Blair Warns Britain Needs To Take Action In Iraq And Syria – Or Face Terror Attacks.

Blair on SKYJust when I was having a really enjoyable Sunday tending to my veg in the garden, I decided to take a 10 minute sit down for a cup of tea and a quick scan of the latest MSM tosh. OMG, I wasn’t disappointed.

I remember reading some time ago, that people like Blair are such narcissistic characters, so detached from the real world that they really have no understanding of even care about how transparent their agenda is.

Anthony  Charles Lynton Blair this morning said Britain needed to take action in Iraq and Syria – or face terror attacks at home. Nice one Tony, how is the Middle Eastern Peace Envoy job going?

How on earth does a discredited man creature like Blair have the gall to dare give his opinion on anything these days is beyond me, and should be beyond any sane thinking person.  The only thing he has ever been ever fairly good at is  being  a smarmy yes man to the globalist masters pulling the strings, oh and making a vast fortune since leaving Downing Street, prostituting himself to anyone willing to pay hard cash to hear him talk, part time jobs with JPMorgan Chase(I wonder who they are connected to?) and scurrying around the Middle East jumping from conflict to conflict. 

At school  he was a complete pain in the backside and they were very glad to see the back of him source. He tired his hand at being a rock music promoter, and failed. He played in a rock band called (you’re going to love this) Ugly Rumours. He went to Oxford and got a 2nd, then moved in with Derry Irvine Chambers, where he met Elsie Tanners step daughter. He wasn’t great at the legal profession, completely out shone by Ms Booth. In the Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner case, he was representing the employers who where fighting to deny female workers holiday pay; he lost. However, Derry Irvine later became Blair’s first Lord Chancellor, so it wasn’t a complete waste of time. Talk about jobs for the boys.

It is alleged that during this period, in 1983 to be exact, a Charles Lynton was was fined £50 for attempted soliciting in city toilets, the police notes were to disappear later along with several prior verbal warnings. I mention this because for the system to function, the powers need very naughty stuff to blackmail their puppets, and it seems Blair has quite a few skeletons in his closet.

So here we have it, Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, saying on SKY News, yes, even that made me laugh, oh the irony of it, SKY News of all places. SKY News for any none UK readers is the UK equivalent of FOX News, and controlled by Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch is the former husband of Wendi Deng, who it has been alleged, mainly by the Daily Mail was a little to close to Anthony Charles Lynton Blair source.

Murdoch and Wendi

I don’t really buy this story, (although I have enjoyed writing about it previously), it has a whiff of the Cliffords about it. How better to confuse questions about Blair’s sexual preferences than by creating a story about him over the side with Wendi. It’s a real shame her and Lord Murdemort have split up, they always looked so well suited to each other. (Tale as old as time)

Anyway, dragging myself back to the point at hand, SKY News, the free voice of the globalists, gave Blair a platform, and did the BBC,  to warm about ISIS, and how if we don’t get involved, the terrorist threat will be even greater than it currently is after he and boy Bush sent other peoples children into Iraq and Afghanistan on the back of a lie to justify Blair’s sycophantic grovelling deal made to Dubber previously.

So Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, even for the less awakened members of the British Public, you are a totally discredit has been, who will one day have to answer for your betrayal of the honest men and women in the street, who put their trust in you, and were let down in the most dishonorable manner when you sold your soul to the devil.

For everyone’s sake, please keep your opinions to yourself, we don’t trust you, we don’t like you, and most of all, we don’t want you to hear from you.

Love is a many splendid thing. Bit of a funny old handshake?

Love is a many splendid thing.



 

Advertisements

End Sexual Violence in Conflict. Angelina Jolie and William Hague.

Don’t they make a great, and I have to say unlikely couple, Angelina Jolie and William Hague at the “End Sexual Violence in Conflict” summit.

The MSM are claiming Jolie was moved to tears after listening to victims of sexual assault speak about their experience.

jolie and hague

 

Good performance, Angelina, what is your profession again? Oh an actress, shame you weren’t  moved enough to actually produce real tears.

Jolie

Look just for the record, here is how it’s done by true pro’s.

 

George Osborne at Thatchers Funeral

George Osborne at Thatchers Funeral

See the difference! If you buy this load of garbage, you’ll buy anything.

Bum Gate. Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton’s Exposed Bottom Shunned By UK Tabloids.

