Nick Clegg, Liar Or Not Fit For Purpose. Said He Knew Nothing About Paedophile Cyril Smith.

I know I covered this yesterday, but that was very much a copy and paste, with a bit of Photoshop chucked in for good measure. The more my tiny blog head thinks about this story the more I believe Cleggs stance has cornered him into an impossible position. If he did know about Cyril Smith pre Simon Danczuk’s revelations, he is simply a liar. If, as he claims, he didn’t know about the Smith paedo allegations, he is so out of touch with the real world and indeed the liberal half of his own party, what the hell is he doing in the job in the first place. Let’s not forget, Clegg started his political life working for Leon Brittan on the EU gravy train, so it’s not as if he hasn’t been around a bit.
Talking of Leon Brittan, isn’t it rather odd that when you Google Cyril Smith, you get the following suggestions.
google cyril smith

OK, I can understand why Simon Danczuk is there, Jeremy Thorpe, well we all remember the “beam up Scottie” jokes, David Steel, knew Uncle Cyril liked a bit of bare bottom boy spanking, Sidney Cooke, that’s easy, prolific paedophile, but I just can’t put my finger on why Nick Cleggs old boss Leon Brittan is there? When Bill Maloney challenged Nick Clegg about Leon Brittan on budget day, Nick couldn’t remember much about that either.

Anyway, back to Clegg, the Cyril Smith story has been around the MSM since his death. Clegg said that he had never heard of any rumours around Sir Cyril’s behaviour despite the allegations being reported in Private Eye in 1979. All very strange.

The other thing that I found odd today, the Mail did a nice bit about Squirming Cleggie, publishing the following image.

liberals

The byline mentions Smith, Thorpe,& Steel, but totally ignores former leader Jo Grimond, very sloppy if you ask me. Read more

Nick Clegg Knew Nothing About Paedophile Cyril Smith.

ManuelClegg1aIn true Manuel style, Nick Clegg insisted that he “knew nothing” about the paedophile Cyril Smith.

Speaking to Nick Ferrari At Breakfast, the Liberal Democrat leader says he was unaware of abuse claims against the former MP until they were revealed to the Commons in 2012.

Simon Danczuk, current MP in Rochdale where Sir Cyril served, has written an explosive book detailing allegations against the former Liberal MP. Newspaper front pages this morning insisted Mr Clegg must have known about the claims.

But the Deputy Prime Minister told LBC: “The suggestion that I had known any of this, I would have carried on regardless is absurd.

“These are montrous things that appear to have happened and they need to be looked into by the police.”

Mr Clegg said that as soon as Simon Danczuk made the claims in the House of Commons the Party began investigating.

“The Whips’ office in my Party went and spoke to every single current member of the House of Lords and current member of the House of Commons who was around at the time of Cyril Smith and said ‘did you know anything?’ No-one said they did,” Mr Clegg said.

“We even scoured what little documentation there is from that time but remember, as I keep saying, the Party was formed in 1989. Many, many if not most of these events are alleged to have taken place before the Party was formed. There is simply no documentation.”

The Deputy Prime Minister – and father of two young boys – also emphasised that he was only 12 years old at the time the incidents are alleged to have taken place and was outraged at suggestions he could have been aware of them before they became public.

“Do you really think I would have praised Cyril Smith when he died if I even had an inkling of the monstrous things he is alleged to have been doing? It is absurd to suggest that I would have done otherwise.

“I know that people say ‘you must know something’ I can only tell you what I did and didn’t know, I’m not going to start inventing that I knew things that I didn’t know.

“A lot of these things took place many, many, many years ago, many of them actually stretching way back to before I was around, before my Party was around.

“I now read and I heard in late 2012 what Simon Danczuk has said, they’re very serious. It is repulsive, it is repugnant the actions of this man, they need to be looked at, they are of a criminal nature and they need to be looked at by the police.”

However speaking on LBC following this week’s Call Clegg Mr Danczuk was sceptical of the Deputy Prime Minister’s assertions.

“I think it is inconceivable that the leader of the Liberal Democrats would not have heard these rumours. You’ve got to bear in mind, I’ve been researching this issue, we had a Liberal leader of the council in Rochdale back in the ’60s knowing about these allegations.”

Read More

Wogan Comes Out Of The Savile Closet. Too Little & Far Too Late.

