We Do Not Have A Soul, Trust Me, I’m A Blogger.

pineal-gland-eye-of-horusIt seems unbelievable that it’s over three months since I last wrote for my own blog!! However, I have been a bit busy, what with keeping Alternative News Network online, which seems to take up more and more of my time. Not that the site itself needs much updating, as it’s all done automatically, but keeping the nasty hackers at bay, well that became almost a full time task.

As luck would have it, I’m fairly web savvy, but the “brute force” attacks were becoming a huge problem. Hundreds of IP’s trying to log on using the standard wp-admin method was  eating up far too much bandwidth. Anyone doing that now gets directed straight to the BBC’s cBeebies home page. I love ironic humour!.

So, what’s been going on out there during the last three months? Well, it seems to me that 2014 is fast becoming the year when the tide starts to turn. We’ve got bankers apparently killing themselves left right and centre, stories about Clintons friendship with convicted paeodiphiles appearing in the MSM, the alternative media is growing stronger by the day, with Youtube taking down whole channels with no warning. When that sort of censorship starts happening so publicly you know they are getting very worried.

One of the best good news stories of the year so far for me was CNN kicking Piers Morgan in the gonads. Laugh, I nearly wet myself. Look in the Mirror Piers, the Mirror never lies. Maybe he should take up a hobby, like keeping chickens. It’s really easy, and if they go missing during the day, they always “come home to roost”.

Madeleine McCann is still missing, as is flight MH370. No connection there at all, I just can’t get to the bottom of either story apart from knowing that the truth is being kept from us.

I think the main thing that has changed for me this year is a re-awakening of my more spiritual side. We get so bogged down in the cut and thrust of daily life that it’s very easy to loose focus on who you really are.

The biggest revelation in my re-awakening is that we do not have a soul. Man has for thousands of years pondered the question of whether we have a soul or not, or indeed if we have, exactly where the soul is! What a complete waste of time, we don’t have one.

If that is upsetting, don’t worry about it, you see, we’ve got it all back to front. We do not have a soul, because we are the soul. I am not the physical thing sitting here writing this stuff on my favourite eight year old net book, (which I built myself last year out of four scrap machines. Don’t ask, it’s a hobby of mine) The real me is the eternal being, soul, life force, call it what you will, which is using this physical body to interact in this illusion we call reality. So that’s it, I am not a flesh and blood body with a soul, I am a soul with a flesh and blood body. (Please don’t respond with remarks about being an R-SOUL, I’ve already heard them all)

The point I’m really trying to make here is that we focus so heavily on the physical, we forget that the physical is a temporary coat which we will all have to take off at some point. We all chose to come here, lets focus on why we are here, and get on with it.

I was talking to my daughter the other day, who at nineteen is much more awake and aware of the real nature of reality then I ever could be, about the “All seeing Eye” symbol. I happened to mention that the symbol happens to look very much like a diagram of the Pineal gland, or third eye. She looked at me like young people do when they can’t believe what they are hearing and said, “yes, that’s the point, why do you think they’ve been spending the last few thousand years doing everything they can to make us blind and stop it working!”  She had a good point so  I did a bit of research. It seems that this little bit of the brain has been deliberately suppressed to keep us slaves to the system. Dam! It may just be that the key to lifting the veil is as simple as kick starting everyone’s Pineal gland. I’ll let you know when I’ve got mine going. This link my be interesting.

Samuel William Has A Syrian Conspiracy Theory

Sam Conspiracy Theories

Breaking News! Video Blogger Samuel William has a conspiracy theory.

If you haven’t seen swilliamism  on YouTube, you really need to start following him. His feeds are carried on our main site, Alternative-News-Network.net. He has his own unique take on world events, and is becoming a major force in the fight for truth.

Great work Samuel, we love what you are doing.

List Of Participants Bilderberg 2013

the biggest secret

So the Bilderberg website is listing this years lucky attendees. Not bad for a meeting that officially didn’t exist a few years back.

Good to see Ken Clarke and Peter Mandelson there as usual, along with George Osbourne and Ed Balls (I thought they were on different sides). Queen, sorry, Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands, and of course dear old Henry Kissinger still going strong. A sprinkling of big pharma, and bankers, including of course, Evans, J. Michael from Goldman Sachs.

You don’t think they are planning something do you?

Current list of Participants

Status 3 June 2013

Chairman

FRA Castries, Henri de Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
DEU Achleitner, Paul M. Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
GBR Agius, Marcus Former Chairman, Barclays plc
GBR Alexander, Helen Chairman, UBM plc
USA Altman, Roger C. Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners
FIN Apunen, Matti Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
USA Athey, Susan Professor of Economics, Stanford Graduate School of Business
TUR Aydıntaşbaş, Aslı Columnist, Milliyet Newspaper
TUR Babacan, Ali Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs
GBR Balls, Edward M. Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
PRT Balsemão, Francisco Pinto Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA
FRA Barré, Nicolas Managing Editor, Les Echos
INT Barroso, José M. Durão President, European Commission
FRA Baverez, Nicolas Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
FRA Bavinchove, Olivier de Commander, Eurocorps
GBR Bell, John Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford
ITA Bernabè, Franco Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
USA Bezos, Jeff Founder and CEO, Amazon.com
SWE Bildt, Carl Minister for Foreign Affairs
SWE Borg, Anders Minister for Finance
NLD Boxmeer, Jean François van Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO, Heineken N.V.
NOR Brandtzæg, Svein Richard President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
GBR Carrington, Peter Former Honorary Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
ESP Cebrián, Juan Luis Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
CAN Clark, W. Edmund President and CEO, TD Bank Group
GBR Clarke, Kenneth Member of Parliament
DNK Corydon, Bjarne Minister of Finance
GBR Cowper-Coles, Sherard Business Development Director, International, BAE Systems plc
ITA Cucchiani, Enrico Tommaso CEO, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
BEL Davignon, Etienne Minister of State; Former Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
GBR Davis, Ian Senior Partner Emeritus, McKinsey & Company
NLD Dijkgraaf, Robbert H. Director and Leon Levy Professor, Institute for Advanced Study
TUR Dinçer, Haluk President, Retail and Insurance Group, Sabancı Holding A.S.
GBR Dudley, Robert Group Chief Executive, BP plc
USA Eberstadt, Nicholas N. Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise Institute
NOR Eide, Espen Barth Minister of Foreign Affairs
SWE Ekholm, Börje President and CEO, Investor AB
DEU Enders, Thomas CEO, EADS
USA Evans, J. Michael Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs & Co.
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA Feldstein, Martin S. Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBER
FRA Fillon, François Former Prime Minister
USA Fishman, Mark C. President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
GBR Flint, Douglas J. Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
IRL Gallagher, Paul Senior Counsel
USA Geithner, Timothy F. Former Secretary of the Treasury
USA Gfoeller, Michael Political Consultant
USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
DEU Grillo, Ulrich CEO, Grillo-Werke AG
ITA Gruber, Lilli Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
ESP Guindos, Luis de Minister of Economy and Competitiveness
GBR Gulliver, Stuart  Group Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings plc
CHE Gutzwiller, Felix Member of the Swiss Council of States
NLD Halberstadt, Victor Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary  General of Bilderberg Meetings
FIN Heinonen, Olli Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
GBR Henry, Simon CFO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
FRA Hermelin, Paul Chairman and CEO, Capgemini Group
ESP Isla, Pablo Chairman and CEO, Inditex Group
USA Jacobs, Kenneth M. Chairman and CEO, Lazard
USA Johnson, James A. Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
CHE Jordan, Thomas J. Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National Bank
USA Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
USA Kaplan, Robert D. Chief Geopolitical Analyst, Stratfor
USA Karp, Alex Founder and CEO, Palantir Technologies
GBR Kerr, John Independent Member, House of Lords
USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
NLD Knot, Klaas H.W. President, De Nederlandsche Bank
TUR Koç, Mustafa V. Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
DEU Koch, Roland CEO, Bilfinger SE
USA Kravis, Henry R. Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Josée Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
CHE Kudelski, André Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
GRC Kyriacopoulos, Ulysses Chairman, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A.
INT Lagarde, Christine Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
DEU Lauk, Kurt J. Chairman of the Economic Council to the CDU, Berlin
USA Lessig, Lawrence Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School; Director, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University
BEL Leysen, Thomas Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
DEU Lindner, Christian Party Leader, Free Democratic Party (FDP NRW)
SWE Löfven, Stefan Party Leader, Social Democratic Party (SAP)
DEU Löscher, Peter President and CEO, Siemens AG
GBR Mandelson, Peter Chairman, Global Counsel; Chairman, Lazard International 
USA Mathews, Jessica T. President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
CAN McKenna, Frank Chair, Brookfield Asset Management
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
FRA Montbrial, Thierry de President, French Institute for International Relations
ITA Monti, Mario Former Prime Minister
USA Mundie, Craig J. Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation
ITA Nagel, Alberto CEO, Mediobanca
NLD Netherlands, H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of The
USA Ng, Andrew Y. Co-Founder, Coursera
FIN Ollila, Jorma Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
GBR Omand, David Visiting Professor, King’s College London
GBR Osborne, George Chancellor of the Exchequer
USA Ottolenghi, Emanuele Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
TUR Özel, Soli Senior Lecturer, Kadir Has University; Columnist, Habertürk Newspaper
GRC Papahelas, Alexis Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper
TUR Pavey, Şafak Member of Parliament (CHP)
FRA Pécresse, Valérie Member of Parliament (UMP)
USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
USA Petraeus, David H. General, U.S. Army (Retired)
PRT Portas, Paulo Minister of State and Foreign Affairs
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. Chair, Torys LLP
INT Reding, Viviane Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European Commission
CAN Reisman, Heather M. CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
FRA Rey, Hélène Professor of Economics, London Business School
GBR Robertson, Simon Partner, Robertson Robey Associates LLP; Deputy Chairman, HSBC Holdings
ITA Rocca, Gianfelice Chairman,Techint Group
POL Rostowski, Jacek Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister
USA Rubin, Robert E. Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
NLD Rutte, Mark Prime Minister
AUT Schieder, Andreas State Secretary of Finance
USA Schmidt, Eric E. Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
AUT Scholten, Rudolf Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
PRT Seguro, António José Secretary General, Socialist Party
FRA Senard, Jean-Dominique CEO, Michelin Group
NOR Skogen Lund, Kristin Director General, Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise
USA Slaughter, Anne-Marie Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University
IRL Sutherland, Peter D. Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
GBR Taylor, Martin Former Chairman, Syngenta AG
INT Thiam, Tidjane Group CEO, Prudential plc
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Thiel Capital
USA Thompson, Craig B. President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
DNK Topsøe, Jakob Haldor Partner, AMBROX Capital A/S
FIN Urpilainen, Jutta Minister of Finance
CHE Vasella, Daniel L. Honorary Chairman, Novartis AG
GBR Voser, Peter R. CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
CAN Wall, Brad Premier of Saskatchewan
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob Chairman, Investor AB
USA Warsh, Kevin Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
CAN Weston, Galen G. Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited
GBR Williams of Crosby, Shirley Member, House of Lords
GBR Wolf, Martin H. Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Wolfensohn, James D. Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
GBR Wright, David Vice Chairman, Barclays plc
INT Zoellick, Robert B. Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

