plc. She famously rejected any talk of the UK taking part in the joint Euro currency nonsense, why? Again, she used the keep the British pound argument to her advantage, while all along, the UK was never going to be part of the Euro, with the City of London needing to be kept well away away from it.

Her successor, John Major-Ball, was a bit part player, just to keep things ticking over while the three horsemen of the Apocalypse, prepared for the end game of New Labour, once John Smith was out of the way.

The UK and of course most of the rest of the world is now totally under the control of the global banking families. World War II was the major trigger to bring about the creation of Israel, and the UN. Every Prime Minister since the “Rothschild friend” Churchill has played their part in the treasonable take over of our country, and who is the one continuity figure that links them all together? Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, 60 glorious years, god bless her.

So, Thatcher is dead, but she will live on forever, for better or worse.

This cartoon by Gerald Scarfe wasn’t thought of as bad taste when first published, so it seem the right time to show it again.

thatcherhanging2

Advertisements

Former Church of England priest and retired organist face jail for sexually abusing boys as young as 10.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3: And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Genesis-1-1
4: And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5: And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6: And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7: And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8: And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9: And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
10: And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
11: And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12: And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13: And the evening and the morning were the third day.
14: And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16: And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17: And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18: And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
19: And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
20: And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21: And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22: And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23: And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25: And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30: And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

OK that’s enough, we all know about the Sabbath day, but it does seem like a plan doesn’t it. light and dark, food, water, seeds, fruit, trees, man and woman, W.T.G  god.

But then man created religion, and it all goes tits up, because regional creates pervert priests, vicars and organists, who can’t keep their dirty hands off of little boys.

I really can’t be bothered writing about  Father Keith Wilkie Denford, 78, and Michael Mytton, 69, read more here:

Mick Philpott is Not The Problem But a Symptom Of The Corrupt System.

I was really trying hard not to add my opinions to the grotesque Philpott saga, but the intervention of multi-millionaire George (Tory Toff) Osborne has forced me to break my silence.

We rightly live in a welfare state. There has to be a reasonable, lifestyle for everyone, including those who for whatever reason cannot work. But this must come with some provisos. Firstly no one should be better off by not working. Regardless of how the levels are set, supporting yourself and your family should always be the top priority. Everyone in employment should always earn more than everyone not employed.

Philpott
The authorities who control this should man up and stop taking the soft option. At the moment, genuine people who need help have to jump through hoops to get anywhere. Because they are almost certainly not professional scroungers, they don’t know how to play the system, and are an easy target for the officious jobs worth’s to fob off. Whereas the odious scumbags like Philpott ride rough shot over these people intimidating them into getting whatever they want.

Now you may not like me saying this, but every town across the country has their own versions of Philpott, the type of family you just wouldn’t want to live next door to. The Police take a “Softly Softly” approach at best, and simply ignore them at worst. They absolutely think they are untouchable producing generation after generation of a sort of underclass of professional scroungers, who truly believe that life is about how much you can con out of the rest of us.

Never ever should bringing a new life into the world be about earning more benefit money. Where the hell has personal responsibility gone? Having said that, also not being able to work should not be a reason for to stop people having a family, but there should be a natural regulation here. A new kid should not equate to an iPhone, sorry but it’s true.

So why has Osborne annoyed me. Well, to use this awful tragedy to justify a political end is simply appalling. Whether you agree with reforming the benefits system or not, you simply cannot look into the eyes of six dead children and effectively say “I told you so”. Let’s also start reforming the sponging parasites who are professional scroungers by making a career in politics, lining their pockets with our money, while doing their masters bidding, and then going off to be peace envoys and / or advisers to leading global banks raking in hundreds of millions of pounds while the rest of us suffer as a result of their “New Labour” policies. Was that a dig at Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, you bet your sweet “importunity in a public toilet with another male” it was.

Again, this is going to upset some people, but yes, I do believe the welfare system needs reforming, it is simply wrong that vile creatures like Philpott can get away with this for so long, and remember, as I said earlier, he is not alone, they are all over the place bleeding us dry. But for every scumbag at the bottom of the pile bleeding us dry, there is an equal and opposite scumbag at the top of the pile doing it as well, but in a much bigger and more lavish way, starting with the Royal Family down.