Radio 1 DJ's, (left to right) Jimmy Savile, Ed Stewart, Dave Lee

Just in time for the run up to this years hypocritical bunch of celebs cashing in on the early pantomime which is the BBC’s Children in Need, Sir (please remember the knighthood) Terry Wogan has come out attacking Sir (please remember the knighthood) Jimmy Savile.

Wogan, who famously fueled the “Icke is a nutter” campaign by uttering the well rehearsed line, “they’re not laughing with you, they’re laughing at you” is now banging on about how he had a hatred of Jimmy Savile and how his crimes were an open secret at the BBC, oh really Sir Terry Wogan ! Remind me again why you received a knighthood?

In an article published in the Mirror, Wogan recalled a celebrity lunch with journalists revealing that it was common knowledge in the industry what Savile was up to.

“I was sitting at a table having lunch and Savile was sitting one up from me, and also up from me was Jean Rook (the legendary columnist)

“And Jimmy Savile got up to go to the loo, and she looked across at me and said: ‘When are they going to expose him?’

And I said ‘that’s your job.’ And nobody ever did,  even though everyone had heard the rumours.”

Nope, nobody ever did, including you Wogan, which in my book makes you just as bad as the rest of them. Gambaccini’s excuse was that he was just a junior  DJ and Savile was too powerful; doesn’t really apply to you Sir Terry Wogan!  You stand there year after year twisting the guilt button on the great British public to donate cash they can ill afford, knowing full well that the shameful corrupt corporation you are working for is covering up foul crimes taking place within the very building you’re standing  in. And let’s not forget, Savile wasn’t just some dirty old man who liked to touch up a few under age girls as he is often portrayed in the MSM. He was a predatory paedophile, into young boys as will as girls, dead bodies, and not just for his own use. The vile pervert was a high level pimp of young children and at the center of a paedophile ring which goes all the way to the top, and beyond.

wogan hellWhat is really sickening about Wogans remark, telling the now dead Jean Rook “that’s your job” is that he seems to think that makes it OK. Any respect I may have had for Wogan, and to be honest it wasn’t a lot, is gone forever. They all knew what Savile was up to and did nothing. Wonderful Catholic morals Sir Terry.

But it does make you wonder why the likes of Wogan kept schtum.  I’m not of course suggesting that he was implicated in any way, except by dint of keeping quiet.  To make out it was Jean Rooks responsibility and not his is totally unacceptable.

In the article, he digs an even bigger hole by defending Stuart Hall, and the ageist treatment of women at the BBC. I think it’s time to find yourself a little Irish meadow Terry.

Savile with Michael Aspell, who claimed on This Morning that he had never met Savile.

Savile with Michael Aspell, who claimed on This Morning that he had never met Savile.

Sir Terry Wogan speaks of his hatred of Jimmy Savile and says his crimes were open secret at BBC

Veteran TV and radio legend Sir Terry Wogan has spoken of his hatred of Jimmy Savile and how his crimes were an open secret at the BBC.

The 75-year-old broadcaster has told of how he despised Savile and how his horrific legacy of child abuse has “poisoned” the BBC.

He said: “He always struck me as creepy. I’ve talked to people and not one of them has said: ‘I really liked him.’”

The Children in Need host recalled a celebrity lunch with journalists revealing that it was common knowledge in the industry what Savile was up to.

“I was sitting at a table having lunch and Savile was sitting one up from me, and also up from me was Jean Rook (the legendary columnist)

“And Jimmy Savile got up to go to the loo, and she looked across at me and said: ‘When are they going to expose him?’

And I said ‘that’s your job.’ And nobody ever did,  even though everyone had heard the rumours.

“This whole Savile thing has poisoned everything.”

Paedophile Savile preyed on at least 450 children and young people – many on BBC premises as well as dozens who were sick in hospital wards.

The Radio Two DJ says he worked with Savile on Children in Need and Jim’ll Fix it adding: “He had no talent, except for bombast and self-promotion.

“You kind of admired him for doing as well as he’d done, without any talent whatsoever.”

But Sir Terry is more defensive of Stuart Hall who was jailed in the summer for a series of indecent assaults on children describing him as “a good-humoured fella, very ebullient.

“Jolly, hearty, a good broadcaster, a funny man. I’m not trying to excuse him.