Bilderberg 2013 To Be Held In Watford UK

So the 2013 Bilderberg meeting is taking place in the Grove Hotel in Watford, UK from the 6th-9th June 2013. I wonder if the the main stream media will be giving it the full coverage it deserves, after all, some of the most “so called” influential people in the world will be gathering to plan your future for you.

The answer of course is, no they won’t, and never have since 1954. But we will. We will be covering every detail we can find out about this clandestine meeting.

Here’s the challenge. I am calling on everyone in the alternative media to cram Google with Bilderberg 2013 articles. They can no longer pretend the meeting don’t exist, so let’s not only all join together to expose them for what they are, but expose exactly who is attending.

I will be honest,Twitter leaves me cold, and i don’t really understand how it works, but  how about making it trend over there? #Bilderberg 2013 should be enough!!

Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead. Media Control?

Margaret-Thatcher-Oz-620-1819610Yes, I was around in the hay days of Radio 1 banning records, Je t’aime, Wet Dream, Frankie Goes To Hollywood, but to ban a song from the children’s classic The Wizard Of Oz, whatever is the world coming too?

There are many levels to this story. On the surface there is the respect for the grieving family aspect. This I really don’t get. Carol “I’m A Celebrity”, and Sir Mark “Sat Nav” Thatcher, twins to Dennis and Margaret surly have got used to the very divided feelings their mother created. They are also fairly thick-skinned people. After all, wasn’t it Carol who famously referred to Jo Wilfred Tsonga as a half “Gollywog”, and then refused to apologise saying  “I stand by what I said. I wasn’t going to apologise. I never meant it in a racist way. It was shorthand. I described someone’s appearance colloquially—someone I happen to greatly admire”. Yea right. And of course Mark was involved in the attempted coup in Equatorial New Guinea, for which he was fined £313,000 with a four-year suspended jail sentence.


But looking closer, it is interesting also that Capital Radio who run the rival chart show for the Heart Network took the same stance. Heart and Capital are of course owned by Global Radio, the biggest commercial network in the UK. They also own LBC 97.3, the UK’s first Independent Local Radio station. How sad that across the country all of these tiny independent local stations have gone forever. Swallowed up by the controlling few.

My point here is that the globalists have total control over the media. Therefore, the public decides that it wants a song at number 2 in the download charts, and the globalists say, “don’t care what you slaves say, we control you, and we’re not playing it”.

The real truth is more likely to be that these elite control freaks don’t want a song from the very film that parodies their control system, being linked to one of the most effective puppets they had the pleasure of controlling. Maybe just too many people are waking up to the reality of what is really going on. You may say I’m a dreamer, bit I’m not the only one.

Imagine there’s no heaven
It’s easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people living for today

Imagine there’s no countries
It isn’t hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people living life in peace

You, you may say
I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one
I hope some day you’ll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people sharing all the world

You, you may say
I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one
I hope some day you’ll join us
And the world will live as one

President Kennedy, the Federal Reserve and Executive Order 11110

President Kennedy, the Federal Reserve and Executive Order 11110

by Cedric X

On June 4, 1963, a little known attempt was made to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve.

“The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American’s freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of this plight.” — President John Fitzgerald Kennedy – In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his assassination!

From The Final Call, Vol15, No.6, on January 17, 1996 (USA)

President Kennedy’s order gave the Treasury the power “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury.” This meant that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury’s vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes into circulation. The ramifications of this bill are enormous.

With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificates were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything.

Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the government the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.

The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.

— President John F. Kennedy – Address to newspaper publishers – April 27, 1961

Quotes On The New World Order

After Mr. Kennedy was assassinated just five months later, no more silver certificates were issued. The Final Call has learned that the Executive Order was never repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid. Why then has no president utilized it? Virtually all of the nearly $6 trillion in debt has been created since 1963, and if a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt would be nowhere near the current level. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to future presidents who would think to eliminate the U.S. debt by eliminating the Federal Reserve’s control over the creation of money.

Mr. Kennedy challenged the government of money by challenging the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt – war and the creation of money by a privately-owned central bank. His efforts to have all troops out of Vietnam by 1965 and Executive Order 11110 would have severely cut into the profits and control of the New York banking establishment. As America’s debt reaches unbearable levels and a conflict emerges in Bosnia that will further increase America’s debt, one is force to ask, will President Clinton have the courage to consider utilizing Executive Order 11110 and, if so, is he willing to pay the ultimate price for doing so?

Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289

AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-

By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):

(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption

and —

By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.

Of course, the fact that both JFK and Lincoln met the the same end is a mere coincidence.

Abraham Lincoln’s Monetary Policy, 1865 (Page 91 of Senate document 23.)

Money is the creature of law and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of national Government.

Money possesses no value to the State other than that given to it by circulation.

Capital has its proper place and is entitled to every protection. The wages of men should be recognised in the structure of and in the social order as more important than the wages of money.

No duty is more imperative for the Government than the duty it owes the People to furnish them with a sound and uniform currency, and of regulating the circulation of the medium of exchange so that labour will be protected from a vicious currency, and commerce will be facilitated by cheap and safe exchanges.

The available supply of Gold and Silver being wholly inadequate to permit the issuance of coins of intrinsic value or paper currency convertible into coin in the volume required to serve the needs of the People, some other basis for the issue of currency must be developed, and some means other than that of convertibility into coin must be developed to prevent undue fluctuation in the value of paper currency or any other substitute for money of intrinsic value that may come into use.

