Ministers launch PR drive to shake off ‘Frankenstein food’ image of GM crops.

Pie’s Comment:
Read this in today’s Mail. Prepare for loads more of this normalising of genetically modified stuff. Thye will dip feed this until the “Sheeple” think it’s OK to eat food made out of human embryo’s or whatever disgusting crazy stuff they dream up.

  • Environment Secretary Owen Paterson says the government ‘must not be afraid’ of pushing genetically modified food
  • In Oxford Farming Conference Speech he admits public still needs reassurance that GM is safe
  • Minister also calls for Olympic backing of Team GB to get behind Britain’s farmers to cut the level of imported food

By MATT CHORLEY, MAILONLINE POLITICAL EDITOR

PUBLISHED: 10:15, 3 January 2013 | UPDATED: 10:53, 3 January 2013

A PR campaign to change the image of genetically modified food is to be launched by the government.

Environment Secretary Owen Paterson wants farmers, scientists and ministers to increase the appeal of so-called Frankenstein Foods among the public.

In a speech today to the Oxford Farming Conference, Mr Paterson insists there are ‘great opportunities’ in pushing GM technology , but admitted the public need reassurance that it is safe.

Since last summer’s reshuffle, Mr Paterson has repeatedly backed GM’s role in keeping food supplies secure.

He has dismissed complaints as ‘humbug’ and claimed ‘there isn’t a single piece of meat being served [in a typical London restaurant] where a bullock hasn’t eaten some GM feed’.

GM crops were grown on 395 million acres in 29 countries in 2011, according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

In today’s speech Mr Paterson said: ‘I fully appreciate the strong feelings on both sides of the debate. GM needs to be considered in its proper overall context with a balanced understanding of the risks and benefits.

‘We should not, however, be afraid of making the case to the public about the potential benefits of GM beyond the food chain, for example, significantly reducing the use of pesticides and inputs such as diesel.

 

Advertisements

Massive Food Shortages On The Way. Banks Buying Up Wheat & Grain.

wheat-priceWe wrote earlier this year about the hyped drought situation, and how it was a fake ploy to hike up food prices. Well, as predicted there was no drought, hosepipe bans imposed to make us believe this load of garbage were reluctantly removed as more water fell from the sky than has in living memory. (please note, the use of the word “sky” is in reference to the area above our heads and has no connection to BskyB, in case Google or Murdochs News International are planning on taking action regarding copyright grounds. I don’t really want to be sent to ChillingEffects.org.)

Anyway, we had some friends round today for a festive game of “Newmarket” and “Spoons”, and the conversation came round to the wet weather and the effect it will have on food prices. As they work in the farming industry, they seemed to be the right people to get a clear view of the situation. “through the roof” was the response to my question about the wet conditions effects on prices. He then went on to say something very disturbing,  “the price of wheat is going to sky rocket”.  Not his exact words but you get my drift. “How do you know that for certain”, I probed. It transpired that a neighbouring farmer had just sold a massive amount of stockpiled grain to a guy from a major high street bank!  “If those f—–s are buying up the stuff, it can only mean one thing, massive f—–g price rises on the cards”

So there you are, the banksters who forced this economic crisis on us (all planned), are now buying up the raw materials for our daily bread. And, if this is true, they must be doing the same everywhere, with anything they can use against us for profit.

Happy new year everyone.

 

Newtown School Shooting Story Already Being Changed By The Media

To eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooterMike-adams-health-ranger2

Mike Adams
Natural News
December 15, 2012

The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.

As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question: “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?”

One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.

According to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”

Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.

Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being “scrubbed” from the news

As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.

FoxNews reported that this second gunman was “led out of the woods by officers” and then questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut Post.

A local CBS affiliate was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said “Police believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon van with its back window blown out…”

ABC News also originally reported, “A second gunman is apparently at large. Car-to-car searches are underway.”

A local CT CBS affiliate was also reporting, “CBS News reports that a potential second shooter is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and telling parents on the scene, ‘I did not do it.’”

But the more recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a second gunman and going with the “lone gunman” explanation, which holds about as much water as the “lone gunman” explanation of the JFK assassination.

“A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning shooting spree,” reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.

NBC News is also now chiming in with the “lone gunman” version of the story, eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the tragic event.

