Anyone know where I can buy some incontinence pants, because I’ve just pmsl. Another classic load of old rubbish from the Mail today read here.
If you want to read the article, feel free, what a load of old nonsense. I’m not knocking Harvey Nichols’ Beyond MediSpa, I’m sure they are very genuine, although the image included in the article is so obviously “Photoshopped” it’s a joke. The images are supposed to have been taken 4 weeks apart. It’s the same image, same shadows, same clothing, same colour tone, same moles. Bra line identical, thong line identical, 1st image soft focus, 2nd image, bit of work around the front bottom area, slight difference where the front bottom thong has been altered, tummy moved in a bit, oh and image 1 is slightly magnified, but it’s still the same shot.
However, that’s not what made me laugh, it was the shot of Goldilocks Middleton and the volley tummy. Ha Ha, is it April 1st, nope just checked it’s November 24. That image was taken sometime in October.
I don’t want to labour the point here, not that Kate would understand what that means, but we did cover this a few weeks ago see here.
If that is the tummy of a woman who a couple of months ago really gave birth to 8lb 6oz Prince George, then there is no hope for any of us.
What has happened here is damage limitation. What are the chances of getting a shot of the royal flesh when she’s not on holiday? The volley tummy shot was never meant to have happened. It did, questions were asked, this article comes out a few weeks later to sort of make it plausible. Nice try, but I don’t buy it.