Bum Gate. Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton’s Exposed Bottom Shunned By UK Tabloids.

Kate BumWhat a load of old fanny, well, not exactly true, as it was her back bottom exposed in the German press today, not her front, but you get the point. Although the self-righteous British media refused to print the sneaky peaky shot of Goldilocks Middleton’s derrière,  they still filled a lot of column inches talking about it. Whether it is the fall out after Leverson, or that they smelt a big fat rat, who knows. Even LBC, London Broadcasting Corporation,  London’s Biggest Conversation, Leading Britain’s Conversation,  “Loada” Biased Codswallop, got in on the act today, with old Fleet Street hack, the Murdoch loving Nick Ferrari conducting an on air poll to see if they should publish the image or not. with the result unsurprisingly being not to publish. If you really want to see the image, go to Bild here. We have covered up the cheeky bits, not because we are frightened of publishing the Royal keister, after all it’s not the first “up skirt” shot of Kate, but Bild paid good Euro’s to secure the rights to her tuchas photo (I’m running out of bottom words, although that last one is quite apt, very Jewish), so there must be copyright issues here.

My real feeling is that she, and Prince Willy, were well aware of the chances of a good bum shot happening. After all, Willy is a helicopter pilot, so he must have at least a basic understanding of up draft, or whatever it’s called. It happened before in Canada, when again her posterior was exposed to the public. As my old mum would have said, “at least wear a slip dear, or some sensible knickers”

dianaWilly’s mum, St Diana of Goldsmith (allegedly) fell foul to the skirt gaff very early in her media manipulating career, so you would have thought they would learn by their mistakes. Hang on, that shot got huge media coverage all over the world!

Or were they hoping to get the cheeky shot covered by the UK media to force more control on them, you know, the invasion of privacy stuff, and the UK media decided on mass not to bite? Nah, I don’t buy that one, seeing as how the media is controlled by the Global Elite.

Or were they hoping that the alternative media would jump on the publish and be damned bandwagon. Can’t see that either, because this happened in public, so there can’t be a privacy issue, and as for bad taste and offensive, not a chance. £2 million to refurbish Kensington Palace for this pair, now that’s offensive.

There is however quite a history of naughty Royal snaps. It is said that Princess Maggie had a bit of bother with some porno quality photos of her and a close friend who didn’t exactly fit the normal Royal boy friend demographics. Up kilt shots of both Prince Philip Battenberg and Prince Charles Saxe-Coburg and Gotha aka Charles Windsor. Shots thought to be of Prince Andrew full frontal naked jumping into a lake, the famous Sarah “Massey” Ferguson  topless toe sucking. Shots reportedly showing Willy’s willy, and of course the holiday snaps of Kate topless, so by these standards, a pair of bum cheeks is quite tame.

No, which ever way I look at it, my conclusion, they knew full well there was a good chance of the “botty shotty”. Why else would she wear a flimsy dress and thong (if indeed she is wearing any underwear at all). Or they are just simply incredibly naive and stupid.

Advertisements

Spa launches fat-busting laser that claims to give you a trim tum like the Duchess of Cambridge in just FOUR weeks

Before and afterAnyone know where I can buy some incontinence pants, because I’ve just pmsl. Another classic load of old rubbish from the Mail today read here.

If you want to read the article, feel free, what a load of old nonsense. I’m not knocking Harvey Nichols’ Beyond MediSpa, I’m sure they are very genuine, although the image included in the article is so obviously “Photoshopped” it’s a joke. The images are supposed to have been taken 4 weeks apart.  It’s the same image, same shadows, same clothing, same colour tone, same moles. Bra line identical, thong line identical, 1st image soft focus, 2nd image, bit of work around the front bottom area, slight difference where the front bottom thong has been altered, tummy moved in a bit, oh and image 1 is slightly magnified, but it’s still the same shot.

goldilocksHowever, that’s not what made me laugh, it was the shot of Goldilocks Middleton and the volley tummy. Ha Ha, is it April 1st, nope just checked it’s November 24. That image was taken sometime in October.

I don’t want to labour the point here, not that Kate would understand what that means, but we did cover this a few weeks ago see here.