Another story authored by NBC News carries the title, “26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut elementary school.” Once again, no mention of a second gunman as reported by eyewitnesses.

When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy

Journalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?

And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?

This story is continuing to develop, and we’ll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?

For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.

About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health author and award-winning journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, and he has authored and published several downloadable personal preparedness courses including a downloadable course focused on safety and self defense. Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes. In 2010, Adams co-founded NaturalNews.com, a natural health video sharing site that has now grown in popularity. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support consumer advocacy programs. He’s also the founder and CEO of a well known email mail merge software developer whose software, ‘Email Marketing Director,’ currently runs the NaturalNews email subscriptions. Adams also serves as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a non-profit consumer protection group, and regularly pursues cycling, nature photography, Capoeira and Pilates. Known as the ‘Health Ranger,’ Adams’ personal health statistics and mission statements are located at www.HealthRanger.org

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.html#ixzz2F84B8h5M

Activist Mother Launches National Movement Boycotting GMOs

(NaturalNews) Occasionally, an outraged citizen turns on the establishment and starts a grass roots national campaign. One such citizen is Connecticut mother Diana Reeves. She quit her promising career with an upscale accounting firm to take care of her young son with cancer, who died before turning five.

With her other two children suffering from health problems, Diana channeled her grief into researching food and its relationship to health, including the effect on health from GMOs.

Her concern and curiosity eventually led her to getting involved with local activist groups NonGMO Hartford and the Connecticut Right to Know group which was pushing for state mandated GMO labeling.

Working with those groups, Diana vigorously campaigned with emails and leaflet handouts to get Connecticut citizens behind that state’s proposed congressional bill HB 5117, which included a provision requiring GMO labeling in Connecticut.

The Connecticut Right to Know campaign had garnered overwhelming public support for the provision to label GMOs, and they were certain the provision would be a slam dunk in the State’s House of Representitives.

But at the eleventh hour, the GMO labeling provision was taken out of the bill.

How Diana dealt with her state legislators’ cave-in

Connecticut legislators went down the same path as Vermont’s state legislation by caving in to “industry pressures” that are supported by pro-biotech industry friendly federal legislators, federal agency members, and high court judges.

Industry pressures included the threat of getting sued by the extremely litigious Monsanto, who have left a trail of ruined farmers and farms from frivolous lawsuits rivaled only by General Sherman’s scorched earth march through the South during the Civil War.

That’s when an outraged Diana took the bull by horns. The lead bull for the stampeding GMO biotech industry is Monsanto, of course, voted by Natural News overwhelmingly in a readers’ 2011 readers’ poll as the most evil corporation (http://www.naturalnews.com/030967_Monsanto_evil.html).

Diana’s story and burgeoning grass roots emailing campaign was featured in a recent Organic Consumers’ Association (OCA) newsletter. It is called GMO Free USA. She intends to gather 5,000 or more who oppose GMOs in the food supply to initiate emails directly at food manufacturers.

“The more people who join this consumer email initiative, the more powerful the campaign will be,” she asserts. So here’s a chance for many of us to contribute to a concerted effort without demonstrating in the streets and risking injury or incarceration while being ignored by the main stream press.

You can find out more and get involved with Diana’s GMO Free USA effort via:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/GMOFreeUSA/

Why every anti-GMO effort is important

It’s amazing how many food consumers are still clueless about GMOs and their ramifications that endanger the future of our food supply in addition to their immediate health.

If you visit Diana’s GMO Free USA facebook page or their Yahoo Group, you’ll see that part of her effort is to educate more in addition to flood food producers and legislators with emails.

Not sure if you should contribute to the cause? Did you know that GMO contamination is rampant and the USDA’s National Organics Program (NOP) cannot guarantee there’s no contamination of certified organic foods? (GMO contamination … farmwars Source below)

The non-profit private group Non-GMO Project is trying to do something about that. (Source below)

Jeffrey Smith, international activist, author of Seeds of Deception and founder of the Institute for Responsible Technology was recently interviewed by Health Ranger Mike Adams – very interesting video here (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=D170A7C686A2BB810D5D9F3FC8473B7A).

Here’s a reason to be concerned about GMOs’ immediate dangers as well as the disastrous long term consequences mentioned by Mike and Jeffrey in the interview (http://www.naturalnews.com/031742_GMOs_dangers.html#ixzz206O4KWaZ).

