Bum Gate. Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton’s Exposed Bottom Shunned By UK Tabloids.

Kate BumWhat a load of old fanny, well, not exactly true, as it was her back bottom exposed in the German press today, not her front, but you get the point. Although the self-righteous British media refused to print the sneaky peaky shot of Goldilocks Middleton’s derrière,  they still filled a lot of column inches talking about it. Whether it is the fall out after Leverson, or that they smelt a big fat rat, who knows. Even LBC, London Broadcasting Corporation,  London’s Biggest Conversation, Leading Britain’s Conversation,  “Loada” Biased Codswallop, got in on the act today, with old Fleet Street hack, the Murdoch loving Nick Ferrari conducting an on air poll to see if they should publish the image or not. with the result unsurprisingly being not to publish. If you really want to see the image, go to Bild here. We have covered up the cheeky bits, not because we are frightened of publishing the Royal keister, after all it’s not the first “up skirt” shot of Kate, but Bild paid good Euro’s to secure the rights to her tuchas photo (I’m running out of bottom words, although that last one is quite apt, very Jewish), so there must be copyright issues here.

My real feeling is that she, and Prince Willy, were well aware of the chances of a good bum shot happening. After all, Willy is a helicopter pilot, so he must have at least a basic understanding of up draft, or whatever it’s called. It happened before in Canada, when again her posterior was exposed to the public. As my old mum would have said, “at least wear a slip dear, or some sensible knickers”

dianaWilly’s mum, St Diana of Goldsmith (allegedly) fell foul to the skirt gaff very early in her media manipulating career, so you would have thought they would learn by their mistakes. Hang on, that shot got huge media coverage all over the world!

Or were they hoping to get the cheeky shot covered by the UK media to force more control on them, you know, the invasion of privacy stuff, and the UK media decided on mass not to bite? Nah, I don’t buy that one, seeing as how the media is controlled by the Global Elite.

Or were they hoping that the alternative media would jump on the publish and be damned bandwagon. Can’t see that either, because this happened in public, so there can’t be a privacy issue, and as for bad taste and offensive, not a chance. £2 million to refurbish Kensington Palace for this pair, now that’s offensive.

There is however quite a history of naughty Royal snaps. It is said that Princess Maggie had a bit of bother with some porno quality photos of her and a close friend who didn’t exactly fit the normal Royal boy friend demographics. Up kilt shots of both Prince Philip Battenberg and Prince Charles Saxe-Coburg and Gotha aka Charles Windsor. Shots thought to be of Prince Andrew full frontal naked jumping into a lake, the famous Sarah “Massey” Ferguson  topless toe sucking. Shots reportedly showing Willy’s willy, and of course the holiday snaps of Kate topless, so by these standards, a pair of bum cheeks is quite tame.

No, which ever way I look at it, my conclusion, they knew full well there was a good chance of the “botty shotty”. Why else would she wear a flimsy dress and thong (if indeed she is wearing any underwear at all). Or they are just simply incredibly naive and stupid.

Spa launches fat-busting laser that claims to give you a trim tum like the Duchess of Cambridge in just FOUR weeks

Before and afterAnyone know where I can buy some incontinence pants, because I’ve just pmsl. Another classic load of old rubbish from the Mail today read here.

If you want to read the article, feel free, what a load of old nonsense. I’m not knocking Harvey Nichols’ Beyond MediSpa, I’m sure they are very genuine, although the image included in the article is so obviously “Photoshopped” it’s a joke. The images are supposed to have been taken 4 weeks apart.  It’s the same image, same shadows, same clothing, same colour tone, same moles. Bra line identical, thong line identical, 1st image soft focus, 2nd image, bit of work around the front bottom area, slight difference where the front bottom thong has been altered, tummy moved in a bit, oh and image 1 is slightly magnified, but it’s still the same shot.

goldilocksHowever, that’s not what made me laugh, it was the shot of Goldilocks Middleton and the volley tummy. Ha Ha, is it April 1st, nope just checked it’s November 24. That image was taken sometime in October.

I don’t want to labour the point here, not that Kate would understand what that means, but we did cover this a few weeks ago see here.

If that is the tummy of a woman who a couple of months ago really gave birth to 8lb 6oz Prince George, then there is no hope for any of us.

What has  happened here is damage limitation.  What are the chances of getting a shot of the royal flesh when she’s not on holiday? The volley tummy shot was never meant to have happened. It did, questions were asked, this article comes out a few weeks later to sort of make it plausible. Nice try, but I don’t buy it.

goldilocks lge

Kate Middleton. Is This The Stomach Of A New Mother?

Kate 1These people are so arrogant, they don’t even try these days. They think the public is so blind, we can’t see the obvious, even when it is there in full view.

Fresh on the heels of Prince Harry giving the old Masonic hand shake, we have alleged new mother Kate playing volley ball. How lovely. these super fit Royals are wonderful aren’t they.

Now call be an old skeptic, but is this really the stomach of a woman who was hospitalised with severe morning sickness, went full term and gave birth to an 8lb 6oz baby boy on July 22 2013, less than 3 months ago, I don’t think so.

Let’s have a quick recap, here is a snap of Kate, pre-birth.

kate 5

Kate pregnant, or is it a body suit? who knows, nice thin fingers, no sign of puffiness.

Kate 4

Kate leaves hospital, nice thin fingers, still wearing the body suit, who’s baby is it?

Kate 1

Less than three months later? Dear oh dear, there is something wrong here!

Kate 1a

I must rush out and get a commemorative mug.

Prince Harry Gives Away Masonic Connection

Harry 2a

I was just thinking while I was writing this, do you remember Harry Hewitt, “ee, by eck chuck” we do, he were wedded to Concepta, and a bezzie mucker of Len Fairclough. (sorry for the deliberate mix of Mancunian, Yorkshire and Scouse, but I live sarff of Watford). I’ve no idea why that popped into my head, so sorry.

Prince Harry, was photographed today shaking hands with football legend Sir Bobby Charlton, well cop a gander at the old hand shake. I thought to myself, funny, I wonder if he hurt his thumb playing rugby earlier? What do you think?

Grip of an Entered Apprentice It says in my book of funny hand shakes that it is the “Grip of an Entered Apprentice”, but what do I know?

The other photos are fun though.

harry 4

Who does that girl remind  me of?

Who does that girl remind me of?

Prince Philip, Back To His Normal Insulting Self.

PhilWell, Philip Battenberg / Mountbatten / Windsor, is back, hoorah. Yes the 92 year old Duke was out and about today taking the micky out of less fortunate, mainly younger pensioners who have to use zimmer frames. Well they don’t have access to the same elixir of life he does do they. Phil2

You have to admire the old Duke, he has a great sense of humour, here’s one he told today. There was this little girl in a football like game and the Duke asked if they get bonus points for knocking her off of the ball. LOLHRH. Not as many bonus points as you get for taking out a Mercedes in a Tunnel, that’s for sure. (allegedly)

Royal Propaganda Machine Working Overtime.

queen (1)These are very odd times. The country is bankrupt, both physically and morally with the globalist master plan unfolding in plain view before our very eyes. 90% of the population (conservative estimate) so dumbed down and and hypnotised by the deliberate mind control system, that it doesn’t even have to be done covertly any more.