The monetary needs of increasing numbers of People advancing towards higher standards of living can and should be met by the Government. Such needs can be served by the issue of National Currency and Credit through the operation of a National Banking system .The circulation of a medium of exchange issued and backed by the Government can be properly regulated and redundancy of issue avoided by withdrawing from circulation such amounts as may be necessary by Taxation, Redeposit, and otherwise. Government has the power to regulate the currency and creditof the Nation.

Government should stand behind its currency and credit and the Bank deposits of the Nation. No individual should suffer a loss of money through depreciation or inflated currency or Bank bankruptcy.

Government possessing the power to create and issue currency and credits money and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by Taxation and otherwise need not and should not borrow capital at interest as a means of financing Governmental work and public enterprise. The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of the consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Governments greatest creative opportunity.

By the adoption of these principles the long felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprise, the maintenance of stable Government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own Government. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power.

Some information on the Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve, a Private Corporation One of the most common concerns among people who engage in any effort to reduce their taxes is, “Will keeping my money hurt the government’s ability to pay it’s bills?” As explained in the first article in this series, the modern withholding tax does not, and wasn’t designed to, pay for government services. What it does do, is pay for the privately-owned Federal Reserve System.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines the “Federal Reserve System” as, “Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves.”

Privately-owned banks own the stock of the Fed. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said:

Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank’s nine member board of directors.

Similarly, the Federal Reserve Banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks. Taking another look at Black’s Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:

Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.).

The FED banks, which are privately owned, actually issue, that is, create, the money we use. In 1964 the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is:

The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine.  It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving to print them.

As we all know, anyone who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is what the Fed is.

No man did more to expose the power of the Fed than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. Constantly pointing out that monetary issues shouldn’t be partisan, he criticized both the Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt administrations. In describing the Fed, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932, that:

Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

Some people think the Federal reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man’s throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain an international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and of wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.

The Fed basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the Fed banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it’s interesting to note that the Federal Reserve act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the Fed over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, both in the past and in the present, that speak out against it. One of these men was President John F. Kennedy. His efforts were detailed in Jim Marrs’ 1990 book, Crossfire:

Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy’s attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.

Kennedy’s comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks.

A number of “Kennedy bills” were indeed issued – the author has a five dollar bill in his possession with the heading “United States Note” – but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy’s death. According to information from the Library of the Comptroller of the Currency, Executive Order 11,110 remains in effect today, although successive administrations beginning with that of President Lyndon Johnson apparently have simply ignored it and instead returned to the practice of paying interest on Federal Reserve notes. Today we continue to use Federal Reserve Notes, and the deficit is at an all-time high.

The point being made is that the IRS taxes you pay aren’t used for government services. It won’t hurt you, or the nation, to legally reduce or eliminate your tax liability.

Source 

Who Owns The Bank Of England

I have absolutely no guilt re-blogging someone else’s work if the content is important. This was published in the Tap Blog in February and needs as much exposure as possible.

Thanks Tap, keep up the good work.

Who Owns The Bank Of England?

“The essence of the contemporary monetary system is creation of money,out of nothing, by private banks”Martin Wolf,Financial Times,9th November 2010. quoted by http://www.positivemoney.org.ukLATEST UPDATE – banks directors named

You ask the question, Who Owns The Bank Of England? to one thousand Britons, and I kid you not, all of them will say that it is owned by the Government.

They would be wrong.

The Bank Of England was originally a private bank, which contracted to lend money to the British Government in a financial crisis. It was privately owned at its foundation and remained so until the post-war Labour government nationalised it in 1946.

So it is owned by the government?

No.

Here is how Wikipedia explains it.

 

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called Bank of England Nominees Limited, (BOEN), a private limited company, with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. According to its Memorandum & Articles of Association, its objectives are:- “To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

Bank of England Nominees Limited was granted an exemption by Edmund Dell, Secretary of State for Trade, from the disclosure requirements under Section 27(9) of the Companies Act 1976 , because, “it was considered undesirable that the disclosure requirements should apply to certain categories of shareholders.” The Bank of England is also protected by its Royal Charter status, and the Official Secrets Act.

In other words, you and I are not allowed to know who the shareholders are who own the company which carries out Central Banking in the UK. Some people say that Mandelson’s buddies, the Rothschilds are major shareholders. Also the Queen. But the information is secret. We are not allowed to know.

But what would surprise everybody is that the Bank Of England, which is entitled to issue cash, then lend it and charge interest to the government, is still essentially a private business.

What would also surprise people is so is the Federal Reserve of America a privately owned bank, and all central banks of the world, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland, which is the Central Banks’ clearing house.

(For a history of central banking – http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2010/12/remember-1920s-easy-loans-big-debts.html)

If the One World Government actually had an address, this would be part of it – the B.I.S, another privately owned bank, the central bankers’ central bank, beyond the control of democracy or government, able to influence events secretly from behind the scenes. One thing is for sure is that in times of financial crisis, these central banking networks become supremely powerful, as those like Gordon Brown allow their countries to become effectively indebted to the point of loss of control.

The people wielding this power see the world’s financial crisis as their moment of opportunity to seize greater power. The scary part of that is that hardly a living soul even knows they exist. Now that’s real power.

What’s all this about?

Professor Carroll Quigley wrote a book on who ruled the the USA and Britain between 1870 and 1960, called Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.  His publisher MacMillan, was taken over as they first published his book, and the plates and the manuscript were destroyed.  But not before a handful of them had been sold.  In this book, Professor Quigley wrote  –

The power of the Bank Of England and of its governor was admitted by most qualified observers.  In January 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been Chancellor Of The Exchequer in 1915-1916, as Chairman of the Board of The Midland Bank, told its stockholder:”I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow in their hands the destiny of the people.”

 

 

Quigley also wrote –

..the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”

 

 

Another book continues the story, Secret Records Revealed  by Dr Dennis Cuddy –

On August 5th 1995, the New York Times published an article by Keith Bradsher, in which he wrote –

In a small Swiss city sits an international organisation so obscure and secretive…Control of the institution, the Bank for International Settlements, lies with some of the world’s most powerful and least visible men: the heads of thirty-two central banks, officials able to shift billions of dollars at the stroke of a pen.”

 

 

On June 28th 1998, The Washington Post published an article about the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) titled, “At Secret Meetings in Switzerland, 13 people shape the world’s economy”, which described these individuals as “this economic cabal…this secretive group…the financial barons who control the world’s supply of money.”

 

 

Quigley again –

Each Central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

 

 

They are not all Jewish by the way.

Dr Stan Monteith in The Brotherhood Of Darkness (Anomolos) writes –

Anti-Semitism is a smokescreen created to conceal the identity of the true enemy.

 

 

He explains that the objective of the secretive groups is to bring about the surrender of sovereignty and of national independence.

THE BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

The Bank of England has played a prominent role in American history — without it, the United States would not exist.

The American colonists considered themselves loyal Englishmen to a man, but when they began to enjoy unequalled prosperity by printing and circulating their own Colonial scrip, the stockholders of the Bank of England went to George III and informed him that their monopoly of interest-bearing notes in the colonies was at stake. He banned the scrip, with the result that there was an immediate depression in the commercial life of the Americas. This was the cause of the Rebellion; as Benjamin Franklin pointed out, the little tax on tea, amounting to about a dollar a year per American family, could have been borne, but the colonists could not survive the banning of their own money.

Early descriptions of the shareholders of the Bank of England identify them as “a Society of about 1300 persons”. They included the King and Queen of England, who received shares to the value of 10,000 pounds each; Marlborough, who invested 10,000 pounds — he also invested large sums from his “commissions” in the East India Co. in 1697, and later became Governor of the Hudson Bay Company, which paid a 75% dividend; Lord Shrewsbury, who invested 10,000 pounds; Godolphin, who invested 7000 pounds — he predicted that the Bank of England would not only finance trade, but would carry the burden of her wars, which was proven true in the next three hundred years. Virginia Cowles writes, in “The Great Marlborough”: “England emerged from the war as the dominant force, because the Bank of England’s credit system enabled her to bear the burden of war without undue strain.”

WASP

FACTS ABOUT BANK OF ENGLAND

EXTRACT –

The Bank of England and the Rothschilds continued to play a dominant role in the commercial life of the United States, causing panics and depressions for the Rothschilds whenever their officials were instructed to do so. When the Second Bank of the United States expired in 1836, and President Jackson refused to renew it, [thus] creating great prosperity in the United States when government funds were deposited in other banks, the Rothschilds punished the upstarts by causing the Panic of 1837. As Henry Clews writes in “Twenty-Eight Years on Wall Street”, p. 157: “The Panic of 1837 was aggravated by the Bank of England when it in one day threw out all the paper connected with the United States.”