Kate BumWhat a load of old fanny, well, not exactly true, as it was her back bottom exposed in the German press today, not her front, but you get the point. Although the self-righteous British media refused to print the sneaky peaky shot of Goldilocks Middleton’s derrière,  they still filled a lot of column inches talking about it. Whether it is the fall out after Leverson, or that they smelt a big fat rat, who knows. Even LBC, London Broadcasting Corporation,  London’s Biggest Conversation, Leading Britain’s Conversation,  “Loada” Biased Codswallop, got in on the act today, with old Fleet Street hack, the Murdoch loving Nick Ferrari conducting an on air poll to see if they should publish the image or not. with the result unsurprisingly being not to publish. If you really want to see the image, go to Bild here. We have covered up the cheeky bits, not because we are frightened of publishing the Royal keister, after all it’s not the first “up skirt” shot of Kate, but Bild paid good Euro’s to secure the rights to her tuchas photo (I’m running out of bottom words, although that last one is quite apt, very Jewish), so there must be copyright issues here.

My real feeling is that she, and Prince Willy, were well aware of the chances of a good bum shot happening. After all, Willy is a helicopter pilot, so he must have at least a basic understanding of up draft, or whatever it’s called. It happened before in Canada, when again her posterior was exposed to the public. As my old mum would have said, “at least wear a slip dear, or some sensible knickers”

dianaWilly’s mum, St Diana of Goldsmith (allegedly) fell foul to the skirt gaff very early in her media manipulating career, so you would have thought they would learn by their mistakes. Hang on, that shot got huge media coverage all over the world!

Or were they hoping to get the cheeky shot covered by the UK media to force more control on them, you know, the invasion of privacy stuff, and the UK media decided on mass not to bite? Nah, I don’t buy that one, seeing as how the media is controlled by the Global Elite.

Or were they hoping that the alternative media would jump on the publish and be damned bandwagon. Can’t see that either, because this happened in public, so there can’t be a privacy issue, and as for bad taste and offensive, not a chance. £2 million to refurbish Kensington Palace for this pair, now that’s offensive.

There is however quite a history of naughty Royal snaps. It is said that Princess Maggie had a bit of bother with some porno quality photos of her and a close friend who didn’t exactly fit the normal Royal boy friend demographics. Up kilt shots of both Prince Philip Battenberg and Prince Charles Saxe-Coburg and Gotha aka Charles Windsor. Shots thought to be of Prince Andrew full frontal naked jumping into a lake, the famous Sarah “Massey” Ferguson  topless toe sucking. Shots reportedly showing Willy’s willy, and of course the holiday snaps of Kate topless, so by these standards, a pair of bum cheeks is quite tame.

No, which ever way I look at it, my conclusion, they knew full well there was a good chance of the “botty shotty”. Why else would she wear a flimsy dress and thong (if indeed she is wearing any underwear at all). Or they are just simply incredibly naive and stupid.

North Korea, MSM Lies Exposed As Hyon Song-Wol Reportedly Appears On TV

Hyon-Song-WolNorth Korea, MSM Lies Exposed As Hyon Song-Wol Reportedly Appears On TV. It’s a miracle, Hyon Song-Wol the executed former girlfriend of Kim Jong-Un has made an appearance on TV delivering a speech at a national art workers rally in Pyongyang, so reports the Mail this morning see here, after reporting her execution on 29 August last year. see here

Fascinating stuff, and a great example of how these controlled media outlets demonise whoever their current target is. Just a few months later, the Mail reported that his Uncle was stripped naked and fed to a pack of dogs. see here.

Incidentally, in the report today, they can’t even get the country Kim Jung-Un is leader of correct,here’s a screen shot taken at 05.35 this morning.

North Kor

No dear Daily Mail editors, Kim Jung-Un is the leader of North Korea, not South Korea, for gods sake, try to get the basics correct. If you’re going to make stuff up, at least make it believable.

The point here is that we know nothing about North Korea, most people don’t even know where North Korea is, so when the media report these “boggie man ” stories, most of us accept it as fact. Here’s another example of the media campaign against Kim Jung-Un. see here. I’m no apologist for North Korea, but will not base my judgement of that country on the propaganda spread by the West, look where that got us with Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Syria, oh, and so on.

Saint Gary Barlow Tax Avoidance Hypocrite.

gary barlowAnyone who has read previous posts on here will know that I’m not a big fan of celebrity “do gooders” and all the wonderful work they do for “charity mate”.Gary Barlow OBE is a prime example of these self-important hypocrites.