It’s not just the welfare state that needs reforming, but the whole system from top to bottom. Society in the UK is at the point of collapse. We have been taken over by the global elite, who have instigated the slow kill decline that we are now living through. Things can never get better, the likes of Cameron and the rest of them cannot and have no intention of saving us. They control our money supply, just look at Cyprus, our food, energy, health service, media, in fact everything, and if we don’t change things soon, it will be too late.

So in conclusion, yes, Philpott is a vile creature who deserves everything coming to him, but he is not the problem. He is a symptom of the corrupt broken system we have allowed to take over, while we sit and watch xFactor.

Phew, I managed to get through that without mentioning Iain Duncan Smith, ex Tory leader who lives rent free in a multi-million pound home. Do MP’s have to take the hypocrite (ic) oath?

Who Owns The Bank Of England

I have absolutely no guilt re-blogging someone else’s work if the content is important. This was published in the Tap Blog in February and needs as much exposure as possible.

Thanks Tap, keep up the good work.

Who Owns The Bank Of England?

“The essence of the contemporary monetary system is creation of money,out of nothing, by private banks”Martin Wolf,Financial Times,9th November 2010. quoted by http://www.positivemoney.org.ukLATEST UPDATE – banks directors named

You ask the question, Who Owns The Bank Of England? to one thousand Britons, and I kid you not, all of them will say that it is owned by the Government.

They would be wrong.

The Bank Of England was originally a private bank, which contracted to lend money to the British Government in a financial crisis. It was privately owned at its foundation and remained so until the post-war Labour government nationalised it in 1946.

So it is owned by the government?

No.

Here is how Wikipedia explains it.

 

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.

In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson’s buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know.

But what would surprise everybody is that the Bank Of England, which is entitled to issue cash, then lend it and charge interest to the government, is still essentially a private business.

What would also surprise people is so is the Federal Reserve of America a privately owned bank, and all central banks of the world, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland, which is the Central Banks’ clearing house.

(For a history of central banking – http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2010/12/remember-1920s-easy-loans-big-debts.html)

If the One World Government actually had an address, this would be part of it – the B.I.S, another privately owned bank, the central bankers’ central bank, beyond the control of democracy or government, able to influence events secretly from behind the scenes. One thing is for sure is that in times of financial crisis, these central banking networks become supremely powerful, as those like Gordon Brown allow their countries to become effectively indebted to the point of loss of control.

The people wielding this power see the world’s financial crisis as their moment of opportunity to seize greater power. The scary part of that is that hardly a living soul even knows they exist. Now that’s real power.

What’s all this about?

Professor Carroll Quigley wrote a book on who ruled the the USA and Britain between 1870 and 1960, called Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.  His publisher MacMillan, was taken over as they first published his book, and the plates and the manuscript were destroyed.  But not before a handful of them had been sold.  In this book, Professor Quigley wrote  –

The power of the Bank Of England and of its governor was admitted by most qualified observers.  In January 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been Chancellor Of The Exchequer in 1915-1916, as Chairman of the Board of The Midland Bank, told its stockholder:”I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow in their hands the destiny of the people.”

 

 

Quigley also wrote –

..the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”

 

 

Another book continues the story, Secret Records Revealed  by Dr Dennis Cuddy –

On August 5th 1995, the New York Times published an article by Keith Bradsher, in which he wrote –

In a small Swiss city sits an international organisation so obscure and secretive…Control of the institution, the Bank for International Settlements, lies with some of the world’s most powerful and least visible men: the heads of thirty-two central banks, officials able to shift billions of dollars at the stroke of a pen.”

 

 

On June 28th 1998, The Washington Post published an article about the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) titled, “At Secret Meetings in Switzerland, 13 people shape the world’s economy”, which described these individuals as “this economic cabal…this secretive group…the financial barons who control the world’s supply of money.”

 

 

Quigley again –

Each Central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

 

 

They are not all Jewish by the way.

Dr Stan Monteith in The Brotherhood Of Darkness (Anomolos) writes –

Anti-Semitism is a smokescreen created to conceal the identity of the true enemy.

 

 

He explains that the objective of the secretive groups is to bring about the surrender of sovereignty and of national independence.

THE BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

The Bank of England has played a prominent role in American history — without it, the United States would not exist.