By refusing to credit American notes and stocks, the Bank of England created financial panic among the holders of that paper. The panic enabled Rothschild’s agents, Peabody and Belmont, to reap a fortune in buying up depreciated stocks during the panic.

The Bank of England has played a prominent role in wars, revolutions, and espionage, as well as business panics. When Napoleon escaped from Elba in 1815, the London gold market jumped overnight from 4lb.6d to 5lb.7d. The leading buyer was Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who was under orders from the British Treasury to dispatch gold to the Duke of Wellington, grouping to stop Napoleon. After Waterloo, the price of gold dropped.

During the twentieth century, the most important name at the Bank of England was Lord Montagu Norman. His grandfather, George Warde Norman, had been governor of the Bank of England from 1821-1872, longer than any other man; his other grandfather, Lord Collet, was Governor of the Bank of England from 1887-89, and managing partner of Brown Shipley Co. in London for twenty-five years.

In 1894, Montague Norman was sent to New York to work in the offices of Brown Brothers; he was befriended by the W.A. Delano family, and lived with the Markoe family, partners of Brown Bros. In 1907, Norman was elected to the Court of the Bank of England. In 1912, he had a severe nervous breakdown, and was treated by [Carl] Jung in Switzerland. He became deputy governor of the Bank of England in 1916, and later served until 1944 as Governor. The Wall Street Journal wrote of him in 1927:

“Mr. M. Collet Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England, is now head and shoulders above all other British bankers. No other British banker has ever been as independent and supreme in the world of British finance as Mr. Norman is today. He has just been elected Governor for the eighth year in succession. Before the war, no Governor was allowed to hold office for more than two years; but Mr. Norman has broken all precedents. He runs his Bank and his Treasury as well. He appears to have no associations except his employees. He gives no interviews. He leaves the British financial world wholly in the thick as to his plans and ideas.”

above from WASP
EARLY DAY MOTION from AUSTEN MITCHELL

Early day motion 1297

Print version

ENFORCEMENT OF BANK OF ENGLAND ACT 1694

Session: 2008-09

Date tabled: 20.04.2009

Primary sponsor: Mitchell, Austin

Sponsors: Cohen, Harry Cryer, Ann Illsley, Eric McDonnell, John Taylor, David

That this House, observing that the intention of the founding Act of the Bank of England in 1694 was `that their Majesties’ subjects may not be oppressed by the said corporation’, notes that those subjects have been seriously oppressed by the Bank’s failure to control the greed, risk-taking and speculation of the banking system over which it presides; and therefore suggests that this oppression should be dealt with as the Act provides by fines three times the value of the abusive trading.

ENDS

As a hundred years have gone by now, with the move to One World Government, which were started in earnest a century ago, reaching the advanced stage, the confusion from hereon can only get much much worse.  The best thing the One World Government, which does already exist, could do, is start telling the world who they are, how they got to where they are, and what they intend to do.  Only then will the growing chaos of secretive groups running the world out of sight start to unravel.  There are of course, many ugly secrets to be told, and some of those secrets might well be to do with this man.  Why doesn’t Prince Charles tell us more of what he knows?

And what is his brother Andrew up to in Khazakstan?
WASP writes –

The book I referred you to THE WORLD ORDER by Eustace Mullins, is very informative, but many of your viewers might prefer to look at a video.

I found this You Tube Interview regarding this same book.

This will round off the subject, as the words come from ‘THE HORSES MOUTH’ so to speak.

Consider this w/r/t paying off debt

If $1/sec paid back taking a year as 365.25 days it would take to pay back $100,000 …… 31.5576 years

or $100,000,000 …31,557.6 years

& so on, but this is a better way of looking at it as per video.

I believe the USA Deficit is c.a.

$14.7 Trillion

YOUR NAME IS ON AN I.O.U FOR MORE THAN

14.7 TRILLION DOLLARS

A million seconds have elapsed in less than 12 days

A billion seconds took more than 35 years to tick away

A trillion seconds ago was bacck in the Stone Age,

in the year 29,607B.C.

The Voice Is A BBC Scripted Load Of Tosh. Don’t Buy Into Hype.

You’ve got to love the Mail. The countries on the brink of meltdown as we are deliberately being driven to the point of total desperation, and they lead on a story about Freddie Mercury’s former girlfriend.

After ignoring that story, my eyes scanned to a bit about Jessie J getting upset over Will.i.am. Under the headline ‘He never wants people to pick me’: Jessie J and Will.i.am come to blows as he tries to influence artist NOT to pick her on The Voice” Fay Strang expands on the spat between the two highly paid performers as if it’s real life!

Jessie jSorry to shatter the illusion, but it’s not real. It’s a controlled pre-recorded contrived load of old tosh to draw you in to watching for weeks on end, to achieve what? Where the hell is last seasons winner Leanne Mitchell? It really changed her life didn’t it.

Nothing you see on these shows is real. Simon Cowell stopping some kid half way through a song and getting him to sing another one, a glass of water being thrown, all of it is crafted to cause an emotional reason to keep watching. If you enjoy this stuff, good luck to you, but please don’t for one second think any of it is real.

I happen to think Jessie J is a very talented singer, Tom Jones of course is a legend, as for Will.i.am, I just love the Black Eyed Peas (Let’s get retarded), although I still have no idea who the other one is, and to be honest it doesn’t really matter, they are following a script, which dear old Tom looks like he has forgotten most of the time. Years ago I used to watch WWF  (now called WWE after the globalist backed WWF complained) and WCW, but I always knew it was fake.

Everything you watch on TV is controlled and designed to mesmerize you, from the news to Eastenders, please understand that simple truth.

If you want reality, focus on the pain you are suffering every time you go shopping or fill up the fuel tank. Start to study how the control system to slowly killing you and your loved ones with forced vaccinations, poison in the water, a health service designed to fill you full of drugs to profit  big pharma rather than teach you how to live a healthy lifestyle. Find out about the real corruption that controls our legal system, government, and police, and why the current paedophilia scandal will always be a white wash because the authorities in charge if investigating it are the very same people caught up in it. Do you really think all of this celebrity nonsense  including the Rolf Harris saga is the real story. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

The real truth is at the very top, the evil few who manipulate everything. Do you really think Ted Heath would have remained Prime minister if the truth about him had been exposed?  No one at that time had any idea he was an evil paedophile, abusing, and if the Icke information is correct, murdering little boys. He was given access to enjoy his grotesque lifestyle in order to be controlled, it’s how the system works.

As I always say, It’s your choice, I may be completely wrong, in fact sometimes I really hope I am, but unless things start to change soon, all will be lost, forever.

Paedophilia is not the problem, it’s just part of the problem.

illuminati2So, why have I not been active on here for a few days?  No biggie really, but just now and again you need to step away from the negative and recharge your batteries. Running a site like this can become very obsessive, and actually take over your life. I tend to blog late evenings, so no worries there, but I also have to earn money to live.

Apart from a full time job, I run other sites and online activity to help keep the wolf from the door. Alternative media, self-hosted sites like this one actually cost money to run, not even thinking about man hours. We could run it on WordPress .com for free, but self-hosting gives us total control and flexibility.

Yes, we do openly ask for donations, but that simply doesn’t happen often enough to cover the overheads. We have reluctantly put adsense back on the site, which helps a little, but the truth is, in order to maintain Piereport-news.com, Alternative News Network and Breaking the Machine, I need to spend time keeping the other stuff active.

I had considered closing PieReport-News (stupid name anyway) because Alternative News Network has taken off so well, bringing all of the good stuff together in one place, and needing very little maintenance, but keeping PieReport going does give me the freedom to kick off, and still receives good traffic.

Bottom line is that my reason for running PieReport-News is still very real. I understand much of what is going on and have taken the decision to step away from their system. Just by being aware gives you so much power. Understanding that it is all one big control game allows you to play by your own rules. If we can wake up just a few people to the real truth behind the global control system, then it’s all worth it.

I know the current topic is largely Paedophilia, and well done to everyone involved in yesterdays “#paedobritain” twitter storm, which was a brilliant success. To Madlands, you did a great job and must channel your energies in whichever way you feel best. But Paedophilia is not the main story, it is just part of a much bigger battle. We have spent a lot of time writing about it because it still has the potential to expose the evil controlling us, for what they really are.