If that is the tummy of a woman who a couple of months ago really gave birth to 8lb 6oz Prince George, then there is no hope for any of us.

What has  happened here is damage limitation.  What are the chances of getting a shot of the royal flesh when she’s not on holiday? The volley tummy shot was never meant to have happened. It did, questions were asked, this article comes out a few weeks later to sort of make it plausible. Nice try, but I don’t buy it.

goldilocks lge

Kate Middleton. Is This The Stomach Of A New Mother?

Kate 1These people are so arrogant, they don’t even try these days. They think the public is so blind, we can’t see the obvious, even when it is there in full view.

Fresh on the heels of Prince Harry giving the old Masonic hand shake, we have alleged new mother Kate playing volley ball. How lovely. these super fit Royals are wonderful aren’t they.

Now call be an old skeptic, but is this really the stomach of a woman who was hospitalised with severe morning sickness, went full term and gave birth to an 8lb 6oz baby boy on July 22 2013, less than 3 months ago, I don’t think so.

Let’s have a quick recap, here is a snap of Kate, pre-birth.

kate 5

Kate pregnant, or is it a body suit? who knows, nice thin fingers, no sign of puffiness.

Kate 4

Kate leaves hospital, nice thin fingers, still wearing the body suit, who’s baby is it?

Kate 1

Less than three months later? Dear oh dear, there is something wrong here!

Kate 1a

I must rush out and get a commemorative mug.

Prince Harry Gives Away Masonic Connection

Harry 2a

I was just thinking while I was writing this, do you remember Harry Hewitt, “ee, by eck chuck” we do, he were wedded to Concepta, and a bezzie mucker of Len Fairclough. (sorry for the deliberate mix of Mancunian, Yorkshire and Scouse, but I live sarff of Watford). I’ve no idea why that popped into my head, so sorry.

Prince Harry, was photographed today shaking hands with football legend Sir Bobby Charlton, well cop a gander at the old hand shake. I thought to myself, funny, I wonder if he hurt his thumb playing rugby earlier? What do you think?

Grip of an Entered Apprentice It says in my book of funny hand shakes that it is the “Grip of an Entered Apprentice”, but what do I know?

The other photos are fun though.

harry 4

Who does that girl remind  me of?

Who does that girl remind me of?

Prince Philip, Back To His Normal Insulting Self.

PhilWell, Philip Battenberg / Mountbatten / Windsor, is back, hoorah. Yes the 92 year old Duke was out and about today taking the micky out of less fortunate, mainly younger pensioners who have to use zimmer frames. Well they don’t have access to the same elixir of life he does do they. Phil2

You have to admire the old Duke, he has a great sense of humour, here’s one he told today. There was this little girl in a football like game and the Duke asked if they get bonus points for knocking her off of the ball. LOLHRH. Not as many bonus points as you get for taking out a Mercedes in a Tunnel, that’s for sure. (allegedly)

Royal Propaganda Machine Working Overtime.

queen (1)These are very odd times. The country is bankrupt, both physically and morally with the globalist master plan unfolding in plain view before our very eyes. 90% of the population (conservative estimate) so dumbed down and and hypnotised by the deliberate mind control system, that it doesn’t even have to be done covertly any more.

I switched on the news this morning,  to be force fed images of the lovely new Royal parents cooing over Prince George. Yesterday we had Diana’s eldest son giving what appeared to be a well rehearsed “off the cuff” interview about the problems of being a new parent, lack of sleep blah blah, and how it’s much worse for Catherine, yeah, right Wills, we all really buy into that one.

Well, to be fair, most people actually do buy into it. I wonder how long it will be before we see the articles about how quickly Goldilocks Middleton has regained her amazing pre-pregnancy figure?  Anyway, getting back to the subject, while the country is being crushed and destroyed, we are all being force fed this drivel  about another royal baby. If you really think all of this new parent junk is true, I suggest you go back to watching Jeremy Kyle.