The American colonists considered themselves loyal Englishmen to a man, but when they began to enjoy unequalled prosperity by printing and circulating their own Colonial scrip, the stockholders of the Bank of England went to George III and informed him that their monopoly of interest-bearing notes in the colonies was at stake. He banned the scrip, with the result that there was an immediate depression in the commercial life of the Americas. This was the cause of the Rebellion; as Benjamin Franklin pointed out, the little tax on tea, amounting to about a dollar a year per American family, could have been borne, but the colonists could not survive the banning of their own money.

Early descriptions of the shareholders of the Bank of England identify them as “a Society of about 1300 persons”. They included the King and Queen of England, who received shares to the value of 10,000 pounds each; Marlborough, who invested 10,000 pounds — he also invested large sums from his “commissions” in the East India Co. in 1697, and later became Governor of the Hudson Bay Company, which paid a 75% dividend; Lord Shrewsbury, who invested 10,000 pounds; Godolphin, who invested 7000 pounds — he predicted that the Bank of England would not only finance trade, but would carry the burden of her wars, which was proven true in the next three hundred years. Virginia Cowles writes, in “The Great Marlborough”: “England emerged from the war as the dominant force, because the Bank of England’s credit system enabled her to bear the burden of war without undue strain.”

WASP

FACTS ABOUT BANK OF ENGLAND

EXTRACT –

The Bank of England and the Rothschilds continued to play a dominant role in the commercial life of the United States, causing panics and depressions for the Rothschilds whenever their officials were instructed to do so. When the Second Bank of the United States expired in 1836, and President Jackson refused to renew it, [thus] creating great prosperity in the United States when government funds were deposited in other banks, the Rothschilds punished the upstarts by causing the Panic of 1837. As Henry Clews writes in “Twenty-Eight Years on Wall Street”, p. 157: “The Panic of 1837 was aggravated by the Bank of England when it in one day threw out all the paper connected with the United States.”

By refusing to credit American notes and stocks, the Bank of England created financial panic among the holders of that paper. The panic enabled Rothschild’s agents, Peabody and Belmont, to reap a fortune in buying up depreciated stocks during the panic.

The Bank of England has played a prominent role in wars, revolutions, and espionage, as well as business panics. When Napoleon escaped from Elba in 1815, the London gold market jumped overnight from 4lb.6d to 5lb.7d. The leading buyer was Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who was under orders from the British Treasury to dispatch gold to the Duke of Wellington, grouping to stop Napoleon. After Waterloo, the price of gold dropped.

During the twentieth century, the most important name at the Bank of England was Lord Montagu Norman. His grandfather, George Warde Norman, had been governor of the Bank of England from 1821-1872, longer than any other man; his other grandfather, Lord Collet, was Governor of the Bank of England from 1887-89, and managing partner of Brown Shipley Co. in London for twenty-five years.

In 1894, Montague Norman was sent to New York to work in the offices of Brown Brothers; he was befriended by the W.A. Delano family, and lived with the Markoe family, partners of Brown Bros. In 1907, Norman was elected to the Court of the Bank of England. In 1912, he had a severe nervous breakdown, and was treated by [Carl] Jung in Switzerland. He became deputy governor of the Bank of England in 1916, and later served until 1944 as Governor. The Wall Street Journal wrote of him in 1927:

“Mr. M. Collet Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England, is now head and shoulders above all other British bankers. No other British banker has ever been as independent and supreme in the world of British finance as Mr. Norman is today. He has just been elected Governor for the eighth year in succession. Before the war, no Governor was allowed to hold office for more than two years; but Mr. Norman has broken all precedents. He runs his Bank and his Treasury as well. He appears to have no associations except his employees. He gives no interviews. He leaves the British financial world wholly in the thick as to his plans and ideas.”

above from WASP
EARLY DAY MOTION from AUSTEN MITCHELL

Early day motion 1297

Print version

ENFORCEMENT OF BANK OF ENGLAND ACT 1694

Session: 2008-09

Date tabled: 20.04.2009

Primary sponsor: Mitchell, Austin

Sponsors: Cohen, Harry Cryer, Ann Illsley, Eric McDonnell, John Taylor, David

That this House, observing that the intention of the founding Act of the Bank of England in 1694 was `that their Majesties’ subjects may not be oppressed by the said corporation’, notes that those subjects have been seriously oppressed by the Bank’s failure to control the greed, risk-taking and speculation of the banking system over which it presides; and therefore suggests that this oppression should be dealt with as the Act provides by fines three times the value of the abusive trading.