What has to be exposed is the truth behind the matrix. Every part of our world is controlled by a few elite in the very darkest corners of reality. The TV we watch, the money we earn, food, media, entertainment, industry, health, religions, government, education, everything is under their control. Understand that simple truth and it all becomes clear. Whilst I live in the system, I am free of their control because I understand what the truth is. That’s all it takes, choosing to be free.

So we will continue, but as I always say, don’t just read this and expect others to fight for you, do something yourself to break this evil system.

Why Bill Gates Thinks I Must Be An Irresponsible Parent By Deliberately Putting My Daughters Health at Risk.

I saw this on the “Nutters” site today and it not only made me realise what a disgrace I am, but incensed me enough to break my enforced sabbatical from writing on Piereport. (I will explain later why I’ve been away for a few days, although it’s not a very exciting story)

Anyone who has bothered to read my “about me” page will understand why Ickes post has got my blood boiling again. Look at that image, what do you see? Mother and daughter lovingly looking into each others eyes? Well, it’s not what I see!

To me, this is globalist propaganda of the most disgusting and offensive kind. An innocent child trustingly  looking into her mother eyes, while she has a sort of evil demonic grin knowing that she is about  subject her child to a potential death sentence.

Yes I know that’s a bit over the top, but how many parents who allow the the control system to pump dangerous chemicals into their kids have bothered to do any research?

For god’s sake people, the human body is a wonderful self preservation capsule. It is designed to survive in this low frequency world in conditions far worse than most people live today. With half decent nutrition  it can survive very well without  the need for designer globalist sponsored shit designed to slow kill, being pumped into us.

Our daughter was one of the first to be “offered” the vaccine some years ago. When I say offered, it was an opt out, not opt in, so the assumption was that all girls would have it. Shock horror, you would have thought we were the family from hell when we refused to sign the consent form. Our daughter was one of only two in the whole year who didn’t have the vaccine. “Don’t you want to protect your daughter from the risk of cervical cancer” was one of the questions we were asked. I won’t give you my full response, but it included a bit about “at 14, it may surprise you to find out that she isn’t sexually active, even though you have done you best to educate her into being so”.

At this time I had no real idea how dangerous cervarix or gardasil are, but every instinctive parental alarm bell was rang.

Look, if you feel giving you child this stuff is the right thing to do, that’s your choice, but please at least do the research first, and make sure it’s is unbiased research, because the evil global pharma machine have flooded the main stream media with the worst kind of manipulating bollocks.

This post is dedicated to Christina Richelle Tarsell who died age 21 just days after having a Gardasil vaccination. Read her story here.

 

The evil who are controlling us are waging war on our brilliant immune system, you have the power to stop them!

 

 

Cameron’s Leveson deal is ‘threat to press freedom’, says human rights watchdog. And news blogs as well!

So the globalist soap opera rolls on. It appears that the whole Leveson phone hacking scandal was a means to an end.

What happens when you corner a rat? The rat attacks, and that is exactly what these rats are doing. They know that they’ve been rumbled. They are fully aware that people are waking up and exposing them for what they really are, political actors playing out a script written for them by the globalist masters, under the illusion of democracy.

People are starting to realise that all, and by that I mean all political parties are controlled by the elite. They play out the roles of government and opposition to reinforce the illusion of freedom, only to do as they are told when in power. Blair, a JPMorgan Chase man through and through, and still paid millions by them, plus earnings from Goldman Sachs, laid the foundations of the UK collapse under the guise of “New Labour”.

They are aware that some good journalists, yes there are still some, want to expose the truth. The rise of Alternative media sites, telling it how it really is, is a real threat to them, so they create a reason, planned over many years, to install controls on the media.

The hope that newspapers will refuse to sign up to this new charter is a false hope, as the newspapers are broadly owned by the same people who control the rest of the media.

This is a real threat and attack on freedom of speech on blogs like this. Here is a screen grab of the

interpretation

interpretations of the charter. Section 1,b(ii) clearly states news related websites!!

So the heat is being turned up. What’s that expression about “can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”; well, I love cooking, sorry.

Here’s the article from the Telegraph.

David Cameron has been accused of creating a “threat to press freedom” by an international body which polices human rights in some of the most autocratic countries.

By Christopher Hope, and Rowena Mason7:20PM GMT 18 Mar 2013

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, which usually polices elections to ensure against human rights abuses, said that the phone hacking scandal should not be used as an “excuse” to restrict free speech.
The intervention was made after the Prime Minister was accused of putting together a “grubby deal” after he dropped his opposition to use legislation to underpin a new system of press regulation.
The Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders met with a Conservative minister in secret talks which lasted until early Monday morning to hammer out a deal which could see the press regulated by a new Royal Charter.
Those who refuse to sign up, including websites, now face “exemplary damages” if they are taken to court.
Several of the country’s biggest newspaper groups, including Telegraph Media Group, issued a statement expressing their initial concerns over the proposals.

There is growing speculation that some newspapers and magazines may boycott the new system amid claims it violates fundamental human rights. Mr Cameron unveiled the plans in Parliament as several MPs – exposed for their own failings in the media – welcomed the crackdown. In a statement, a spokesman for the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe said: “A government-established regulatory body, regardless of how independent it is intended to be, could pose a threat to media freedom. “I still believe that self-regulation is the best way to deal with ethical lapses and failures to comply with professional standards. “The phone-hacking scandal was a criminal issue and the people involved are being prosecuted. This should not be used as an excuse to rein in all print media.” The Index on Censorship, a campaign group chaired by veteran BBC broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, said creation of Britain’s first official newspaper regulator for 300 years marks a “sad day for press freedom”. Mr Dimbleby said he is “dismayed” that politicians will now get power over the regulation of newspapers. The board has the gravest anxiety at the residual political powers the now expected outcome and system will give to politicians,” Mr Dimbleby said. “The two thirds block on any changes to the royal charter could be abused in the future – not least when today’s emerging consensus shows that the parties can come together in both houses to agree on press regulation.” In the Commons, Mr Cameron sought to draw a line under the phone hacking scandal which started with the claim that the mobile phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler was hacked by reporters and led to scores of journalists being arrested and a full blown judicial inquiry by Lord Justice Leveson. Insisting that the cross-party deal on press regulation would defend the principle of a free press, Mr Cameron told MPs: “My message to the press is clear. We’ve had the debate. Now it is time to get on and make this system work.” He defended the need to enshrine the royal charter in law, which could be amended by peers and MPs at a later date, insisting: “It is legislation to protect the royal charter, it is not legislation to recognise the royal charter. Setting out his reasons for opposing more fundamental legislation, he said it would be “wrong to run even the slightest risk of infringing free speech or a free press”. He added: “As Winston Churchill said, ‘a free press is the unsleeping guardian of every other right that free men prize, it is the most dangerous foe of tyranny’. By rejecting statutory regulation but being in favour of a royal charter this House has defended that principle.” The royal charter will be submitted to the Queen for approval in May, once the necessary legislation has been approved by MPs and peers. Read the draft royal charter in full:

 

//
Read More

JP Morgan Chase. All Accounts show Zero balance 19 March 2013

jp-morgan-chase-logoDo you remember the times when you got paid weekly, with real cash in a brown pay packet? Yes I know, Wagon Wheels were bigger and the summers longer, but a story on

Sherrie Questioning All caught my eye this morning. It appears that Twitter was buzzing with people reporting their accounts with JP Morgan Chase where showing zero.

Whether this was a computer glitch or something more sinister doesn’t really matter, it’s a great example that these giant globalist Rothschilds controlled bastards have total power to steal your money at any time. How many times does this have to be repeated? Money does not exist, your bank does not have a little vault with your cash in it. Your bank balance is nothing more than numbers on a computer screen. Banks do not have keep your money, they just play with figures, and have the power to remove the figures at any time.

Cyprus is just a little trial to see how far they can push people. Fractional Reserve Lending is the biggest sin of the banking world. I give them £10 to look after, they lend out £100. The £90.00 difference has been made up out of thin air. They get paid interest on an imaginary £90.00, and demand it back, when it didn’t exist in the first place. These people are corrupt thieves. Wake up people.

If this confuses you, please do some research, your saving are not 100% safe.