“But it will be interesting to see what will happen when all these cases come to court, how many are proved.”

And he is critical of the way he believes the police have conducted the inquiries into high-profile suspects saying: “The police have obviously decided they must ring the press, knock on people’s doors and arrest them in full view.”

Sir Terry, who has worked for the BBC for all his illustrious career, believes the Corporation has become “too big’ but says it is still “the greatest broadcaster in the world.”

But he has little sympathy for older women in broadcasting who have recently protested the BBC is no longer interested in employing them.

“I think a number of people who have been protesting originally got the jobs because of their glamour. It is a visual medium.”

And he adds that the current crop of attractive women presenters like Holly Willoughby and Tess Daly will be “replaced to the next generation of attractive female presenters.”

Read More

Bill Roach Arrested Over Suspicion of Rape In 1967

Bill RoachSo the worst kept secret since Rolf,  is out in the open. Dirty old Ken Barlow, actor Bill Roach has been arrested on suspicion of rape of a fifteen year old in 1967.

Roach, who recently split from his 44 year old girlfriend Emma Jesson (wonder why that was then?), oh that’s right, to  ‘explore a mystic message of love’.

I’ve got to be honest here, I couldn’t really care less. It’s just another historic smoke screen pushed out by the media to try to take the focus off of the real evil vile filth.

Roach has always been slightly odd. A former druid, publicly supported of the awful Neil Hamilton, self confessed womaniser,   and now  into The Pure Love Movement who believe that from 2012 is the start of a ‘golden age’ when war, poverty and famine disappear as people discover a higher meaning. (actually, that sounds like an OK idea to me)

He recently caused controversy  by supporting Michael (stupid name) Levell, and also suggesting that sex abuse victims where repaying some sort of Karmic debt.

OK, if he did rape a 15 year old in 1967, so be it, let the law deal with it, albeit 47 years late, but what about the high profile politicians still walking about scott free? We mustn’t let the real truth be masked by a few geriatric scalps.

The Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher Is Dead

Margaret Thatcher is Dead.

cnn thatcherSo, Margaret Thatcher is dead. This, perhaps not unexpected end to the once Iron Lady has seen an astonishing out pouring of grief and sycophantic drivel in the main stream media. Although I really had a chuckle to myself when CNN didn’t quite get it right and flashed up an image of her with best buddy and long time Christmas house guest, Sir Jimmy Savile. That was either an example of just how stupid they are, or perhaps how clever, who knows.

Although it is nice to see the shot of them supporting the NSPCC again, keep up the good work Chris, “don’t cha know”.

There is no doubt that Thatcher was a great politician, but that in no ways infers that she was a great person. Politicians are masters at manipulation and control, and Thatcher was one of the best.

She always said that one of her greatest successes was Tony Blair, and it is true that she and her Globalist led policies paved the way for the “New Labour” machine of Mandelson, Blair and Brown to destroy this great nation.
It would be wrong and hypocritical of me not to confess that I was once a supporter of Thatcher. She seemed to have a lot going for her. Having lived through the Heath “3 day week” era, another spell of Wilson, and then the disastrous Callaghan, Thatcher appeared to be the leader to pull the UK out of total devastation.

She openly despised Edward Heath, appeared to be more Euro Skeptic than pro Europe, remember the spats with Jacques Delors, and on the surface put the Grate back into Britain.

thatcherHowever, when you look at her more closely, you realise that she was no different to any of this type of controlled pseudo leader, serving her masters very effectively, until she out lived her usefulness.

She broke the unions power, for no other reason than they were the only opposition and stumbling block to the bankers plans for total takeover. Continuing with her Hayekian template, she embarked on a program of privatisation, sold to us as a way for the man in the street to own shares in the utility companies, but which was in truth nothing more than a way to hand over control of essential services like gas and electricity supply to the global control system.

At no time should any essential service be in the hands of profit seeking giant corporations.  How the hell did they get away with privatising water in this country? Will someone please tell me where the competition is?

British Steel, British Petroleum, Rolls Royce, British Airways where all sold off, just look at them now.