I switched on the news this morning,  to be force fed images of the lovely new Royal parents cooing over Prince George. Yesterday we had Diana’s eldest son giving what appeared to be a well rehearsed “off the cuff” interview about the problems of being a new parent, lack of sleep blah blah, and how it’s much worse for Catherine, yeah, right Wills, we all really buy into that one.

Well, to be fair, most people actually do buy into it. I wonder how long it will be before we see the articles about how quickly Goldilocks Middleton has regained her amazing pre-pregnancy figure?  Anyway, getting back to the subject, while the country is being crushed and destroyed, we are all being force fed this drivel  about another royal baby. If you really think all of this new parent junk is true, I suggest you go back to watching Jeremy Kyle.

I was actually thinking about “Queen of Hearts” Diana Sunday night while lying in the bath. Not an image that you really needed, just painting a picture of where I do my thinking, but I had just watched for the second time  Helen Mirrens film “The Queen”. I was never a Diana fan, sorry if that upsets people, but in my opinion, she was as fake as the rest of them.  Well, she was of course very much one of them, poor little Jewish girl who started to believe her own press. The whole idea that she went into the marriage with the heir to the throne expecting him to be faithful only to her is laughable. She was a Spencer, or maybe a Goldsmith, depending on who Daddy really was. Her mother, the Shand-Kiss woman was a Rothschild.  Just to clarify the Daddy bit, in case you didn’t know, the word on the street is that Diana was Jimmy Goldsmiths daughter, and when you see photo’s of Jemima and Zac it fits nicely, and of course Fanny and Jimmy were said to be lovers. The point is, that this bed hopping was nothing new to her, it was in her DNA. It becomes even more complex when you consider Queen Victoria’s real father was said to be a Rothschild, but I digress.

The Queen of Hearts was really the “Queen of Spin”. When I hear all the tosh about the press hounding her, it makes my stomach churn. She was a master of manipulating them for her own ends, they knew it, and loved it. As Nick Ferrari said the other morning, any story about Diana on the front page, added thousands to the circulation.

Diana became a loose cannon. She was privy to insider information that could have finished the bunch of inbred’s off for once and for all. So although she was always one of them, they are not adverse to culling out the trouble makers for the greater good of the firm. Did she deserve to die in that tunnel in France, of course not, any more than hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children being slaughtered in the globalist funded wars being played out across the globe.

aroAnyway back to the film “The Queen”. It was good to see Michael Sheen playing Tony Blair, a role he reprieved in the Twilight Saga, along side Helen McCrory playing Cherie Booth, a role she reprieved in Harry Potter. Talk about the propaganda machine working overtime. My problem with films like that, The Kings Speech, or even Shakespeare’s Richard The Third, is that people actually believe that they are real, and history becomes re-programmed. Helen McCory

Nothing we think we know about these people is real, and to coin that well used praise from a “Few Good Men”, “You Can’t Handle The Truth”, because the truth is way beyond the comprehension of most people. These people are void of any form of compassion and empathy. We are their cattle, servicing their greed and need for power, and as long as the sheep (deliberate use of mixed metaphors there) choose to remain blind to the truth, they will continue to farm us for their own ends.

The good news is that a growing number of us are seeing them for what they really are, and as soon as we choose to step outside of their control system, we are no longer the cattle.

 

Princess Diana’s Death, New Evidence or Something Darker?

carWhow, it’s all over the MSM today, the SAS was responsible to the murder of Diana and Dodi. Here’s a little snippet from the Mirror.

“Police are investigating a sensational claim that the SAS was involved in the death of Princess Diana, reports Sean Rayment.

The allegation emerged at the second court martial of Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegally possessing a gun and ammunition.

It came in a letter to the elite unit’s commanding officer by the parents-in-law of a special forces sniper, known only as Soldier N, who was Sgt Nightingale’s former house mate and a key witness for the prosecution.

The letter said Solider N boasted the SAS “was behind Princess Diana’s death”.

The Ministry of Defence, the Royal Military Police and the Service Prosecuting Authority have known of its existence and the claim since it was sent in September 2011. Full article here

My question is, what is the agenda here? Why would the MSM suddenly start running stories in the week of the anniversary of her death. And again, why are they still using the image of the car after the roof had been removed by the rescue services?

As damaged as the Mercedes was, it looks very different before they started to started working on it.

Princess_Diana_inquest_photos_6

Obviously that image is as misleading as the rest, because the impact zone is not visible, bit the point is, the MSM have been sitting on this for 16 years, anyone who truly believes Henri Paul was responsible should go back to watching Eastenders, so what’s going down, why suddenly bring up the SAS story?

Could it be that the weight of the Alternative Media is now getting so strong that the MSM are going to start doing what they have always had a duty to do, investigate to get to the truth?

Don’t hold your breath.

Interesting piece here:

The Mysterious Deaths of Princess Diana, Jill Dando, British Intelligence, CIA Snoopers, SAS, William Hague and the VIP child-abuse connection

Painting Of The Queen. OMG

Not that I’m overly bothered about paintings of the Queen, or any member of that dysfunctional crowd to be honest, but this painting by Dan Llywelyn Hall is brilliant, in a perverse, sort of way.

Mrs Battenberg is shown with a very ample bosom, claw like hands, and a rather non human face. Maybe there is something in what old Icke says after all.

I still think Rolfs painting is better, but I suspect Rolf was a lot closer to her than Dan.

rolf and liz

 

 

 

 

But my all time favorite is Lucien Freud. He certainly knows how to slap the old oils about.

queen2

Globalist Funeral For Margaret Thatcher

It makes you proud to be British. Nobody can organise a send off like our globalist masters, and like everything they engineer, we foot the bill.

Today’s Funeral for Margaret Thatcher was a master piece of Pomp and Circumcision, (sorry Benjamin, that was a cheap dig) Pomp and Ceremony. Timed to the second, the worlds great and good turned up to pay their respects to the grocers daughter from Grantham. And in true Thatcher style, it was the plebs who weren’t allowed to attend who paid for it. Now I don’t mean to be nasty here, but if she was held in such high esteem by this lot, why didn’t they have a whip round and foot the bill between them?

That always makes me smile when I hear “the grocers daughter ” bit. The media usually forget to mention that Alf Roberts was alderman and Mayor of Grantham , obviously a local Councillor, and on all accounts a bit of a naughty boy when it comes to the ladies. (Source) He was also a part-time Justice of the Peace, president of the Chamber of Trade, President of Rotary, a director of the Grantham Building Society, a director of the Trustee Savings Bank, chairman of the local National Savings Movement, a governor of the local boys and girls grammar schools and chairman of the Workers’ Educational Association. With his fingers in many pies so to speak, old Alf wasn’t exactly just a grocer.