Comic Relief, Saint Sinner or Just Another Big Globalist Con.

funraisers-post-rndI don’t usually write a post with 100% lack of research, sometimes you just have to do things by gut instinct.

To be honest, I’ve been mulling this topic over for a few weeks now, ever since the Comic Relief promos have been forced down our throats, so here we go, and lets see where this takes us.

Comic Relief, and for that matter, Children in Need make us all feel nice and comfy, satisfied that we are doing our bit to save the world, pledge a few quid, stick yet another red nose on, and we’re good to go, all set up to bury our heads in the sand to the real truths happening all around us.

You see, my problem with anything like this, especially when the corrupt, discredited BBC are involved is that it’s all smoke and mirrors, one big con to make us think we are doing something positive, while being shafted from behind. I have, by the way, the same feelings about WWF, Save The Children, Oxfam and any other organised charity, including and especially Cancer Research. And it is genuinely not about being tight fisted, if someone needs help, I’m there at the front of the queue, it’s because it’s all one big con, designed to satisfy our instincts, while distracting us from whats really happening.

So let’s look at Comic Relief. A bunch of do gooding celebrities making wonderful sacrifices to feed a child in Africa. No, a bunch of self seeking no marks, spending tax payers money to look good and satisfy their already over inflated ego’s. Look at me everyone, I really care by patronising some poor little starving kid on the other side of the world. Bit harsh you may so, to which I reply, no it isn’t. The child in Africa should not be starving in the first place. The Royal family in general, and Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in particular has enough personal wealth to solve this problem over night. Personal wealth that we are not allowed to know about.

Anyway, back to Comic Relief. Len, we love you, you are probably the most famous non funny comedian in the history of entertainment (Katanga my friends). I know you’ve been there for 25 years, along with Richard Curtis, Bonio and Stig (is that right?), and you’ve raised an astronomical amount of money, but at what cost? How much licence payers money is spent by the corrupt, discredited BBC to stage this out of season pantomime? BBC radio and TV is taken over for a month selling the idea, eager celebrities  who lead a very charmed life anyway, jet off across the globe to snivel all over some poor starving black kid with man made HIV, culminating in the biggest BBC TV network channel being given over to this charade for a whole evening. Can anyone please tell me the exact cost because I’m dammed if I can find out what it is.

But here is the real sucker punch to me, the television enforced tax which is a CRIMINAL offence not to pay, is used to run the gig, forcing, through emotional blackmail jessie-j-hair-2and hypnotic propaganda, honest men, women and children, who are living through the worst depression in living memory, (deliberately brought about by corrupt collusion between the banking masters and the Blair globalist agenda “New Labour” government,)  to dig deep into their already empty pockets to find yet more money to line the greedy pockets of the Globalist run charities.

It only costs £5.00 to cure one of these children by filling them full of poisonous vaccines. I bet Bill Gates is almost having an orgasm at the very thought.

Yes, people and children are starving all across the world. They are supposed to be, it’s all part of the plan, don’t you see that? One vile family could solve the problem straight away, but they won’t, because they are part of the controlling elite who create this appalling situation. No matter how much money you give, it will never be enough, because it’s not supposed to be solved. Until humanity wakes up to the truth that we are controlled pawns in a real life reality show, manipulated by a few interbred families who run absolutely everything, this will continue. The only real difference at the moment is that very soon, if not already,  it will be you and your family starving, and not just the black kids in Africa.

We are heading for total collapse and the 9.5 million people who tuned into Comic Relief last night have no idea.

I’m doing my bit to change things, for god sake wake up and do something as well. Once lit, the fire will be impossible to extinguish. They may control everything, but they are surprisingly few in numbers, turn the pyramid upside down, the base weighs millions of times more than the tip.

 

Facebook ‘likes’ reveal personal details of users. Talk about stating the bleeding obvious.

facebookI notice in the FT and Express today a report that Facebook reveals more than people realise about their personal details. Read More

Of course it does, it was designed that way.

Facebook is nothing more than an information harvesting site, designed to lure users to subliminally reveal their most personal intimate details, and as usual, with it’s addictive nature, we’ve all fallen for it. YouTube is exactly the same, as indeed are Google +.

You are being watched, accessed and sorted by these global spying machines. Isn’t it clever how advertising on these sites fits exactly into your interest groups?

So why are we on Facebook then. Well to be honest, I rarely even look at it, and don’t ever expect me to respond to tweets either. We set up twitter and facebook accounts to share content from the site, it’s all done by auto posting. I’ve done the same with Tumblr and blogger, but will never post anything directly personal to me. Paranoid, too right I am. The internet is a great tool, use it, but don’t be controlled by it. Don’t even start me on smart phones.

The Unlawful Killing of Princess Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed

Posted at the request of The Rebel.org

unlawfulkilling

A call to arms to all anti-NWO activist: Resist royal cyber-bullying with all available means

Three days ago, the Rebel Site got taken offline by its hosting firm under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. The offense: I had republished the 2011 British documentary “Unlawful Killing” produced by Allied Star, a London-based film company owned by Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Al-Fayed. The documentary implicates – amongst other things – the British royal family in the murder of the couple and its cover-up.

Youtube and Vimeo had already deleted the video a few weeks earlier, forcing me to host it directly on the Rebel Site. Two emails sent to me shortly after by the lawyers of my hosting firm unfortunately got intercepted by the spam filter. In those emails they advised me that they had received a complaint by a London based law firm, claiming the hosting of the video was in breach of their client’s copyrights. Since I didn’t receive the emails I obviously couldn’t comply with their request, forcing my hosting company of 7.5 years to disable the site.

Grudgingly, I deleted the video as demanded to get the site back online as soon as possible. However, I sent a letter back to the lawyers, with a 10 days deadline to provide written evidence that the plaintiff’s law firm was acting on behalf of the copyright owner, Allied Star. I also sent an email to Mohamed Al-Fayed, asking for permission to publish the film. The reply of his office was swift. It confirmed that they had requested the London law firm to make me take down the video. The only reason they gave was that the film had been taken off the market.

It becomes clear, when watching the documentary, that Dodi’s father deeply loved his son and was shattered by his death. Why would he spend millions to produce and promote a documentary on the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death and shortly later take it off the market without giving much reason? The only explanation that makes sense is that he has been put under enormous pressure to do so. Not only has he been bullied to take his film off the market, but the blackmailers made it his problem to prevent others from republishing it.

Personally, I don’t respond well to bullying. I hate bullies and fight them with all available means. Thankfully I’m not alone. In this case of cyber-bullying, resistance is not only civil duty, but easy. Be warned though! It would be illegal to locate a copy of the “Unlawful Killing” documentary via any BitTorrent site and distribute it to as many people as possible. It would be illegal to burn CDs and pass them to all your friends. It would be illegal to upload the video to video hosting sites under its own or slightly altered name. And it would be illegal to create a torrent of your own on BitTorrent sites and share it for other people to download. But it is not illegal, to publish this article, share, email and republish it on your blog, and that’s exactly what I’m asking all of my readers to do. Make it go viral.

The documentary the Windsors don’t want you to watch

Dianas_LetterSo let’s go back to the “Unlawful Killing” documentary and see what all the fuss is about. The film starts by showing a letter from Diana, hand-written to her butler, predicting her own violent death. It says, “My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car. Brake failure & serious head injury.” Less than two years later her prediction came true.

The documentary next shows numerous people saying that her death was murder. Mohamed Al-Fayed, Dodi’s father, goes even further. He goes on record in the documentary saying that it was a slaughter by the ‘bloody racist’ royal family. He thinks the royal family got his son killed because they were too racist to accept a foreign, Muslim step-father or a Muslim half-brother or half-sister for the future king.

The film maker himself, Keith Allen, points out how “chillingly convenient” it was for the Windsors that the crash happened when it did. Mohamed Al-Fayed describes how Diana, in the two weeks she stayed for a holiday with her sons at his house, was worried that exactly that kind of accident would happened to her as it did shortly after. It would appear that she got warned.

The inquest

The documentary mainly focuses on the massive inquest at the Royal Court of Justice, dismissed by several speakers in the film as a cover up. They criticise that Charles, in spite of being implicated by Diana’s letter as trying to kill her exactly the way she died, wasn’t required to appear as a witness. It talks about how the Royal Court of Justice first sought to conduct the inquest without a jury, an attempt that got only overturned because of public pressure. It questions the impartiality of an inquest conducted at the Royal Court of Justice led by a “coroner” who has sworn his allegiance to the Queen, in a case where members of the royal family are the prime suspects. Not very surprising then for the film maker that the coroner appeared at times to have already made up his mind about the outcome of the inquest, before it had even started.

