Bum Gate. Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton’s Exposed Bottom Shunned By UK Tabloids.

Kate BumWhat a load of old fanny, well, not exactly true, as it was her back bottom exposed in the German press today, not her front, but you get the point. Although the self-righteous British media refused to print the sneaky peaky shot of Goldilocks Middleton’s derrière,  they still filled a lot of column inches talking about it. Whether it is the fall out after Leverson, or that they smelt a big fat rat, who knows. Even LBC, London Broadcasting Corporation,  London’s Biggest Conversation, Leading Britain’s Conversation,  “Loada” Biased Codswallop, got in on the act today, with old Fleet Street hack, the Murdoch loving Nick Ferrari conducting an on air poll to see if they should publish the image or not. with the result unsurprisingly being not to publish. If you really want to see the image, go to Bild here. We have covered up the cheeky bits, not because we are frightened of publishing the Royal keister, after all it’s not the first “up skirt” shot of Kate, but Bild paid good Euro’s to secure the rights to her tuchas photo (I’m running out of bottom words, although that last one is quite apt, very Jewish), so there must be copyright issues here.

My real feeling is that she, and Prince Willy, were well aware of the chances of a good bum shot happening. After all, Willy is a helicopter pilot, so he must have at least a basic understanding of up draft, or whatever it’s called. It happened before in Canada, when again her posterior was exposed to the public. As my old mum would have said, “at least wear a slip dear, or some sensible knickers”

dianaWilly’s mum, St Diana of Goldsmith (allegedly) fell foul to the skirt gaff very early in her media manipulating career, so you would have thought they would learn by their mistakes. Hang on, that shot got huge media coverage all over the world!

Or were they hoping to get the cheeky shot covered by the UK media to force more control on them, you know, the invasion of privacy stuff, and the UK media decided on mass not to bite? Nah, I don’t buy that one, seeing as how the media is controlled by the Global Elite.

Or were they hoping that the alternative media would jump on the publish and be damned bandwagon. Can’t see that either, because this happened in public, so there can’t be a privacy issue, and as for bad taste and offensive, not a chance. £2 million to refurbish Kensington Palace for this pair, now that’s offensive.

There is however quite a history of naughty Royal snaps. It is said that Princess Maggie had a bit of bother with some porno quality photos of her and a close friend who didn’t exactly fit the normal Royal boy friend demographics. Up kilt shots of both Prince Philip Battenberg and Prince Charles Saxe-Coburg and Gotha aka Charles Windsor. Shots thought to be of Prince Andrew full frontal naked jumping into a lake, the famous Sarah “Massey” Ferguson  topless toe sucking. Shots reportedly showing Willy’s willy, and of course the holiday snaps of Kate topless, so by these standards, a pair of bum cheeks is quite tame.

No, which ever way I look at it, my conclusion, they knew full well there was a good chance of the “botty shotty”. Why else would she wear a flimsy dress and thong (if indeed she is wearing any underwear at all). Or they are just simply incredibly naive and stupid.

North Korea, MSM Lies Exposed As Hyon Song-Wol Reportedly Appears On TV

Hyon-Song-WolNorth Korea, MSM Lies Exposed As Hyon Song-Wol Reportedly Appears On TV. It’s a miracle, Hyon Song-Wol the executed former girlfriend of Kim Jong-Un has made an appearance on TV delivering a speech at a national art workers rally in Pyongyang, so reports the Mail this morning see here, after reporting her execution on 29 August last year. see here

Fascinating stuff, and a great example of how these controlled media outlets demonise whoever their current target is. Just a few months later, the Mail reported that his Uncle was stripped naked and fed to a pack of dogs. see here.

Incidentally, in the report today, they can’t even get the country Kim Jung-Un is leader of correct,here’s a screen shot taken at 05.35 this morning.

North Kor

No dear Daily Mail editors, Kim Jung-Un is the leader of North Korea, not South Korea, for gods sake, try to get the basics correct. If you’re going to make stuff up, at least make it believable.

The point here is that we know nothing about North Korea, most people don’t even know where North Korea is, so when the media report these “boggie man ” stories, most of us accept it as fact. Here’s another example of the media campaign against Kim Jung-Un. see here. I’m no apologist for North Korea, but will not base my judgement of that country on the propaganda spread by the West, look where that got us with Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Syria, oh, and so on.

Saint Gary Barlow Tax Avoidance Hypocrite.

gary barlowAnyone who has read previous posts on here will know that I’m not a big fan of celebrity “do gooders” and all the wonderful work they do for “charity mate”.Gary Barlow OBE is a prime example of these self-important hypocrites.

He is without doubt a very talented writer and musician, no argument from me on that one, he has become very wealthy because of his talents, again, no problem here. Where I have a major problem with these people is their very public support for charities like Comic Relief & Children in Need, while hidden in the shadows they are scheming together to find ways to avoid paying tax. Now on the surface that may seem to be fair enough, after all, who likes to pay tax?

What is being missed by the thousands of adoring fans of Saint Gary Barlow is that you’re all being played as total mugs!. We all sit there watching Children in need, along comes Peter Kaye, or James Corden with some Gary Barlow related song or sketch, and we, the downtrodden lowlife plebs at the bottom of the food chain pledge money we can’t afford to help children, or disadvantaged people around the world, who shouldn’t be in that situation in the first place. Because they are so good at convincing us to support these orchestrated good causes, they get awards, i.e. an OBE, or even a Knighthood from the Queen, whose personal wealth could solve these problems overnight, and still leave her with more than enough. The trouble is, the adoring Barlow fans are probably the same people who believe the Royal family myth, but that’s another story.

Anyway, lets just suspend reality for a moment and pretend that the motivation behind Barlow’s charity work is genuine, why go to such lengths to avoid paying his fair share of tax? The only answer is greed. The more you’ve got, the more you want. Look here’s the bottom line, every rich celebrity or indeed anyone who avoids paying their share of tax, increases your tax burden, and this applies to giant corporations  whose whole setup is to get maximum profit with minimum tax.

I’m sure Gary is a lovely boy, but by trying to avoid paying tax, he’s stealing from you and me.