But, and even more worrying, behind the scenes there was a much darker side to her. When you consider that all of this was put in place by a government embroiled in paedophile cover ups, with some very dubious characters on the fringes, i.e. Jimmy Savile. Her cabinet was awash with some really perverted people. When you understand the truth that Icke has been saying for years, that Governments are controlled by blackmail, paedophilia being part the cement that holds it all together, you start to understand how it all works, and why so many perverted creatures have such high places in public office.

So, although Thatcher publicly despised known paedpohile Heath, and also appeared to reject his pro Europe approach, she played her own massive part in the long planned  destruction of UK plc. She famously rejected any talk of the UK taking part in the joint Euro currency nonsense, why? Again, she used the keep the British pound argument to her advantage, while all along, the UK was never going to be part of the Euro, with the City of London needing to be kept well away away from it.

Her successor, John Major-Ball, was a bit part player, just to keep things ticking over while the three horsemen of the Apocalypse, prepared for the end game of New Labour, once John Smith was out of the way.

The UK and of course most of the rest of the world is now totally under the control of the global banking families. World War II was the major trigger to bring about the creation of Israel, and the UN. Every Prime Minister since the “Rothschild friend” Churchill has played their part in the treasonable take over of our country, and who is the one continuity figure that links them all together? Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, 60 glorious years, god bless her.

So, Thatcher is dead, but she will live on forever, for better or worse.

This cartoon by Gerald Scarfe wasn’t thought of as bad taste when first published, so it seem the right time to show it again.

thatcherhanging2

Former Church of England priest and retired organist face jail for sexually abusing boys as young as 10.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3: And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Genesis-1-1
4: And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5: And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6: And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7: And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8: And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9: And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
10: And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
11: And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12: And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13: And the evening and the morning were the third day.
14: And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16: And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17: And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18: And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
19: And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
20: And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21: And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22: And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23: And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25: And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30: And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

OK that’s enough, we all know about the Sabbath day, but it does seem like a plan doesn’t it. light and dark, food, water, seeds, fruit, trees, man and woman, W.T.G  god.

But then man created religion, and it all goes tits up, because regional creates pervert priests, vicars and organists, who can’t keep their dirty hands off of little boys.

I really can’t be bothered writing about  Father Keith Wilkie Denford, 78, and Michael Mytton, 69, read more here:

Lord Alistair McAlpine Artist Graham Ovenden Guilty Of Child Sex Offences.

Graham-Ovenden_1507088cGraham Ovenden, is an artist who’s work including naked children was once famously collected by Lord Alistair McAlpine. Remember dear old Alistair? he’s the tax exile ex member of the house of Lords who was named by David Icke as a Paedophile, but has consistently failed to pursue Icke, although he did stop  the Twitter stories about him by making threats to sue  people (yet to happen as far as we know), and extracted hundreds of thousands of pounds from the BBC and ITV for not naming him as a paedophile.

Anyway, his old mate, Graham Ovenden (not really sure whether they are old mates, or that McAlpine just liked his style of work) has been found guilty of sex offences against children. What is it about these bearded artists, stick a paint brush in their hands and they think they have a licence to do what they like “it’s all about the art darling, now be a sweetie and drop your draws”.

So the jury at Truro crown court found Graham Ovenden, 70, guilty of four charges of indecency with a child, and two further charges of indecency and one of indecent assault. Makes you wonder what sort of person would collect work by a guy like that? Well, it might make you wonder, but it doesn’t make me wonder at all.

Here the link to the Guardian story. 

Link confirming McAlpines collection. 

LONDON BOOKSELLER Bloomsbury Book Auctions is today selling off Lord McAlpine’s former collection of photographs entitled A (Very) Private Collection: Fashion and Eroticism Photographs 1970-1990. For some reason the auctioneers coyly refer to “an historic collection… put together in London… by a well-known but anonymous collector”. Could their coyness have anything to do with the fact that the 344 pictures include 10 snaps of very young girls in very suggestive poses by Graham Ovenden?

“We were aware of the possible intentions in the context of this field but came to the decision that Graham Ovenden’s photos were in no way offensive,” says organiser John Cumming.

My source tells me the ” wellknown but anonymous collector” is former Conservative Party Treasurer Lord McAlpine, who in 1996 gave his photographic collection to an Australian gallery which in turn sold them on to Bloomsbury Book Auctions.

John Cumming is more circumspect: “We are selling a private collection.”

Evening Standard [London (UK)] 23 May 2003