The whole point of the inquest was to examine the suspicious circumstances surrounding the car crash. Was it a pure coincidence that Diana had told many people that she had been warned by a confidential source in the palace, that Prince Philip had plans to deliberately kill her in a car crash, exactly the way she died? Why didn’t the CCTV cameras along the route of the crash car apparently record anything, a ‘coincidence’ the crash shares with the 7/7 London Tube attacks? Were the driver’s blood samples tampered with to make him appear wildly drunk while seeming to be sober? Why were Diana’s phone calls being bugged by the American NSA? Why were Diana’s seat belts jammed on the night of the accident, preventing her from – as she normally would – wearing a seat belt, which probably would have saved her life? Why didn’t the police identify the owners or driver of any of the five other vehicles involved in the crash? And why did it take ambulances 2 hours to transport Diana to the nearest hospital?

According to the film, the suspicious circumstances didn’t stop there. Even before the end of the medical examination of his body, the French press already published headlines according to which the driver was “as drunk as a pig”. That’s in spite of the fact that according to his hotel bill he had only had 2 Ricards, less than a quarter the amount of what French authorities claimed that he had drunk. Road sweepers were allowed by the Police to clean the site of the car crash, within hours of the accident. The film points out the similarity to the case of the Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto, where the site of his murder was hosed down by police almost immediately after the attack, obviously because it is easier to claim it was just an accident if the evidence is washed away.

At the end of the inquest, the jury had heard so much suspicious information that the coroner heading the inquest could not take any risk. In his three day instructions to the jury, he told the jury to ignore the eye-witness statements and forbid the jury to even consider the possibility of murder. The jury, however, ignored the coroners instructions and spent a whole week to carefully examine the evidence for themselves.

The media

The film also examines the negative attitude of the media towards the inquest, obviously considering it to be a waste of time. It was quite common for the journalists observing the inquest to fall asleep or manicure their fingernails instead of paying attention to the witnesses. They were only interested in information confirming the “established consensus”, established before the start of the inquest, that drunk driving and harassment by paparazzi had caused the crash, and ignored all the witness statements contradicting it. Any different view was regarded as “odd” and “conspiracy theory”. Part of the problem, according to the film, was the fact that it was the royal correspondents, not legal journalists who were covering the inquest, in spite of the fact that Diana no longer had royal status at the time of her death. You cannot expect impartiality of journalists like the BBC’s royal correspondent, whose job it is solely to “suck up to the royal family” and portray it in the most favourable light possible. But even if they had wanted to, they wouldn’t have understood the detailed evidence or how the establishment was manipulating behind the scenes which and how much evidence they were allowed to see. That’s why they didn’t question, for example, why the Royal Court censored into incomprehensibility letters of Prince Philip written to Diana. The Royal Court went even as far as forbidding close friends of Diana to tell the inquest about deeply hostile letters of Princess Philip written to Diana not long before her death.

The accident itself

The movie then describes the accident itself based on the reports of several witness statements in the inquest. Diana’s powerful Mercedes Benz quickly left the following paparazzi behind. When they entered the tunnel, they were surrounded by 4 motorcycles and a white Fiat Uno. Suddenly a very bright flashlight blinded Diana’s driver, making him lose control and crash head first into a concrete pillar. None of the other vehicles got ever identified. It’s been verified by the French police that none of the vehicles was driven by any of the paparazzi waiting in front of the hotel that night. They have all been accounted for. That didn’t stop the British media though from misrepresenting the inquest’s verdict – in a massive world-wide misinformation campaign led by the BBC – as saying that it was the following paparazzi who caused the crash. What the inquest actually established was that the vehicles surrounding Diana’s car in the tunnel caused the accident.

The ambulance

The most bizarre circumstance of the accident was probably the behaviour of the ambulance. Several ambulances arrived soon at the scene of the accident. Given the time of the day, after midnight, the streets were virtually empty. And yet, it took the ambulance carrying Diana 81 minutes to drive her to the near-by hospital, without making radio contact with the headquarter. That’s on top of the 37 minutes it took the oddly behaving doctor in sole charge of treating Diana, Jean-Marc Martino, to move the still conscious from the undamaged back of her car into the ambulance. If she had received prompt hospital treatment, the expert witnesses at the inquest all agreed, Diana would have survived.

The role of the MI6

The film coughs at the claim by the head of MI6 towards the inquest that his agency has never killed anyone in the past 50 years. It shows former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson, an inquest witness, who has written a book titled “The Big Breach” describing how MI6 had planned to murder the Serbian leader exactly the same way how Diana, Dodi and her driver were killed: making his car crash in a narrow tunnel by flashing a very bright light into the driver’s eyes. The MI6 boss was obviously lying, a view supported in the film by another former senior MI6 agent, Baroness Daphne Park, who clearly states that she’s been involved in murders on behalf of the MI6.

Diana’s campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines

According to the film, MI6 and other secret services had more reason to want Diana dead than just her plan to get married to a Muslim: her highly effective support for the world-wide campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines. Her involvement caused huge anger amongst Western governments and the armament industry. It even caused the British defence minister Nicholas Soames to call Diana on the phone and tell her, “Don’t meddle in things you don’t know anything about. Accidents can happen.”

Diana’s murder happened just three weeks before the Oslo conference to ban anti-personnel mines. Without Diana as the most prominent ambassador of the conference, most of the world’s media no longer bothered to attend. Bill Clinton was the only government leader attending the conference who voted against a world-wide ban on landmines. If Diana had been still alive, he would have to do so while looking into Diana’s eyes. According to the film, many observers believe that’s the real reason why she got killed, but the coroner of the inquest wasn’t interested in that line of thought.

Dodgy autopsy results

The autopsy of the driver, which stated that he was highly drunk, in spite of having had only two Ricards that night and appearing completely sober on the hotel CCTV captured when leaving the hotel, was performed by Professor Dominique Lecomte, a doctor notorious for her involvement in French government cover-ups. Her autopsy was ripped apart by other medical experts as completely incompetent and having made several critical mistakes, as was Dr. Lepin’s result of the blood sample taken of the driver, which was found to have been highly likely tampered with. Professor Lecomte and Dr. Lepin both refused to attend the inquest, after being ordered by the French government to do so to protect the French state’s secrets and interests. When specialist later wanted to examine whether the DNA of the blood samples was identical with that of the driver, they were told by the French government that those samples no longer exist.

Police corruption

Diana had not only spoken to numerous friends about her ex-husband’s family planning to kill her in a car accident and mentioned it in a letter to her butler. She had also written a letter to her lawyer about it who passed it on to the police. In spite of her being later killed exactly in the way described in her letter, the chief of police kept the letter concealed for three years, knowingly breaking the law by concealing this devastating evidence. He was rewarded handsomely by the Queen by being made a ‘Lord’.

Not only did the autopsy report make false accusations about the driver’s alcohol level, it even suggested that he was a severe case of alcoholic. The English police tried to support this false claim by searching the driver’s apartment twice for alcohol. The first time they went there, they could only find a bottle of champagne and a ¾ empty bottle of Martini. Unsatisfied with the result they went in again, and this time they found enough alcohol to stock an entire bar.

Diana’s embalmment

In spite of no longer being ‘Royal’ at the time of her death, Diana was embalmed within hours of her death, according to the film, to make it impossible to perform a pregnancy test. Not only were her organs removed and destroyed, but so was the blood sample taken from her at her arrival at the Paris hospital. The film suggests that this was to avoid any suggestion that Muslim blood had entered the royal blood lines.

The Queen’s private secretary

Sir Robert Fellowes was the highest ranked representative of the Windsors appearing at the inquest. Under oath, he claimed to have been on holidays for the entire period before and after the accident. Yet, the diary of Tony Blairs’ press secretary Alastair Campbell clearly states that she met Mr Fellowes on several occasions through the period he claimed to have been on holidays. Diana had mentioned to friends before that he was one of the three people she was most afraid of. She believed that Mr Fellowes hated her with a passion and wanted her out of the Royal family. The film suggests that Mr Fellowes had a leading role in the arrangements for her death.