ENDS

As a hundred years have gone by now, with the move to One World Government, which were started in earnest a century ago, reaching the advanced stage, the confusion from hereon can only get much much worse.  The best thing the One World Government, which does already exist, could do, is start telling the world who they are, how they got to where they are, and what they intend to do.  Only then will the growing chaos of secretive groups running the world out of sight start to unravel.  There are of course, many ugly secrets to be told, and some of those secrets might well be to do with this man.  Why doesn’t Prince Charles tell us more of what he knows?

And what is his brother Andrew up to in Khazakstan?
WASP writes –

The book I referred you to THE WORLD ORDER by Eustace Mullins, is very informative, but many of your viewers might prefer to look at a video.

I found this You Tube Interview regarding this same book.

This will round off the subject, as the words come from ‘THE HORSES MOUTH’ so to speak.

Consider this w/r/t paying off debt

If $1/sec paid back taking a year as 365.25 days it would take to pay back $100,000 …… 31.5576 years

or $100,000,000 …31,557.6 years

& so on, but this is a better way of looking at it as per video.

I believe the USA Deficit is c.a.

$14.7 Trillion

YOUR NAME IS ON AN I.O.U FOR MORE THAN

14.7 TRILLION DOLLARS

A million seconds have elapsed in less than 12 days

A billion seconds took more than 35 years to tick away

A trillion seconds ago was bacck in the Stone Age,

in the year 29,607B.C.

Cameron’s Leveson deal is ‘threat to press freedom’, says human rights watchdog. And news blogs as well!

So the globalist soap opera rolls on. It appears that the whole Leveson phone hacking scandal was a means to an end.

What happens when you corner a rat? The rat attacks, and that is exactly what these rats are doing. They know that they’ve been rumbled. They are fully aware that people are waking up and exposing them for what they really are, political actors playing out a script written for them by the globalist masters, under the illusion of democracy.

People are starting to realise that all, and by that I mean all political parties are controlled by the elite. They play out the roles of government and opposition to reinforce the illusion of freedom, only to do as they are told when in power. Blair, a JPMorgan Chase man through and through, and still paid millions by them, plus earnings from Goldman Sachs, laid the foundations of the UK collapse under the guise of “New Labour”.

They are aware that some good journalists, yes there are still some, want to expose the truth. The rise of Alternative media sites, telling it how it really is, is a real threat to them, so they create a reason, planned over many years, to install controls on the media.

The hope that newspapers will refuse to sign up to this new charter is a false hope, as the newspapers are broadly owned by the same people who control the rest of the media.

This is a real threat and attack on freedom of speech on blogs like this. Here is a screen grab of the

interpretation

interpretations of the charter. Section 1,b(ii) clearly states news related websites!!

So the heat is being turned up. What’s that expression about “can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”; well, I love cooking, sorry.

Here’s the article from the Telegraph.

David Cameron has been accused of creating a “threat to press freedom” by an international body which polices human rights in some of the most autocratic countries.

By Christopher Hope, and Rowena Mason7:20PM GMT 18 Mar 2013

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which usually polices elections to ensure against human rights abuses, said that the phone hacking scandal should not be used as an “excuse” to restrict free speech.
The intervention was made after the Prime Minister was accused of putting together a “grubby deal” after he dropped his opposition to use legislation to underpin a new system of press regulation.
The Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders met with a Conservative minister in secret talks which lasted until early Monday morning to hammer out a deal which could see the press regulated by a new Royal Charter.
Those who refuse to sign up, including websites, now face “exemplary damages” if they are taken to court.
Several of the country’s biggest newspaper groups, including Telegraph Media Group, issued a statement expressing their initial concerns over the proposals.