So, Thatcher, is gone. She played her role well, so I thought it would be nice to share some of the memorable images of the day.

Benjamin  Netanyahu and Henry Kissinger

Benjamin Netanyahu and Henry Kissinger

Nice to see Leon Brittan still out and about.

Nice to see Leon Brittan still out and about.

Bernard Ingham. Wow, what can I say about the eye brows.

Bernard Ingham. Wow, what can I say about the eye brows.

Thatcher-1837151

Spivey spots Lean Brittan in the crowd

Spivey spots Lean Brittan in the crowd.

The Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher Is Dead

Margaret Thatcher is Dead.

cnn thatcherSo, Margaret Thatcher is dead. This, perhaps not unexpected end to the once Iron Lady has seen an astonishing out pouring of grief and sycophantic drivel in the main stream media. Although I really had a chuckle to myself when CNN didn’t quite get it right and flashed up an image of her with best buddy and long time Christmas house guest, Sir Jimmy Savile. That was either an example of just how stupid they are, or perhaps how clever, who knows.

Although it is nice to see the shot of them supporting the NSPCC again, keep up the good work Chris, “don’t cha know”.

There is no doubt that Thatcher was a great politician, but that in no ways infers that she was a great person. Politicians are masters at manipulation and control, and Thatcher was one of the best.

She always said that one of her greatest successes was Tony Blair, and it is true that she and her Globalist led policies paved the way for the “New Labour” machine of Mandelson, Blair and Brown to destroy this great nation.
It would be wrong and hypocritical of me not to confess that I was once a supporter of Thatcher. She seemed to have a lot going for her. Having lived through the Heath “3 day week” era, another spell of Wilson, and then the disastrous Callaghan, Thatcher appeared to be the leader to pull the UK out of total devastation.

She openly despised Edward Heath, appeared to be more Euro Skeptic than pro Europe, remember the spats with Jacques Delors, and on the surface put the Grate back into Britain.

thatcherHowever, when you look at her more closely, you realise that she was no different to any of this type of controlled pseudo leader, serving her masters very effectively, until she out lived her usefulness.

She broke the unions power, for no other reason than they were the only opposition and stumbling block to the bankers plans for total takeover. Continuing with her Hayekian template, she embarked on a program of privatisation, sold to us as a way for the man in the street to own shares in the utility companies, but which was in truth nothing more than a way to hand over control of essential services like gas and electricity supply to the global control system.

At no time should any essential service be in the hands of profit seeking giant corporations.  How the hell did they get away with privatising water in this country? Will someone please tell me where the competition is?

British Steel, British Petroleum, Rolls Royce, British Airways where all sold off, just look at them now.

But, and even more worrying, behind the scenes there was a much darker side to her. When you consider that all of this was put in place by a government embroiled in paedophile cover ups, with some very dubious characters on the fringes, i.e. Jimmy Savile. Her cabinet was awash with some really perverted people. When you understand the truth that Icke has been saying for years, that Governments are controlled by blackmail, paedophilia being part the cement that holds it all together, you start to understand how it all works, and why so many perverted creatures have such high places in public office.

So, although Thatcher publicly despised known paedpohile Heath, and also appeared to reject his pro Europe approach, she played her own massive part in the long planned  destruction of UK plc. She famously rejected any talk of the UK taking part in the joint Euro currency nonsense, why? Again, she used the keep the British pound argument to her advantage, while all along, the UK was never going to be part of the Euro, with the City of London needing to be kept well away away from it.

Her successor, John Major-Ball, was a bit part player, just to keep things ticking over while the three horsemen of the Apocalypse, prepared for the end game of New Labour, once John Smith was out of the way.

The UK and of course most of the rest of the world is now totally under the control of the global banking families. World War II was the major trigger to bring about the creation of Israel, and the UN. Every Prime Minister since the “Rothschild friend” Churchill has played their part in the treasonable take over of our country, and who is the one continuity figure that links them all together? Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, 60 glorious years, god bless her.

So, Thatcher is dead, but she will live on forever, for better or worse.

This cartoon by Gerald Scarfe wasn’t thought of as bad taste when first published, so it seem the right time to show it again.

thatcherhanging2

Prince William Tries To Kiss Little Girl – OMG

What the hell is this all about? And for that matter who the hell does Prince William think he is, apart from a future King of course.

williamI just find it astonishing how these people think they can get away with this sort of behaviour! Prince William out and about with Princess Goldsmith thinks it’s OK to molest a small child in public. When I saw this on the news, I’m sure I heard him say, “do you want a kiss” before lunging at Shona Ritchie, a four-year-old Glaswegian. He then proceeds to grab hold of the child and try to plant a Royal smacker on her

Shona, a girl of impeccible taste rightly rebuffed Williams advances, and good on her.

Haven’t you been reading the papers recently? You’re not the Pope laddie, you can’t just go up to children in the street and start grabbing  and slobbering all over them. Whatever next?

I’m sure her mum had no real objection at all, but it made me laugh.

William, a descendant of Vlad The Impaler, looking like he's going for the girls throat!

William, a descendant of Vlad The Impaler, looking like he’s going for the girls throat!

Queen Gets Over 16 % Pay Rise. How’s The Recession For You?

Why so happy?

Why so happy?

How’s it going out there? Are your pips hurting yet? You bet your sweet life they are because this whole economic disaster we are living through was designed to bring us to our knees.

So it’s with no surprise that my blood (not blue) is boiling when I read that Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, aka Mrs Philip Battenberg, aka Elizabeth Windsor, aka Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, is set for a pay rise, up from £31,000,000 to £36,100,000.

Hang on a sec, if I remember how to do this, anyone got a calculator?

So we divide 100 by 31,000,000

calc1

Which gives us

Calc2

Then multiply by 36,100,000

calc3

That’s 16.45161290322580645161290322581 %. Let’s not be finicky about it, rounded down it’s 16.45%.

Is it me or is something very wrong here? Decent hard working people are freezing to death in their beds, while the Royals get 16.45%. Look, I’m sorry to break it to you people, but she has a personal wealth far in excess of anything you or I could imagine, and the details of it are kept from us by law.

The whole system stinks, and what do we do, rush out and buy flags to wave whenever she appears within spitting distance.

Wake up to the stupidity of it. This is wrong, wrong, wrong, and it has to change.

Queen gets a pay rise after receiving another £5million of taxpayers’ money for official duties

Paedophilia is not the problem, it’s just part of the problem.

illuminati2So, why have I not been active on here for a few days?  No biggie really, but just now and again you need to step away from the negative and recharge your batteries. Running a site like this can become very obsessive, and actually take over your life. I tend to blog late evenings, so no worries there, but I also have to earn money to live.

Apart from a full time job, I run other sites and online activity to help keep the wolf from the door. Alternative media, self-hosted sites like this one actually cost money to run, not even thinking about man hours. We could run it on WordPress .com for free, but self-hosting gives us total control and flexibility.