The Fiat Uno

The prime suspect to have caused the crash is the driver of the Fiat Uno which was seen by numerous witnesses. Neither the English nor the French police was apparently able to identify him, and yet one of the best known paparazzi, James Andanson, with connections to secret services, drove exactly that kind of car. Andandon who made a fortune selling pictures of British royalties and other celebrities to the media, lived in France and was known to have followed Diana and Dodi in their last holiday before the accident. He was not part of the paparazzi crowd waiting in front of the Ritz hotel owned by Dodi’s father. When interviewed by French police about his whereabouts, he made contradictory statements, as did his wife and son who served as his alibis. In spite of these circumstances, the investigation against him was dropped and the search for the Fiat Uno ended without result. The inquest made no further attempt to establish who was driving the implicated car.

In 2000, Andason was found dead in his blazing car on a Ministry of Defense owned field outside Montpellier. He had no car keys with him and the two firemen who found him had seen two bullet holes in his skull. The French police however decided that he had committed suicide. The film maker comments that you don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to find it hard to believe that a man shot himself in the head twice and then set his car on fire.

Royal family

The last third of the film goes in full attack on the Windsors. It criticises the huge cost to British tax payers, their racism towards non-Whites and their initial strong support for Hitler. It accuses the Queen mother, her husband, as well as Prince Philip and his sisters to have been highly supportive of Nazi Germany, at least initially. It goes on to ask why the British people still tolerates the monarchy. It accuses British officials of corruption because they were more loyal to the monarch than to the people and care more about earning a knighthood than obeying the law. The film goes even as far as calling the British royal family mafia-style gangsters.

Later in the film Prince Philip is quoted as saying that if reincarnation existed he would like to be reborn as a deadly virus, so he could do something about over-population. This quote must be seen in the context of Prince Philip being the highest ranked Scottish Rite Freemason, a secret society known to aim for a ‘big cull’ reducing mankind to a ‘sustainable level’ of 500 million, that is a reduction of 93%.

The most controversial part of the documentary is an interview with leading British clinical psychologist Oliver James, describing Prince Philip as someone without any internal sense of right or wrong. According to James, Prince Philip is completely selfish and does not care about anybody else. In his expert opinion, Prince Philip is on par with notorious psychopathic mass-murderers.

Summary

The main film very convincingly argues that – in the light of the long list of suspicious circumstances and cover-ups – it would be too much of a coincidence that Diana got killed exactly at a time when Western secret services and armament manufacturers were infuriated about her anti-personnel landmine campaign and the Windsors about the prospect of a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King.

My own first reaction, when I heard about Diana’s death, was to say that it was staged by the MI6. Like Mohamed al-Fayed and other people in the documentary, I suspected that the British royalties were too big bigots to let her get married to a Muslim man from the Middle-East. What I didn’t know back then was that Diana’s mother was a born Rothschild, making her and her children Jews according to Jewish law. I’m more inclined now to think that her murder was performed by Mossad, not so much to stop her anti-personnel mine campaigning or to avoid a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King, but to prevent Diana from converting to Islam, which she would have to get married to a Muslim man. This obviously would have spoiled the endless Jewish bragging over the future British King being a Jew.

Bieber Bollocks. Why Do We Keep On Allowing Them To Play Us As Fools?

So the Globalist pop sensation Justin Bieber’s media circus rolls on. This vile example of the controlled music industry just can’t seem to follow the script.

Good look, Justin

Good look, Justin

So he really cocked up when he appeared 2 hours late at the O2. Listen Justin you silly little boy, the UK is too smart to put up with over rated jerks messing them about. The customer buys a ticket, you turn up on time and sing a few songs, not brain surgery.

Then last night, “Just-in” time to try to win back public support, poor little Bieber is taken poorly on stage. Yes, we’ve all seen the video of you chucking up during a previous concert, what a true hero you are. After 20 minutes, he bravely continues the gig, only to be then taken to hospital.

Good move JB, we’re starting to feel sorry for you again.

justin-bieber-hospital

Then this outrageous image appears in the press. Bieber in hospital, what a foul piece of media propaganda. Almost naked, covers pulled down enough to expose underwear, hand in a rather suggestive position! Totally contrived bullshit. Still the Biebettes, or whatever they are called have probably fallen for it. Then this happens:

Nice one Justin, good job. Are those guys TSA rejects?

justin 2

justinweed

justin bieber illuminati

What a complete Wassock. We know the game you’re playing JB, we know.

Papa Smurf

Papa Smurf

Bieber

Bieber

Investigation Into Jimmy Savile’s Tea Parties For Police

Savile PartyCOPS who visited Jimmy Savile’s penthouse for tea parties dubbed the “Friday Morning Club” are to be quizzed over their links to the paedo DJ.

Up to nine serving and retired officers were part of his inner circle who met at his pad every week for over 20 YEARS.

Many were apparently on duty at the time.

It comes as another cop from the same West Yorkshire force is probed for allegedly acting for Savile before other officers quizzed him over sex claims in 2009.

Police yesterday confirmed they are investigating the get-togethers in Roundhay, Leeds. They said there was no evidence of wrong-doing.

Savile, who died in 2011, is said to have abused 450 youngsters.

Read More:

ROTHSCHILDS WANT IRAN’S BANKS. DON’T SAY YOU WEREN’T WARNED.

 Pete Papaherakles writes an interesting piece in American Free Press.

“The Rothschilds exert powerful influence over the world’s major news agencies”

Could gaining control of the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (CBI) be one of the main reasons that Iran is being targeted by Western and Israeli powers? As tensions are building up for an unthinkable war with Iran, it is worth exploring Iran’s banking system compared to its U.S., British and Israeli counterparts.

Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control.  Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.

Islam forbids the charging of interest, a major problem for the Rothschild banking system. Until a few hundred years ago, charging interest was also forbidden in the Christian world and was even punishable by death. It was considered exploitation and enslavement.

Since the Rothschilds took over the Bank of England around 1815,  they have been expanding their banking control over all the countries of the world. Their method has been to get a country’s corrupt politicians to accept massive loans, which they can never repay, and thus go into debt to the Rothschild banking powers. If a leader refuses to accept the loan, he is oftentimes either ousted or assassinated. And if that fails, invasions can follow, and a Rothschild usury-based bank is established.

The Rothschilds exert powerful influence over the world’s major news agencies. By repetition, the masses are duped into believing horror stories about evil villains. The Rothschilds control the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the IMF, the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements. Also they own most of the gold in the world as well as the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold every day. It is said the family owns over half the wealth of the planet—estimated by Credit Suisse to be $231 trillion—and is controlled by Evelyn Rothschild, the current head of the family.

Objective researchers contend that Iran is not being demonized because they are a nuclear threat, just as the Taliban, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Qadaffi were not a threat.

What then is the real reason? Is it the trillions to be made in oil profits, or the trillions in war profits? Is it to bankrupt the U.S. economy, or is it to start World War III? Is it to destroy Israel’s enemies, or to destroy the Iranian central bank so that no one is left to defy Rothschild’s money racket?

It might be any one of those reasons or, worse—it might be all of them.

Read More

Discredited BBC Still Spinning The Old Global Warming Lie.

attenborough gore

Al “Man Bear Pig” Gore and Attenborough

At a time when the BBC is falling apart before our eye’s, and a good job too in my opinion, the one person you wouldn’t think be part of their controlled propaganda machine would be David Attenborough. But no, he is as bad as the rest of them. I spotted this post on James Delingpole today. A few day late, sorry but I’ve been busy.

No, David Attenborough: Africa hasn’t warmed by 3.5 degrees C in two decades.

It’s not often one looks to the Guardian’s environment pages for an incisive and thorough critique of green propagandising. But hats off – really – to Leo Hickman for this ruthless deconstruction of an erroneous claim made by David Attenborough on his latest BBC nature documentary that in the last twenty years Africa has warmed by 3.5 degrees C.

3.5 degrees C in two decades? That would indeed be a remarkable temperature rise in anybody’s money. (Remember, since 1850 global mean temperatures have risen by about 0.8 degrees C – and we’re supposed to find that worrying and significant). Which is why, you might have thought, the BBC would have spotted so obvious an error and removed it before the programme went out.

 

Read more

Lies, lies, lies. By just that one untruth, Attenborough has lost all credibility. On the other hand, Dr David Bellamy sacrificed his career to expose the truth. You’re a hero Bellamy.

A truth hero of our time, Dr David Bellamy.

A truth hero of our time, Dr David Bellamy.