There is growing speculation that some newspapers and magazines may boycott the new system amid claims it violates fundamental human rights. Mr Cameron unveiled the plans in Parliament as several MPs – exposed for their own failings in the media – welcomed the crackdown. In a statement, a spokesman for the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe said: “A government-established regulatory body, regardless of how independent it is intended to be, could pose a threat to media freedom. “I still believe that self-regulation is the best way to deal with ethical lapses and failures to comply with professional standards. “The phone-hacking scandal was a criminal issue and the people involved are being prosecuted. This should not be used as an excuse to rein in all print media.” The Index on Censorship, a campaign group chaired by veteran BBC broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, said creation of Britain’s first official newspaper regulator for 300 years marks a “sad day for press freedom”. Mr Dimbleby said he is “dismayed” that politicians will now get power over the regulation of newspapers. The board has the gravest anxiety at the residual political powers the now expected outcome and system will give to politicians,” Mr Dimbleby said. “The two thirds block on any changes to the royal charter could be abused in the future – not least when today’s emerging consensus shows that the parties can come together in both houses to agree on press regulation.” In the Commons, Mr Cameron sought to draw a line under the phone hacking scandal which started with the claim that the mobile phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler was hacked by reporters and led to scores of journalists being arrested and a full blown judicial inquiry by Lord Justice Leveson. Insisting that the cross-party deal on press regulation would defend the principle of a free press, Mr Cameron told MPs: “My message to the press is clear. We’ve had the debate. Now it is time to get on and make this system work.” He defended the need to enshrine the royal charter in law, which could be amended by peers and MPs at a later date, insisting: “It is legislation to protect the royal charter, it is not legislation to recognise the royal charter. Setting out his reasons for opposing more fundamental legislation, he said it would be “wrong to run even the slightest risk of infringing free speech or a free press”. He added: “As Winston Churchill said, ‘a free press is the unsleeping guardian of every other right that free men prize, it is the most dangerous foe of tyranny’. By rejecting statutory regulation but being in favour of a royal charter this House has defended that principle.” The royal charter will be submitted to the Queen for approval in May, once the necessary legislation has been approved by MPs and peers. Read the draft royal charter in full:

 

//
Read More

Was Pope John Paul, Albino Luciani Murdered?

I first posted this about two years ago, but it got lost in various revamps of the site, so here it is again

Albino Luciani was just 66 years old when he became Pope following the death of Pope Paul VI in 1978.

It is on record that he suffered from low blood pressure, and poor circulation, so it could be that he simply died from a pulmonary embolism as suggested by John Cornwell in his book A Thief in The Night , or did something more sinister happen?

This is an edited version of a piece appearing in Apokalypso

To understand the forces at work in the sudden death of Pope John Paul I in 1978, we should first back up a bit in time to the 19th Century, when the Church was stripped of its sovereign power in the Papal States by the Italian national revolution. As a result, after 1870 the Pope became the pathetic “Prisoner of the Vatican.” Perhaps to compensate for the loss of his earthly kingdom, Pope Pius IX (1846-1878) convoked Vatican Council I with the purpose of promulgating the doctrine of papal infallibility.

For his role in delivering the Italian nation into the bloody hands of Mussolini, Pope Pius XI (1922-1939) received the equivalent of $80 million ($500 million in today’s dollars) and restoration of the papacy’s temporal sovereignty in Vatican City under the terms of the Lateran Treaty of 1929. Pius and his successors would exploit this treaty to create a Vatican Bank, effectively beyond the reach of any regulation by secular authorities, thus uniquely suited to the work of tax evasion and money laundering.

Under the totalitarian doctrine laid down by Vatican Council I, any deviation from the Pope’s moral teaching was by definition “error.” Sacrificing his own health in the process, John XXIII struggled to pull together the reformist Vatican Council II in the face of fierce opposition by conservatives, who feared that any relaxation of Papal absolutism would undermine the entire Vatican edifice. To some degree, the conservatives proved right, for the free thought which Vatican Council II had encouraged did not stop with the Council’s largely symbolic reforms of the Catholic liturgy, but proceeded on to challenge the worldly power and wealth which the modern Church had erected.

After the death of John XXIII in 1963, the deadlock between conservatives and reformers in the College of Cardinals resulted in the election of a vacillating Pope Paul VI, who would agonize over the question of the morality of artificial birth control. During this time, Paul would be subjected to immense pressure from the old guard in the Curia, who were already battling to turn back the liberalizing tide of Vatican Council II.

When the conclave assembled in the wake of Paul’s death, it was deeply divided between those who sought to move forward with the democratic agenda of Vatican Council II and those who yearned for a reversion to the rigid dogma before Pope John XXIII. Cardinal Albino Luciani’s simple, self-effacing demeanor, gave him appeal to the conservative Curia as a perfect compromise candidate, whom they could effectively control.