Yes, we do openly ask for donations, but that simply doesn’t happen often enough to cover the overheads. We have reluctantly put adsense back on the site, which helps a little, but the truth is, in order to maintain Piereport-news.com, Alternative News Network and Breaking the Machine, I need to spend time keeping the other stuff active.

I had considered closing PieReport-News (stupid name anyway) because Alternative News Network has taken off so well, bringing all of the good stuff together in one place, and needing very little maintenance, but keeping PieReport going does give me the freedom to kick off, and still receives good traffic.

Bottom line is that my reason for running PieReport-News is still very real. I understand much of what is going on and have taken the decision to step away from their system. Just by being aware gives you so much power. Understanding that it is all one big control game allows you to play by your own rules. If we can wake up just a few people to the real truth behind the global control system, then it’s all worth it.

I know the current topic is largely Paedophilia, and well done to everyone involved in yesterdays “#paedobritain” twitter storm, which was a brilliant success. To Madlands, you did a great job and must channel your energies in whichever way you feel best. But Paedophilia is not the main story, it is just part of a much bigger battle. We have spent a lot of time writing about it because it still has the potential to expose the evil controlling us, for what they really are.

What has to be exposed is the truth behind the matrix. Every part of our world is controlled by a few elite in the very darkest corners of reality. The TV we watch, the money we earn, food, media, entertainment, industry, health, religions, government, education, everything is under their control. Understand that simple truth and it all becomes clear. Whilst I live in the system, I am free of their control because I understand what the truth is. That’s all it takes, choosing to be free.

So we will continue, but as I always say, don’t just read this and expect others to fight for you, do something yourself to break this evil system.

The Queen, ITV. The Royal Propaganda Machine Rolls On.

Yes I did watch the Queen on ITV last night, which is unusual for me to watch TV, although I did enjoy Mr Selfridge, and am probably one of the few who record Dallas, just for old times sake. (we all need a bit of escapism)

My wife was astonished that I showed any interest in the program, but as I explained to her, you need to understand all sides of the debate to form an opinion.

I’m not going to go into the program in great depth here, you can watch it on ITV player, but for me it just underpinned how totally detached they still are from the real world. The great thing is that you don’t need to subscribe to Ickes reptilian theory to see them for what they are.

There were parts I really enjoyed, the lack of any interview with the pathetic Prince Edward was a huge bonus. While talking about the James Bond skit, it was made very clear that they agreed as long as it didn’t become another “It’s A Royal Knockout”. That was a lovely moment, and not only shows that they have never forgiven him for that shambolic disaster, but a subliminal nod to distance themselves from Stuart Hall as well, classic. Talking of Prince Edward, will someone please tell me why?.  When I say why, I ask that on every level, why? The even gave him a title for a part of the world that doesn’t exist.

Look, you, your friends and family are suffering and it isn’t going to get any better. Tell me one thing that she has done to ease your suffering? When you look at the amount of money the Royal Machine costs to keep this extended inbred family poncing off us, with sycophantic people bowing and scraping to their every whim.

They are at the very top of the evil system that is slowly killing off humanity. No I’m not a republican either, I just refuse any longer to be part of the brain washed majority who accept this as normal. Break up the Royal machine and use the unimaginable wealth they have acquired to give back to the people what has been stolen from them. As I said yesterday, there is no need for anyone in the world to be starving to death, it’s time we stood up and removed the elite families from the global control system.

Their days are numbered, and they know it, which is why 2 hours of prime time TV was taken up by this stuff. Get hold of any of Ickes books explaining how the corrupt system works, he’s been saying it for 21 years, you may not like him, but the truth is sometimes painful.

The Unlawful Killing of Princess Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed

Posted at the request of The Rebel.org

unlawfulkilling

A call to arms to all anti-NWO activist: Resist royal cyber-bullying with all available means

Three days ago, the Rebel Site got taken offline by its hosting firm under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. The offense: I had republished the 2011 British documentary “Unlawful Killing” produced by Allied Star, a London-based film company owned by Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Al-Fayed. The documentary implicates – amongst other things – the British royal family in the murder of the couple and its cover-up.

Youtube and Vimeo had already deleted the video a few weeks earlier, forcing me to host it directly on the Rebel Site. Two emails sent to me shortly after by the lawyers of my hosting firm unfortunately got intercepted by the spam filter. In those emails they advised me that they had received a complaint by a London based law firm, claiming the hosting of the video was in breach of their client’s copyrights. Since I didn’t receive the emails I obviously couldn’t comply with their request, forcing my hosting company of 7.5 years to disable the site.

Grudgingly, I deleted the video as demanded to get the site back online as soon as possible. However, I sent a letter back to the lawyers, with a 10 days deadline to provide written evidence that the plaintiff’s law firm was acting on behalf of the copyright owner, Allied Star. I also sent an email to Mohamed Al-Fayed, asking for permission to publish the film. The reply of his office was swift. It confirmed that they had requested the London law firm to make me take down the video. The only reason they gave was that the film had been taken off the market.

It becomes clear, when watching the documentary, that Dodi’s father deeply loved his son and was shattered by his death. Why would he spend millions to produce and promote a documentary on the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death and shortly later take it off the market without giving much reason? The only explanation that makes sense is that he has been put under enormous pressure to do so. Not only has he been bullied to take his film off the market, but the blackmailers made it his problem to prevent others from republishing it.

Personally, I don’t respond well to bullying. I hate bullies and fight them with all available means. Thankfully I’m not alone. In this case of cyber-bullying, resistance is not only civil duty, but easy. Be warned though! It would be illegal to locate a copy of the “Unlawful Killing” documentary via any BitTorrent site and distribute it to as many people as possible. It would be illegal to burn CDs and pass them to all your friends. It would be illegal to upload the video to video hosting sites under its own or slightly altered name. And it would be illegal to create a torrent of your own on BitTorrent sites and share it for other people to download. But it is not illegal, to publish this article, share, email and republish it on your blog, and that’s exactly what I’m asking all of my readers to do. Make it go viral.

The documentary the Windsors don’t want you to watch

Dianas_LetterSo let’s go back to the “Unlawful Killing” documentary and see what all the fuss is about. The film starts by showing a letter from Diana, hand-written to her butler, predicting her own violent death. It says, “My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car. Brake failure & serious head injury.” Less than two years later her prediction came true.

The documentary next shows numerous people saying that her death was murder. Mohamed Al-Fayed, Dodi’s father, goes even further. He goes on record in the documentary saying that it was a slaughter by the ‘bloody racist’ royal family. He thinks the royal family got his son killed because they were too racist to accept a foreign, Muslim step-father or a Muslim half-brother or half-sister for the future king.

The film maker himself, Keith Allen, points out how “chillingly convenient” it was for the Windsors that the crash happened when it did. Mohamed Al-Fayed describes how Diana, in the two weeks she stayed for a holiday with her sons at his house, was worried that exactly that kind of accident would happened to her as it did shortly after. It would appear that she got warned.