I was actually thinking about “Queen of Hearts” Diana Sunday night while lying in the bath. Not an image that you really needed, just painting a picture of where I do my thinking, but I had just watched for the second time  Helen Mirrens film “The Queen”. I was never a Diana fan, sorry if that upsets people, but in my opinion, she was as fake as the rest of them.  Well, she was of course very much one of them, poor little Jewish girl who started to believe her own press. The whole idea that she went into the marriage with the heir to the throne expecting him to be faithful only to her is laughable. She was a Spencer, or maybe a Goldsmith, depending on who Daddy really was. Her mother, the Shand-Kiss woman was a Rothschild.  Just to clarify the Daddy bit, in case you didn’t know, the word on the street is that Diana was Jimmy Goldsmiths daughter, and when you see photo’s of Jemima and Zac it fits nicely, and of course Fanny and Jimmy were said to be lovers. The point is, that this bed hopping was nothing new to her, it was in her DNA. It becomes even more complex when you consider Queen Victoria’s real father was said to be a Rothschild, but I digress.

The Queen of Hearts was really the “Queen of Spin”. When I hear all the tosh about the press hounding her, it makes my stomach churn. She was a master of manipulating them for her own ends, they knew it, and loved it. As Nick Ferrari said the other morning, any story about Diana on the front page, added thousands to the circulation.

Diana became a loose cannon. She was privy to insider information that could have finished the bunch of inbred’s off for once and for all. So although she was always one of them, they are not adverse to culling out the trouble makers for the greater good of the firm. Did she deserve to die in that tunnel in France, of course not, any more than hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children being slaughtered in the globalist funded wars being played out across the globe.

aroAnyway back to the film “The Queen”. It was good to see Michael Sheen playing Tony Blair, a role he reprieved in the Twilight Saga, along side Helen McCrory playing Cherie Booth, a role she reprieved in Harry Potter. Talk about the propaganda machine working overtime. My problem with films like that, The Kings Speech, or even Shakespeare’s Richard The Third, is that people actually believe that they are real, and history becomes re-programmed. Helen McCory

Nothing we think we know about these people is real, and to coin that well used praise from a “Few Good Men”, “You Can’t Handle The Truth”, because the truth is way beyond the comprehension of most people. These people are void of any form of compassion and empathy. We are their cattle, servicing their greed and need for power, and as long as the sheep (deliberate use of mixed metaphors there) choose to remain blind to the truth, they will continue to farm us for their own ends.

The good news is that a growing number of us are seeing them for what they really are, and as soon as we choose to step outside of their control system, we are no longer the cattle.

 

Princess Diana’s Death, New Evidence or Something Darker?

carWhow, it’s all over the MSM today, the SAS was responsible to the murder of Diana and Dodi. Here’s a little snippet from the Mirror.

“Police are investigating a sensational claim that the SAS was involved in the death of Princess Diana, reports Sean Rayment.

The allegation emerged at the second court martial of Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegally possessing a gun and ammunition.

It came in a letter to the elite unit’s commanding officer by the parents-in-law of a special forces sniper, known only as Soldier N, who was Sgt Nightingale’s former house mate and a key witness for the prosecution.

The letter said Solider N boasted the SAS “was behind Princess Diana’s death”.

The Ministry of Defence, the Royal Military Police and the Service Prosecuting Authority have known of its existence and the claim since it was sent in September 2011. Full article here

My question is, what is the agenda here? Why would the MSM suddenly start running stories in the week of the anniversary of her death. And again, why are they still using the image of the car after the roof had been removed by the rescue services?

As damaged as the Mercedes was, it looks very different before they started to started working on it.

Princess_Diana_inquest_photos_6

Obviously that image is as misleading as the rest, because the impact zone is not visible, bit the point is, the MSM have been sitting on this for 16 years, anyone who truly believes Henri Paul was responsible should go back to watching Eastenders, so what’s going down, why suddenly bring up the SAS story?

Could it be that the weight of the Alternative Media is now getting so strong that the MSM are going to start doing what they have always had a duty to do, investigate to get to the truth?

Don’t hold your breath.

Interesting piece here:

The Mysterious Deaths of Princess Diana, Jill Dando, British Intelligence, CIA Snoopers, SAS, William Hague and the VIP child-abuse connection