He is without doubt a very talented writer and musician, no argument from me on that one, he has become very wealthy because of his talents, again, no problem here. Where I have a major problem with these people is their very public support for charities like Comic Relief & Children in Need, while hidden in the shadows they are scheming together to find ways to avoid paying tax. Now on the surface that may seem to be fair enough, after all, who likes to pay tax?

What is being missed by the thousands of adoring fans of Saint Gary Barlow is that you’re all being played as total mugs!. We all sit there watching Children in need, along comes Peter Kaye, or James Corden with some Gary Barlow related song or sketch, and we, the downtrodden lowlife plebs at the bottom of the food chain pledge money we can’t afford to help children, or disadvantaged people around the world, who shouldn’t be in that situation in the first place. Because they are so good at convincing us to support these orchestrated good causes, they get awards, i.e. an OBE, or even a Knighthood from the Queen, whose personal wealth could solve these problems overnight, and still leave her with more than enough. The trouble is, the adoring Barlow fans are probably the same people who believe the Royal family myth, but that’s another story.

Anyway, lets just suspend reality for a moment and pretend that the motivation behind Barlow’s charity work is genuine, why go to such lengths to avoid paying his fair share of tax? The only answer is greed. The more you’ve got, the more you want. Look here’s the bottom line, every rich celebrity or indeed anyone who avoids paying their share of tax, increases your tax burden, and this applies to giant corporations  whose whole setup is to get maximum profit with minimum tax.

I’m sure Gary is a lovely boy, but by trying to avoid paying tax, he’s stealing from you and me.

Mail Pushing The “Global Warming” Hoax, Again. Give Me Strength, And A Snorkel.

Oh Ellie, Ellie, Ellie, I expected better from you. As science and technology journalist for the Mail you’ve really pulled out all of the globalist stops today! To be totally honest Ellie, after reading your piece titled Would YOU be underwater if the polar caps melted? Map reveals what our planet would look like if sea levels rose by 260ft” I had to check the date, no, it wasn’t April 1st.

What really hacks me off about these scare mongering pieces is that they are designed to spread fear in order to justify the global warming con trick forcing crippling carbon taxes on all of us.

I’m not going to do a line by line breakdown of the whole article like Spivey does for two reasons, I don’t have the time, or the intellect, however, a few things do need pointing out.

I worked on this map for about, gathering the data and rendering all the labels,’ said Mr Vargic, speaking to MailOnline. ‘It was entirely digitally hand-drawn, based on gathered topography data from Nasa.” (1)Exactly how long is about? (2)This post is entirely digitally hand typed. (3) We all trust everything NASA tell us.

‘I was always interested in the future climate change and human influence on the global warming. I created these maps both to raise awareness about the global warming and also because nobody has yet done this on such a scale” I can see that, I’m interested in future climate change, that’s why I watch the weather forecast.  Human influence on global warming, nice one, say it often enough and they all believe it. Oh, and nobody has done this on such a scale because nobody else wanted to waste their time on this nonsense.

Don’t get me wrong, the map is great, in fact the best piece of digitally hand drawn work I’ve seen in ages, based a a big fat global lie.

article-2609338-1D3C27C200000578-854_964x655

 

“According to recent studies, there is enough ice in Earth’s polar caps to cause about 250-300ft (80–100m) rise of the sea level,’ he said on his website.” This one’s got me a bit confused. Firstly, and I may be wrong here because I was educated by the same system that is trying to destroy us, the ice at the north pole is floating. So it must be floating on water, with me so far. OK, now when Archimedes’ went all wrinkly sitting in his bath working out his principle  that when upward buoyant force that is exerted on a body immersed in a fluid, whether fully or partially submerged, is equal to the weight of the fluid that the body displaces, he sort of hit upon something. Therefore the amount of ice at the north pole has already displaced it’s own weight in water, so if it melts, which it isn’t going too, there is no change. Try it yourself, get a glass of water and pop a couple of ice cubes in, thus simulating the north pole. Mark the level of water on the glass. Come back when the ice cubes have melted, Eureka no change. Please note, this isn’t technically 100% correct but near enough to make the point.

On 8 September 2013, the Mail wrote a lovely little piece on Global Cooling, and how the Arctic ice is increasing, read here

MoS2 Template Master

Anyway, not to be out done, we have created a digitally hand drawn map to show what will happen if the water rises by 8848.1 meters.

gore map

And finally, I’m fairly sure that Co2 increases because of the planet warming due to normal climate variations, mainly influenced by the sun, not the other way round. They can’t yet tax the air we breathe in,  so they tax the Co2 we breathe out. I’m off to watch some cows farting.