The inquest

The documentary mainly focuses on the massive inquest at the Royal Court of Justice, dismissed by several speakers in the film as a cover up. They criticise that Charles, in spite of being implicated by Diana’s letter as trying to kill her exactly the way she died, wasn’t required to appear as a witness. It talks about how the Royal Court of Justice first sought to conduct the inquest without a jury, an attempt that got only overturned because of public pressure. It questions the impartiality of an inquest conducted at the Royal Court of Justice led by a “coroner” who has sworn his allegiance to the Queen, in a case where members of the royal family are the prime suspects. Not very surprising then for the film maker that the coroner appeared at times to have already made up his mind about the outcome of the inquest, before it had even started.

The whole point of the inquest was to examine the suspicious circumstances surrounding the car crash. Was it a pure coincidence that Diana had told many people that she had been warned by a confidential source in the palace, that Prince Philip had plans to deliberately kill her in a car crash, exactly the way she died? Why didn’t the CCTV cameras along the route of the crash car apparently record anything, a ‘coincidence’ the crash shares with the 7/7 London Tube attacks? Were the driver’s blood samples tampered with to make him appear wildly drunk while seeming to be sober? Why were Diana’s phone calls being bugged by the American NSA? Why were Diana’s seat belts jammed on the night of the accident, preventing her from – as she normally would – wearing a seat belt, which probably would have saved her life? Why didn’t the police identify the owners or driver of any of the five other vehicles involved in the crash? And why did it take ambulances 2 hours to transport Diana to the nearest hospital?

According to the film, the suspicious circumstances didn’t stop there. Even before the end of the medical examination of his body, the French press already published headlines according to which the driver was “as drunk as a pig”. That’s in spite of the fact that according to his hotel bill he had only had 2 Ricards, less than a quarter the amount of what French authorities claimed that he had drunk. Road sweepers were allowed by the Police to clean the site of the car crash, within hours of the accident. The film points out the similarity to the case of the Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto, where the site of his murder was hosed down by police almost immediately after the attack, obviously because it is easier to claim it was just an accident if the evidence is washed away.

At the end of the inquest, the jury had heard so much suspicious information that the coroner heading the inquest could not take any risk. In his three day instructions to the jury, he told the jury to ignore the eye-witness statements and forbid the jury to even consider the possibility of murder. The jury, however, ignored the coroners instructions and spent a whole week to carefully examine the evidence for themselves.

The media

The film also examines the negative attitude of the media towards the inquest, obviously considering it to be a waste of time. It was quite common for the journalists observing the inquest to fall asleep or manicure their fingernails instead of paying attention to the witnesses. They were only interested in information confirming the “established consensus”, established before the start of the inquest, that drunk driving and harassment by paparazzi had caused the crash, and ignored all the witness statements contradicting it. Any different view was regarded as “odd” and “conspiracy theory”. Part of the problem, according to the film, was the fact that it was the royal correspondents, not legal journalists who were covering the inquest, in spite of the fact that Diana no longer had royal status at the time of her death. You cannot expect impartiality of journalists like the BBC’s royal correspondent, whose job it is solely to “suck up to the royal family” and portray it in the most favourable light possible. But even if they had wanted to, they wouldn’t have understood the detailed evidence or how the establishment was manipulating behind the scenes which and how much evidence they were allowed to see. That’s why they didn’t question, for example, why the Royal Court censored into incomprehensibility letters of Prince Philip written to Diana. The Royal Court went even as far as forbidding close friends of Diana to tell the inquest about deeply hostile letters of Princess Philip written to Diana not long before her death.

The accident itself

The movie then describes the accident itself based on the reports of several witness statements in the inquest. Diana’s powerful Mercedes Benz quickly left the following paparazzi behind. When they entered the tunnel, they were surrounded by 4 motorcycles and a white Fiat Uno. Suddenly a very bright flashlight blinded Diana’s driver, making him lose control and crash head first into a concrete pillar. None of the other vehicles got ever identified. It’s been verified by the French police that none of the vehicles was driven by any of the paparazzi waiting in front of the hotel that night. They have all been accounted for. That didn’t stop the British media though from misrepresenting the inquest’s verdict – in a massive world-wide misinformation campaign led by the BBC – as saying that it was the following paparazzi who caused the crash. What the inquest actually established was that the vehicles surrounding Diana’s car in the tunnel caused the accident.

The ambulance

The most bizarre circumstance of the accident was probably the behaviour of the ambulance. Several ambulances arrived soon at the scene of the accident. Given the time of the day, after midnight, the streets were virtually empty. And yet, it took the ambulance carrying Diana 81 minutes to drive her to the near-by hospital, without making radio contact with the headquarter. That’s on top of the 37 minutes it took the oddly behaving doctor in sole charge of treating Diana, Jean-Marc Martino, to move the still conscious from the undamaged back of her car into the ambulance. If she had received prompt hospital treatment, the expert witnesses at the inquest all agreed, Diana would have survived.

The role of the MI6

The film coughs at the claim by the head of MI6 towards the inquest that his agency has never killed anyone in the past 50 years. It shows former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson, an inquest witness, who has written a book titled “The Big Breach” describing how MI6 had planned to murder the Serbian leader exactly the same way how Diana, Dodi and her driver were killed: making his car crash in a narrow tunnel by flashing a very bright light into the driver’s eyes. The MI6 boss was obviously lying, a view supported in the film by another former senior MI6 agent, Baroness Daphne Park, who clearly states that she’s been involved in murders on behalf of the MI6.

Diana’s campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines

According to the film, MI6 and other secret services had more reason to want Diana dead than just her plan to get married to a Muslim: her highly effective support for the world-wide campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines. Her involvement caused huge anger amongst Western governments and the armament industry. It even caused the British defence minister Nicholas Soames to call Diana on the phone and tell her, “Don’t meddle in things you don’t know anything about. Accidents can happen.”

Diana’s murder happened just three weeks before the Oslo conference to ban anti-personnel mines. Without Diana as the most prominent ambassador of the conference, most of the world’s media no longer bothered to attend. Bill Clinton was the only government leader attending the conference who voted against a world-wide ban on landmines. If Diana had been still alive, he would have to do so while looking into Diana’s eyes. According to the film, many observers believe that’s the real reason why she got killed, but the coroner of the inquest wasn’t interested in that line of thought.

Dodgy autopsy results

The autopsy of the driver, which stated that he was highly drunk, in spite of having had only two Ricards that night and appearing completely sober on the hotel CCTV captured when leaving the hotel, was performed by Professor Dominique Lecomte, a doctor notorious for her involvement in French government cover-ups. Her autopsy was ripped apart by other medical experts as completely incompetent and having made several critical mistakes, as was Dr. Lepin’s result of the blood sample taken of the driver, which was found to have been highly likely tampered with. Professor Lecomte and Dr. Lepin both refused to attend the inquest, after being ordered by the French government to do so to protect the French state’s secrets and interests. When specialist later wanted to examine whether the DNA of the blood samples was identical with that of the driver, they were told by the French government that those samples no longer exist.

Police corruption

Diana had not only spoken to numerous friends about her ex-husband’s family planning to kill her in a car accident and mentioned it in a letter to her butler. She had also written a letter to her lawyer about it who passed it on to the police. In spite of her being later killed exactly in the way described in her letter, the chief of police kept the letter concealed for three years, knowingly breaking the law by concealing this devastating evidence. He was rewarded handsomely by the Queen by being made a ‘Lord’.

Not only did the autopsy report make false accusations about the driver’s alcohol level, it even suggested that he was a severe case of alcoholic. The English police tried to support this false claim by searching the driver’s apartment twice for alcohol. The first time they went there, they could only find a bottle of champagne and a ¾ empty bottle of Martini. Unsatisfied with the result they went in again, and this time they found enough alcohol to stock an entire bar.

Diana’s embalmment

In spite of no longer being ‘Royal’ at the time of her death, Diana was embalmed within hours of her death, according to the film, to make it impossible to perform a pregnancy test. Not only were her organs removed and destroyed, but so was the blood sample taken from her at her arrival at the Paris hospital. The film suggests that this was to avoid any suggestion that Muslim blood had entered the royal blood lines.

The Queen’s private secretary

Sir Robert Fellowes was the highest ranked representative of the Windsors appearing at the inquest. Under oath, he claimed to have been on holidays for the entire period before and after the accident. Yet, the diary of Tony Blairs’ press secretary Alastair Campbell clearly states that she met Mr Fellowes on several occasions through the period he claimed to have been on holidays. Diana had mentioned to friends before that he was one of the three people she was most afraid of. She believed that Mr Fellowes hated her with a passion and wanted her out of the Royal family. The film suggests that Mr Fellowes had a leading role in the arrangements for her death.

The Fiat Uno

The prime suspect to have caused the crash is the driver of the Fiat Uno which was seen by numerous witnesses. Neither the English nor the French police was apparently able to identify him, and yet one of the best known paparazzi, James Andanson, with connections to secret services, drove exactly that kind of car. Andandon who made a fortune selling pictures of British royalties and other celebrities to the media, lived in France and was known to have followed Diana and Dodi in their last holiday before the accident. He was not part of the paparazzi crowd waiting in front of the Ritz hotel owned by Dodi’s father. When interviewed by French police about his whereabouts, he made contradictory statements, as did his wife and son who served as his alibis. In spite of these circumstances, the investigation against him was dropped and the search for the Fiat Uno ended without result. The inquest made no further attempt to establish who was driving the implicated car.

In 2000, Andason was found dead in his blazing car on a Ministry of Defense owned field outside Montpellier. He had no car keys with him and the two firemen who found him had seen two bullet holes in his skull. The French police however decided that he had committed suicide. The film maker comments that you don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to find it hard to believe that a man shot himself in the head twice and then set his car on fire.

Royal family

The last third of the film goes in full attack on the Windsors. It criticises the huge cost to British tax payers, their racism towards non-Whites and their initial strong support for Hitler. It accuses the Queen mother, her husband, as well as Prince Philip and his sisters to have been highly supportive of Nazi Germany, at least initially. It goes on to ask why the British people still tolerates the monarchy. It accuses British officials of corruption because they were more loyal to the monarch than to the people and care more about earning a knighthood than obeying the law. The film goes even as far as calling the British royal family mafia-style gangsters.

Later in the film Prince Philip is quoted as saying that if reincarnation existed he would like to be reborn as a deadly virus, so he could do something about over-population. This quote must be seen in the context of Prince Philip being the highest ranked Scottish Rite Freemason, a secret society known to aim for a ‘big cull’ reducing mankind to a ‘sustainable level’ of 500 million, that is a reduction of 93%.

The most controversial part of the documentary is an interview with leading British clinical psychologist Oliver James, describing Prince Philip as someone without any internal sense of right or wrong. According to James, Prince Philip is completely selfish and does not care about anybody else. In his expert opinion, Prince Philip is on par with notorious psychopathic mass-murderers.

Summary

The main film very convincingly argues that – in the light of the long list of suspicious circumstances and cover-ups – it would be too much of a coincidence that Diana got killed exactly at a time when Western secret services and armament manufacturers were infuriated about her anti-personnel landmine campaign and the Windsors about the prospect of a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King.

My own first reaction, when I heard about Diana’s death, was to say that it was staged by the MI6. Like Mohamed al-Fayed and other people in the documentary, I suspected that the British royalties were too big bigots to let her get married to a Muslim man from the Middle-East. What I didn’t know back then was that Diana’s mother was a born Rothschild, making her and her children Jews according to Jewish law. I’m more inclined now to think that her murder was performed by Mossad, not so much to stop her anti-personnel mine campaigning or to avoid a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King, but to prevent Diana from converting to Islam, which she would have to get married to a Muslim man. This obviously would have spoiled the endless Jewish bragging over the future British King being a Jew.

Citizen Arrest Warrants Issued today to Detain former Pope, Queen of England and other church-state officers – Property and Assets to be Seized


Brussels:

Thirty officials of church and state who were convicted last week of committing and concealing Crimes against Humanity in Canada have defied a lawful Court Order, and now face immediate arrest.

Today, The International Common Law Court of Justice has issued an International Citizens Arrest Warrant, of one year duration, authorizing the detaining and imprisonment of these thirty fugitives from justice under the terms of the Court Verdict of February 25, 2013.

A copy of the stamped and sealed Citizens Arrest Warrant is attached.

The public seizure of the property and assets of the guilty parties and their organizations will also commence today, in Canada, the United States, England and Italy, in accordance with the Court Order.

The fugitive criminals include Catholic, Anglican and United Church officers in Canada, corporate and RCMP officials, and the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. But they also include former Pope Joseph Ratzinger, three top Cardinals in Vatican City, the head of the Jesuit Order, and the Queen of England and the Archbishop of Canterbury.

“These convicted felons can hide all they want, but their church property can’t” said Calvin Hodges, a Common Law Court Peace Officer in Canada who will lead church occupations there.

“We’ve declared them Public Enemies for killing thousands of Indian children, protecting child rapists, and covering up their filth. If we can’t arrest them right away, then we’ll ban them and these churches from our communities.”

The Court and its sponsoring body, the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS), are issuing Public Notices today in fifteen countries declaring the Thirty to be wanted criminals who pose a Clear and Present Danger to children and citizens, and asking for the help of other governments and citizens to detain them.

The Citizen Arrest Warrant is being issued to local Citizen Action groups, authorizing them to arrest the Thirty and seize their property.

Local regular police authorities in Canada, England, the United States and Italy have been formally asked by the Court to cooperate in enforcing its Order.

Ongoing church occupations will continue indefinitely and will involve an International Week of Reclamation leading up to Easter Sunday, between March 24 and 31, 2013.