Once elected, however, the new Pope began to display the brilliant mind and charisma that had been concealed behind his former reticent reserve. Not awed in the least by his exalted station, John Paul I immediately threw himself into an all-out effort to revolutionize the Papacy, to return it to its spiritual origins. At his coronation, he refused to be carried on the papal sedan and to wear the jewel-encrusted tiara. He refused to follow the scripts prepared for him by the Curia at his audiences and press conferences. Totally exasperated by the new Pontiff’s unexpected independence, the Curia actually began to censor the Pope’s remarks from the Vatican’s daily newspaper, particularly when he began to express his positive views on contraception.

While Albino Luciani proved to be an irritant to the Curia in many ways, he made himself its absolute nemesis when he delved into the Vatican Bank’s dealings, which dated back to the reign of his predecessor. In 1968, Pope Paul VI had taken into his confidence a Sicilian financier named Michele Sindona.

Sindona’s spectacular rise from veritable rags to control of a vast international banking empire was partially due to the support of his patrons in the Mafia and in P2, a secret Masonic society controlled by Lucio Gelli. Gelli had assembled a network of right-wing military and political figures. Relying on bribery, extortion, and, when necessary, assassination and terrorism to expand his web of power, Gelli financed his empire through the systematic plunder of a growing string of banks acquired by his associate Roberto Calvi. With the help of Gelli and Calvi, Sindona gained control of a group of some of the oldest and most prestigious financial institutions in Italy and Switzerland, including several in which the Vatican held an interest.

Paul VI had turned to Sindona for financial advice in 1968 when the government abolished the Vatican’s tax exemption for income from Italian investments. Fearing embarrassment at the public disclosure of the enormity of its financial portfolio, the Vatican opted to divest most of its domestic assets. Sindona offered an attractive price; his patrons in the Gambino family would exchange the “dirty” proceeds of their heroin trade for “clean” assets. Of course, the Holy See was not expected to deal directly with the Mafia, whose blood money they would receive; instead, a shell corporation was set up for the single task of acting as the conduit for the Gambino money.

With his bright intelligence and naive fearlessness, John Paul I penetrated to the heart of this maze of corruption within weeks of his coronation. On the evening of September 28, 1978, he called Cardinal Villot, the leader of the powerful Curia, to his private study to discuss certain changes that the Pope proposed to make public the next day. [It has been reported that John Paul was also considering the release of the famous “Third Secret of Fatima,” which was supposed to have been given to the public in 1960.] Among those whose “resignations” would be accepted by the Pontiff the following day were the head of the Vatican Bank, and several members of the Curia who were implicated in the activities of Sindona and P2, and Villot himself. Moreover, Villot was told that John Paul I would also announce plans for a meeting on October 24 with an American delegation to discuss a reconsideration of the Church’s position on birth control.

When Pope John Paul I retired to his bedroom on the evening of September 28, clutching the paperwork that would expose the Vatican’s financial dealings with the Mafia and purge the Curia of those responsible, a number of very ruthless individuals had a great interest in seeing to it that he would never awaken to issue these directives.

When the Pope’s housekeeper knocked at his door at 4:30 a.m., she heard no response. Leaving a cup of coffee, she returned fifteen minutes later to find the Pope still not stirring. She entered the bed chamber and gasped when she saw the Pope propped up in bed, still holding papers from the night before, his face contorted in a grimace. On the night table beside him lay an opened bottle of Effortil, a medication for his low blood pressure. The housekeeper immediately notified Cardinal Villot, whose first response to the news was to summon the papal morticians even before verifying the death himself or calling the Vatican physician to examine the body. Villot arrived in the Pope’s room at 5:00 a.m. and gathered the crucial papers, the Effortil bottle, and several personal items which were soiled with vomit. None of these articles were ever seen again.

Although the Vatican claimed that its house physician had determined myocardial infarction as the cause of death, to this day no death certificate for Pope John Paul I has been made public. Although Italian law requires a waiting period of at least 24 hours before a body may be embalmed, Cardinal Villot had the body of Albino Luciani prepared for within 12 hours of his death. Although the Vatican refused to allow an autopsy on the basis of an alleged prohibition against it in canon law, the Italian press verified that an autopsy had in fact been performed on one of the Pope’s predecessors, Pius VIII. Although the conventional procedure for embalming a body requires that the blood first be drained and certain internal organs removed, neither blood nor tissue was removed from the corpse; hence, none was available to assay for the presence of poison.