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036427_GMO_boycott_activists.html#ixzz20FwWg04k

Al Gore, Mr Porkie

If Al Gore is so bothered about the the Planets resources, how come he’s eaten so much of them? Guess who’s not been watching his own Carbon Footprint. Please note that the expression Mr Porkie is not necessarily connected to his alleged massive  size,  but more about the bollocks he spouts about Global Warming  Climate Change Tipping Points.

Porkie is a shortened version of “Porky Pies”, rhyming slang for lies.

Al Gore is rhyming slang for Male Pig

 

Raw Food. Change The Way You Eat. Beat The Corporations Who Want You To Get Sick.

This may seem a strange thing to have in a website like Piereport-News, but the fact is that food & diet is one of the ways the globalists suppress us.We have been conditioned to eat food in an unnatural way to maximise input and minimise benefit. What I mean by that is our food today is so processed our bodies cannot cope with processing the sludge we stuff down our throats.

 It takes much more processed food to gain the nutriments we need to survive, our bodies are tricked into thinking that we are starving because it isn’t getting the correct nutrition, so makes you feel hungry before you really need to eat, and because it’s in starvation mode, it stores as much fat as possible.

We become over weight due to the fat storing survival mechanism of the body,and constantly tired and listless because we are simply not feeding the body machine with the correct fuel. One of the simplest ways to gain the best nutrition from food is to eat it raw.

The raw food diet has been around quite a while but when it comes to living a raw food lifestyle there is still some confusion about the type of foods you can consume and how they will benefit your body.

While many start eating a raw food diet to lose weight there are many other benefits that should be considered. Among them is the fact that it can help you live a longer and healthier life. By it’s very nature raw food has not been processed so ounce for ounce it is better fuel.

With today’s busy (on the go) lifestyle and so many pre-packaged ready to eat foods available the simple truth is that most of people eat way too much in the way of processed food. In fact, most of us don’t even stop to think about what we’re putting into our bodies. We eat to satisfy the hunger pangs, not to fuel our body and mind.

When it comes to consuming a raw food diet it simply means consuming food in its natural, unprocessed form. There are many very good reasons why this is a good idea. For example, processing and cooking food can take a large amounts of the nutritional of value away from the foods we eat. To every other species on the planet, food is fuel and consumed in it’s natural form.We however, mess about with it, add chemicals and colourings, cook it until it contains little or no goodness, and complain that we are over weight and sick.

Do you ever remember hearing your mother or grandmother say “don’t peel your carrots or potatoes”? They were right! They told you this because they knew that most of the nutrients are in or just under the surface of the skin. This holds true for almost all of the fruits and vegetables that we consume, with a few exceptions. We will talk more about those later.

A common misconception is that consuming a raw food diet means that you can’t eat anything cooked ever again. When in reality it doesn’t mean that at all. You don’t have to eat everything raw. It simply means that at least 75% of the food that you eat should be unprocessed and uncooked. What this means is that if you can have 25% of your food cooked, ie meat etc and the other 75% raw, you will be well on the way to a better diet. Now, I haven’t eaten meat for 18 years so this isn’t too much of an issue, but, I don’t like raw potatoes, so those I cook.

The mainstay of the diet will consist of eating unprocessed, uncooked, organic, whole foods, such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, legumes, dried fruits, seaweeds, etc.

Did you know that cooking your food not only removes some of the nutrition, but it also takes away a lot of the flavour? So we add seasoning by way of salt, sugar and sauces which give us nothing but problems.

A raw food diet means eating more the way our healthier and more fit ancestors did. They cooked very little, and certainly didn’t cook or process fruits and vegetables. They ate them raw! When you stop to think about eating a raw food diet it only makes sense. It’s how our bodies were meant to consume and process food for nutrition and energy.

There are many benefits to eating to a raw food diet, as we will discuss further in future posts. Just keep in mind that when you begin eating a raw food diet you will notice that your metabolism will work better, you will lose excess weight, have more energy and enjoy the benefits of better health. So what do you have to lose? There are tough times ahead, one of the ways we need to prepare for this is to get healthy.

Make sure you look for call back to PieReport-News soon. In the next post I will be talking more about why you should consider switching to a raw food diet.