Issued by ITCCS Central – Brussels
5 March, 2013

warrant1

warrant2

warrant3

warrant4

Read More

It’s Enough To Give You The Shit’s. Queen in Hospital.

Queen-Elizabeth_full_600

I’m starting too many posts with “You’ve got to laugh”, sorry.

You’ve got to laugh, not that the Queen has a dose of the “BT’s”, that’s covered very well in other gutter blogs Read More: No what amused me today is the spin put on this whole load of shyte. “Queen refuses to take an Ambulance to hospital”, “doesn’t want to make a fuss” as if she is some type of hero.

Difficult choice, use an ambulance, or chauffeur driven royal car to be taken to the best private hospital in the country. I bet the nurses are really bricking it in case any radio stations phone up pretending to be Prince Charles “Errrr, one is wondering how Mummy is today” (touching cuff link, jaw slightly to one side).

Anyway, I wonder if this has anything to do with the whole “Pope, Queen and Canadian Prime Minister found Guilty of Crimes against Humanity and Sentenced to Twenty Five Year Prison Terms” story so wonderfully ignored by the main stream media. Makes you think doesn’t it, after all Ratty has disappeared up his own papal conclave. Anyone know how Stephen Harper is doing?

Did The Rothschild’s Hijack The British Monarchy?

Many years ago in his first book “Truth Vibrations” David Icke described a strange experience where information would make itself available if you asked for it. Well that happens very regularly when you run a site like this one. It must be some universal law of “seek and you will find”.
It all started while I was thinking about Mark Zuckerberg. I’ve always felt that he bears a striking resemblance to Nat Rothschild. It’s something about the eyes. Anyway, dismissing that as nothing more than coincidence, especially as Zuckerberg is usually linked to the Rockefellers, isn’t David alleged to be his grand daddy?, it got me thinking about another similarity that’s been rattling around in my mind for some time.
Look at these two people

Duke Of Kent

Lord Rothschild

Lord Rothschild

 

 

 

 

 

perhaps it’s just me, but there seems more than a passing resemblance to Masonic Duke of Kent, and Lord Rothschild, he’s the one on the right with a lump of white phlegm in the corner of his mouth.

OK, so this is my train of thinking. I read somewhere that Queen Victoria, The Duke of Kent’s great great grand mother, is the illegitimate child of Lionel de Rothschild. I know you won’t find that in the history books, but guess which family wrote most of them. Lord Rothschild’s great great grandfather ( I think that’s enough greats, I may have missed one) is the very same Lionel de Rothschild.

Well blow me down with a feather, isn’t it odd that most of the Royal children don’t resemble each other, but these two do? I love genetic coincidence. I was happy to leave it there, until I received a link from a reader, to some information, which if correct, explains everything.

It is alleged that Prince Albert was a homosexual, Queen Victoria was indeed the daughter of Lionel de Rothschild, not only were all of Alberts children fathered by Nathan Mayer Rothschild, Lionels son and her half brother, but she also had a child before Albert came along, who’s descendants are the true heirs to the throne of England.

So Bertie’s real Dad is alleged to be Nathan de Rothschild. Lets have a look at Bertie and Rothschilds son Walter

 

edwardVII_big

Edward VII (Bertie)

Walter de Rothschild

Walter de Rothschild

.

 

 

Spookie!

 

Oh, and to top it all off, Lord Louis Mountbatten is alleged to be Peter Sellers real father, and Peter Sellers was aware of the big Royal secret.

Below is the link to the interview with Gregg Hallett.

 

Read more:

Special thanks to Frank Imrecht for sending the details.

 

 

The Globalist Agenda

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” – “The First Global Revolution”, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider 1991

Have you ever thought something is wrong? Have you ever thought you were being lied to by your politicians, government, teachers? Have you ever thought you were being manipulated by the television? Have you ever wondered about how the world really works? Have you ever caught the media in a lie? Do you want to know how money really works? Have you ever wondered what the elite of this world believe and where they are taking us? Here you will have an opportunity to at least get a first glimpse at the true nature of the world and how we have been misled and deceived at every level. This site is not the end all and be all but it’s a start.

The Globalist Agenda represents a plan to bring all of Earth’s inhabitants under the control of a single, global state. There is a small, but powerful group of individuals who are the architects and instigators behind the formation and implementation of this “New World Order”. Using their influence through international organizations such as the IMF, World Bank, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the United Nations, NATO, and hundreds of other non-governmental organizations, the objective of these internationalists is nothing less than the subjugation of everyone on the planet as servants to a one world government (servants means slaves). A government run by the same small group of elite that have ruled the masses for a very long time under various guises. These elite are the descendents of those that ruled for at least the past 2 centuries – kings and queens, bankers, robber barrons, priests, and assorted subservient oligarchs and media representatives. Their desire for a return to a one world feudal state should come as no surprise to anyone who has read a little history. It is their nature after all.

In the modern manifestation these people can be seen as kings and queens, international bankers, the military industrial complex and their servants – the corporate CEOs, scientists, professors, lawyers, heads of NGO’s, politicians, and media leaders – all of whom the elite control partially or completely. Sad but true – you can buy or brainwash most national bankers, soldiers, beaurocrats, CEOs, scientists, lawyers, NGOs, politicians and journalists to say what you want them to say.

If you allow their plans to proceed, you will see how under the guise of keeping us all safe with anti-terrorist laws, the globalists will see all citizens gradually and incrementally lose their civil liberties preventing any dissent against either the government or the ruling elite who give the government their orders. The purpose of this website is to first provide a concise base of knowledge explaining the historical origins and mechanisms of the “one-world government” plan, and second, to provide avenues of resistance and methodologies for survival within the Chaos purposely imposed within this plot to enslave all of humanity.

Read More

Paedophilia, Buckingham Palace, Barclays Bank, Lord Peter Carrington, Drug Trafficking, Bilderberg. As David Icke Says “Join the Dots”.

EIR David Icke has always maintained that Paedophilia is the cement that holds the Globalist control system together. The truths behind this statement are so shocking that they are simply unbelievable by the vast majority of the population, which is one of the reasons why that get away with it.

By far the best way to hide something is to do it in plain view, distracting peoples attention by slight of hand. Jimmy Savile was an expert at this with everyone holding their hands up shouting “why didn’t we realise what was happening”. Why was he an expert? Because he was taught by the real masters. Savile was not the real brains behind this whole ongoing vile circle of filth. He was nothing more than a paid pimp with fringe benefits.

The only good thing that has come out of the Savile expose, is that at last people are waking up to the truth Icke has been telling for years. It’s been going on for centuries, and is happening now. Do not let the smoke screen investigations currently happening take away this real chance of exposing the evil at the very top of society.

This is a great article written by Scott Thompson in 1983 in EIR. As Icke always says, join the dots. I’ve reproduced it in full, but you can view the whole back catalogue by clicking the image.

 

Will Great Britain’s Paedophile scandal bring down Lord Carrington?

by Scott Thompson EIR 13 December 1983

While former British Foreign Secretary Lord Carrington is expected to be appointed NATO Secretary General at the alliance’s foreign ministers meeting on Dec. 8, the carrington150Carrington appointment is ill-timed, to say the least. Alarm bells have gone off around the current investigation by the British Home Secretary of a paedophile (child-sex) ring involving Carrington’s close associates, the former Home Secretary William Whitelaw, and as yet unnamed members of the Foreign Office. The spokesman noted that since Edward Viii’s abdication, the Profumo scandal, and the recent resignation of Trade and Industry Minister Cecil Parkinson, many political disagreements within Great Britain have been settled by airing sex scandals of the sort now being directed at Lord Peter Carrington.

Well-informed sources in London report that the palace paedophilia scandal grew out of two cases: The first was investigation of a 16-year-old boy who had been seduced and sodomized during Carrington’s tenure at the Foreign Office. The second involves the case of Home Office employee Steven Adrian, the director of an organization called PIE (Paedophilia information Exchange). According to the North American Man-Boy Lovers Association (NAMBLA), a U. S. paedophile lobbying group, NAMBLA’s British affiliate was run by Adrian from his office in the British Home Ministry, until he was fired.

The paedophilia scandal came to public light on Nov. 24 when Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens presented to Home Secretary John Brittan a dossier containing evidence of a “paedophile ring,” which he says has been operating for some time out of Buckingham Palace and the Foreign Office. Dickens’s revelations followed a strong attack from Chief Justice Lord Lane on Great Britain’s “immoral society” a speech at Cambridge University on Nov. 9.

Lord Lane called for a public outcry against a new morality that lets “buggers” be called “gays” and allows children to be exposed to heavy doses of pornographic sex and violence in “video nasty’s.” Lord Lane’s speech appears to be the first salvo in an attempt by a Tory faction which has long opposed Lord Carrington’s détente policy with the Soviet Union, to initiate a public clean-up campaign against homosexuality, paedophilia, and the video nasty’s to which hundreds of thousands of youths between 6 and 16 have been exposed. On the same day that the palace paedophilia scandal broke, an All-Party Parliamentary inquiry led by Lord Nugent released its first report on video nasty’s. The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Coggan, joined Lord Lane in the crackdown.

Well-informed observers believe that this effort may have been started to clean up the rampant homosexuality and child pornography tolerated until now by Britain’s elite, because of the mounting war danger: a danger Carrington and his Foreign Office friends vehemently deny.

Dope, Inc.

The implication of Lord Carrington’s friends at the Foreign Office in a paedophilia ring is not the only scandal hanging over Carrington. The paedophilia question opens a Pandora’s box of international rings that specialise in child sexual exploitation, but are also involved in the illegal drug traffic that operates above the level of nations—Dope, Inc. Canington’s ties to the top levels of the dope trade are an open secret.

In his Nov. 9 speech at Cambridge, the Chief Justice Lord Lane cited the fact that 84 percent of all the heroin now seized en route to Great Britain originates with Afghani rebels operating from Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent. This stream of heroin from the “Golden Crescent” is believed by security experts to reveal the footprints of a “drugs-for-guns” trafficking operation set up by Lord Carrington. In 1981 when he was British Foreign Secretary, Lord Carrington had sought to oust U.S. intelligence control over the Afghani rebel movement, to gain a bargaining chip with the Soviets.

barclays_logo_122The massive drug-running of the Carrington-backed Afghani exiles based in the Peshwahr and Baluchistan regions of Pakistan also involves opium production in Soviet-held sections of Afghanistan. Such arrangements are not new to Lord Carrington. Before becoming Foreign Secretary he sat at the center of British involvement in Dope, Inc., the $500 billion international illegal narcotics cartel. In 1967 Lord Carrington joined the board of Barclay’s Bank, exposed in the 1978 book “Dope, Inc”. as the premier British bank involved in multi-billion dollar offshore laundering of dirty money from drug trafficking and other organized crime activities. Barclay’s is part of a nexus that includes the Oppenheimer family interests which cartelized international gold and diamond markets, the main commodities used in illegal drug and gun deals. The Oppenheimer interests, including Anglo-American Gold Company and De Beers, have made similar cartel arrangements for Soviet production of these commodities.

At the time he joined Barclay’s, Lord Carrington was on the board of Hambros Bank, which was involved in joint ventures with the former Vatican banker Michele Sindona, now imprisoned in the United States. His position with Hambros brought Lord Carrington into the circles of the Propaganda-2 masonic lodge of Italy, pinpointed by Italian magistrates as responsible for every major coup attempt, assassination, and terrorist act since the late- l960s’ NATO- linked “strategy of tension” in Italy.

Implicated in the “strategy of tension” from the U.S. end was former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a business partner in Carrington’s firm Kissinger Associates, Inc. Kissinger has been named in Italian court testimony as a member of the Monte Carlo Lodge set up by P-2 Grand Master, financier Licio Gelli, and as having threatened Italian Christian Democratic Party president Aldo Moro before his murder by P-2-linked terrorists.

Although Lord Lane only touched superficially on certain leads in his mention of Golden Crescent heroin production in Pakistan, it is notable that one of the main trans-shipment routes for this production has more recently been identified as the Bulgarian Connection. Italian magistrates investigating the kidnapping of NATO Gen. James Dozier turned up links between the Red Brigades and the secret services of Bulgaria, fronting for the Soviet KGB. Later, Italian magistrates uncovered the biggest arms-for-drugs nexus ever, protected by P-2 connected banks in Milan, and following the same Gold Crescent gun- and drug-running circuits in which Mehmet Ali Agca was safe-housed before his attempt to kill Pope John Paul II

At the same time Carrington was starting his Afghan operation, U.S. intelligence reported that the British foreign minister entered into collaboration with the Soviet Union in a scheme to assassinate Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, who during his last months of life embarked on a campaign to clean up Dope, Inc.’s arms-for-drugs trafficking in Egypt. Mutual business interests with Moscow’s KGB may explain why Lord Carrington’s circles are reported to have again offered to partition Iran with the Soviet Union. It would also help explain why, according to British sources, it is Lord Carrington’s circles who have advised Britain to withdraw from the international peacekeeping force, at a time when Soviet- backed Syria has consolidated control over the greater part of Lebanon, including, of course, the hashish and opium-producing Bekaa valley.

Carrington at NATO would not only be a strategic disaster, but a walking time-bomb ready to explode into a bigger scandal than the Profumo affair. Security experts have long warned that the sexually deviant behaviour of Lord Carrington’s associates, recorded by multiple intelligence agencies, including his would-be negotiating partners in the KGB, represents a massive security risk. Now, it appears that some members of Great Britain’s establishment second this judgment.

This article was written before Carrington served 4 years as Secretary General of NATO. He served under four prime ministers, McMillan, Home, Heath and Thatcher. He also chaired Bilderberg  for several years in the late 1990s.

 

Thanks to #Fernbridge for Tweeting the info.