The following is taken from. www.tldm.org

After almost three years of research, David Yallop wrote, in his book In God’s Name (1984), that the precise circumstances attending the discovery of the body of John Paul I “eloquently demonstrate that the Vatican practiced a disinformation campaign.” The Vatican told one lie after another: “Lies about little things, lies about big things. All these lies had but one purpose: to disguise the fact that Albino Luciani, Pope John Paul I, had been assassinated.” Pope Luciani “received the palm of martyrdom because of his convictions.”

Sister Vicenza
Sister Vicenza found the Holy Father dead at approximately 4:45 a.m. on September 29, 1978 and was forced to keep silent by the Secretariat of State, Cardinal Villot, who imposed a vow of silence upon her to cover-up the whole affair. The secretaries were likewise forbidden to advise anyone of the events without Cardinal Villot’s authorization. A trustworthy person conveyed to Fr. Saez personally that Sister Vicenza had said, “But the world must know the truth.”
Sister Vicenza gave two conflicting reports concerning the state that she first found Pope John Paul I. According to her breathless words to a group of French priests that same morning, it was “in his bathroom” that she had “found him dead.” Yet another report (no doubt arranged by Cardinal Villot), says that Sister Vicenza entered the room and found the Pope sitting up in bed, “with an expression of agony” before he died. This discrepancy is very important: if it was determined that Sister Vicenza found the Holy Father dead in the bathroom, still in his papal robes, this would indicate that Pope John Paul I died shortly after his “toast” with Cardinal Villot the night of September 28, 1978.

Cardinal Villot in the hours following
Pope John Paul I’s murder

David Yallop reconstructs the actions of Cardinal Villot and paints a very suspicious portrait. It is reported that at 5:00 a.m. Cardinal Villot confirmed the Holy Father’s death. The Pope’s glasses, slippers, and will disappeared, “none of these items has ever been seen again.” Speculation is that there may have been vomit on the slippers, which if examined would identify poison as the cause of death.
Cardinal Villot (or an aide) telephoned the embalmers and a Vatican car was sent to fetch them. Incredibly, the car was at their door at 5:00 a.m.! What ensued in the following hour is still a mystery.
It was not until 6:00 a.m. that Dr. Buzzonati (not Professor Fontana, the head of the Vatican medical service), arrived and confirmed the death, without drawing up a death certificate. Dr. Buzzonati attributed the death to acute myocardial infarction (heart attack).
At about 6:30 a.m. Villot began to inform the cardinals, an hour and a half after the embalmers had arrived! Yallop notes that, for Cardinal Villot, the embalmers took precedence over the cardinals and the head of the Vatican medical service.
By 6 p.m. that evening, the Papal Apartments had been entirely polished and washed. Yallop writes that the secretaries packed up and carried away the Pope’s clothes, “including his letters, notes, books and a small handful of personal mementos…. By 6:00 p.m., the entire 19 rooms of the Papal Apartments were totally bereft of anything remotely associated with the Papacy of Luciani.”
Villot arranged for the embalming to be performed that evening, a procedure as unusual as it was illegal. Why the rush? It is also reported that during the embalming it was insisted that no blood was to be drained from the body, and neither were any of the organs to be removed. Yallop notes that “a small quantity of blood would of course have been more than sufficient for a forensic scientist to establish the presence of any poisonous substances.”

An alibi for Cardinal Villot:
As the book In God’s Name (more than 5 million copies sold) attracted worldwide attention, a disinformation campaign arose in 1984 to discredit David Yallop’s conclusions. In a news article quoting Fr. Giovanni Gennari (attempting to defend the Curia against the accusations of investigative journalist David Yallop), Fr. Gennari stated: “John Paul II’s predecessor mistakenly took an overdose of tranquillisers… After his conversation with Cardinal Villot, the Pope [John Paul I] mistook the dose he should have taken.” (Ouest-France, undated press clipping, July 1984) The same article repeats a statement made by Cardinal Villot in 1978, his alibi

Villot: “What occurred was a tragic accident. The Pope had unwittingly taken an overdose of his medicine. If an autopsy was performed it would obviously show this fatal overdose. No one would believe that His Holiness had taken it accidentally. Some would allege suicide, others murder. It was agreed that there would be no autopsy.”

So Cardinal Villot’s alibi was that Pope John Paul I overdosed on his own medication for low blood pressure (Effortil). This alibi intentionally left room for speculation of suicide, to deflect attention away from the real cause of John Paul I’s death: poisoning by Cardinal Villot himself.

Pope John Paul I was in good health
According to Dr. Buzzonati, Pope John Paul I’s cause of death was a heart attack. Regarding this alleged “heart attack,” John Paul I’s niece affirmed:

“In my family almost no one believes it was a heart attack that killed my uncle. He never had heart trouble or any illness of that kind.” (San Juan Star, October 3, 1978) http://www.thesanjuanstar.com/

And Pope John Paul I’s brother:

“John Paul’s brother Edoardo, in Australia on a trade mission, reported that the Pope had been given a clean bill of health after a medical examination three weeks ago. He was frail in health as an infant and as a young priest, but there were no reports of heart trouble.” (San Juan Star, October 9, 1978)

From Time magazine (October 9, 1978):

In an earlier age so untimely a death might have stirred deep suspicions: “If this were the time of the Borgias,” said a young teacher in Rome, “there’d be talk that John Paul was poisoned.”

But the Vatican replied that such allegations were “irresponsible.” (San Juan Star, October 18, 1978)

Enough evidence for any law-respecting state
Fr. Saez notes in his book that the amount of evidence is such that “no judge on earth could disregard it.” He also notes that

“the data and the evidence that we already possess would justify a serious judicial enquiry in any law-respecting state. Now, not only does the Vatican refuse to conduct such an enquiry, but it does exactly the opposite: it thwarts and suppresses any research that tries to get to the bottom of this enigma surrounding John Paul I’s death. This state of affairs is manifest in the Vatican’s refusal to carry out an autopsy (if in fact one was not carried out) or in the clandestine nature of this operation (if it did actually take place). It also reveals itself in the obscurity surrounding the embalming, in the way that information regarding the circumstances of the death and the discovery of the body was manipulated, in the silence imposed on Sister Vicenza, in the pressure brought to bear on individuals and institutions, and in the widespread fear of speaking about this whole affair. This fear, whether conscious or not, runs particularly deep in ecclesiastical circles.”

International Arrest Warrant Issued Against Pope Francis I for Crimes Against Humanity and Child Trafficking

Pope Francis. Titter Ye Not

Pope Francis. Titter Ye Not

Yes I’m lazy and got it very wrong. I do work full time and therefore have to use early mornings, and late evenings to create this site, but that’s no excuse for getting this one so wrong.

When the new Pope Frankie the first was announced I trusted Google to give me some background, didn’t find anything, so posted a light hearted headline. It appears Frankie the first has a darker background than I first thought, “titter ye not ”

Our friends at This Incredible World have written a great piece:

International Arrest Warrant issued against Pope Francis I, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, for Crimes against Humanity and Child Trafficking

Italians and others are empowered to apprehend the new Pontiff

ITCCS ~ March 15, 2013

 

Brussels:

The same Common Law Court that tried and sentenced his predecessor and other church and state officials has today issued an Arrest Warrant against the first Jesuit Pope in history, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

A signed and sealed copy of the Warrant is attached, and the text follows.

The Argentinian prelate assumed criminal liability and became subject to immediate arrest by occupying the Papal seat in the wake of the conviction of the Vatican as a criminal organization on February 25, 2013.

Bergoglio’s role in the death of Argentinian citizens during that country’s “Dirty War” and in the trafficking of the children of political prisoners also compelled the International Common Law Court of Justice to issue the Warrant today, which is one year in duration.

Italian and Argentinian citizens, and any man or woman, are authorized by the Warrant to be involved in Bergoglio’s public detaining. ~

“The Pope is the head of a predatory power that is waging an undeclared, centuries-old war against the entire non-Catholic world” commented ITCCS Field Secretary Kevin Annett today in Vancouver, where he delivered a copy of the Arrest Warrant to the Catholic Archdiocese office.

“Since we and our children are being assaulted by a corporation that is a law unto itself, we have the right to defend ourselves and detain or stop altogether those responsible, as in any war”.

A Public Proclamation is being read out in twenty eight countries this week by ITCCS members, publicly banning those church and state officials who cannot be immediately arrested under these Warrants.

Citizens are encouraged to download and use the attached Warrant.

Issued by ITCCS Central Office
15 March, 2013
Brussels

warrant5

warrant6

Read more: