Royal Propaganda Machine Working Overtime.

queen (1)These are very odd times. The country is bankrupt, both physically and morally with the globalist master plan unfolding in plain view before our very eyes. 90% of the population (conservative estimate) so dumbed down and and hypnotised by the deliberate mind control system, that it doesn’t even have to be done covertly any more.

I switched on the news this morning,  to be force fed images of the lovely new Royal parents cooing over Prince George. Yesterday we had Diana’s eldest son giving what appeared to be a well rehearsed “off the cuff” interview about the problems of being a new parent, lack of sleep blah blah, and how it’s much worse for Catherine, yeah, right Wills, we all really buy into that one.

Well, to be fair, most people actually do buy into it. I wonder how long it will be before we see the articles about how quickly Goldilocks Middleton has regained her amazing pre-pregnancy figure?  Anyway, getting back to the subject, while the country is being crushed and destroyed, we are all being force fed this drivel  about another royal baby. If you really think all of this new parent junk is true, I suggest you go back to watching Jeremy Kyle.

I was actually thinking about “Queen of Hearts” Diana Sunday night while lying in the bath. Not an image that you really needed, just painting a picture of where I do my thinking, but I had just watched for the second time  Helen Mirrens film “The Queen”. I was never a Diana fan, sorry if that upsets people, but in my opinion, she was as fake as the rest of them.  Well, she was of course very much one of them, poor little Jewish girl who started to believe her own press. The whole idea that she went into the marriage with the heir to the throne expecting him to be faithful only to her is laughable. She was a Spencer, or maybe a Goldsmith, depending on who Daddy really was. Her mother, the Shand-Kiss woman was a Rothschild.  Just to clarify the Daddy bit, in case you didn’t know, the word on the street is that Diana was Jimmy Goldsmiths daughter, and when you see photo’s of Jemima and Zac it fits nicely, and of course Fanny and Jimmy were said to be lovers. The point is, that this bed hopping was nothing new to her, it was in her DNA. It becomes even more complex when you consider Queen Victoria’s real father was said to be a Rothschild, but I digress.

The Queen of Hearts was really the “Queen of Spin”. When I hear all the tosh about the press hounding her, it makes my stomach churn. She was a master of manipulating them for her own ends, they knew it, and loved it. As Nick Ferrari said the other morning, any story about Diana on the front page, added thousands to the circulation.

Diana became a loose cannon. She was privy to insider information that could have finished the bunch of inbred’s off for once and for all. So although she was always one of them, they are not adverse to culling out the trouble makers for the greater good of the firm. Did she deserve to die in that tunnel in France, of course not, any more than hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children being slaughtered in the globalist funded wars being played out across the globe.

aroAnyway back to the film “The Queen”. It was good to see Michael Sheen playing Tony Blair, a role he reprieved in the Twilight Saga, along side Helen McCrory playing Cherie Booth, a role she reprieved in Harry Potter. Talk about the propaganda machine working overtime. My problem with films like that, The Kings Speech, or even Shakespeare’s Richard The Third, is that people actually believe that they are real, and history becomes re-programmed. Helen McCory

Nothing we think we know about these people is real, and to coin that well used praise from a “Few Good Men”, “You Can’t Handle The Truth”, because the truth is way beyond the comprehension of most people. These people are void of any form of compassion and empathy. We are their cattle, servicing their greed and need for power, and as long as the sheep (deliberate use of mixed metaphors there) choose to remain blind to the truth, they will continue to farm us for their own ends.

The good news is that a growing number of us are seeing them for what they really are, and as soon as we choose to step outside of their control system, we are no longer the cattle.

 

Advertisements

Princess Diana’s Death, New Evidence or Something Darker?

carWhow, it’s all over the MSM today, the SAS was responsible to the murder of Diana and Dodi. Here’s a little snippet from the Mirror.

“Police are investigating a sensational claim that the SAS was involved in the death of Princess Diana, reports Sean Rayment.

The allegation emerged at the second court martial of Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who was found guilty of illegally possessing a gun and ammunition.

It came in a letter to the elite unit’s commanding officer by the parents-in-law of a special forces sniper, known only as Soldier N, who was Sgt Nightingale’s former house mate and a key witness for the prosecution.

The letter said Solider N boasted the SAS “was behind Princess Diana’s death”.

The Ministry of Defence, the Royal Military Police and the Service Prosecuting Authority have known of its existence and the claim since it was sent in September 2011. Full article here

My question is, what is the agenda here? Why would the MSM suddenly start running stories in the week of the anniversary of her death. And again, why are they still using the image of the car after the roof had been removed by the rescue services?

As damaged as the Mercedes was, it looks very different before they started to started working on it.

Princess_Diana_inquest_photos_6

Obviously that image is as misleading as the rest, because the impact zone is not visible, bit the point is, the MSM have been sitting on this for 16 years, anyone who truly believes Henri Paul was responsible should go back to watching Eastenders, so what’s going down, why suddenly bring up the SAS story?

Could it be that the weight of the Alternative Media is now getting so strong that the MSM are going to start doing what they have always had a duty to do, investigate to get to the truth?

Don’t hold your breath.

Interesting piece here:

The Mysterious Deaths of Princess Diana, Jill Dando, British Intelligence, CIA Snoopers, SAS, William Hague and the VIP child-abuse connection

Jonathon Ross Crisis, Producer Suzi Aplin Axed

rossNot that I really care much, but I see Ross has axed Chris Evans former lover Suzi Aplin. Ouch I did a bit of a tabloid thing there by mentioning  egomaniac Chris Evens, just to get his name in the article. Actually, Evans and Ross are quite similar, well of the same era anyway, both are egomaniacs, but at least Evans has talent.

Anyway, back to poor old Suzi, if she is feeling a little down at the moment, don’t worry, it’s not your fault. The drop in viewing figures has nothing to do with the production side of the un-watchable program, trust me.

I Forgot About Sam William. Swilliamism.

swilliamismDam, I am embarrassed, you know the feeling when you intend to do something, and forget all about it!

Bilderberg came and went, I posted a brilliant video by Sam William, who in my humble opinion is one of the best video bloggers in the UK, and then forgot to add his YouTube feeds to Alternative News Network, sorry Sam.

I’ve now rectified my error, although I’m not sure if his new videos will appear automatically, but in the meantime, get over to his channel, the guy is a genius.

Judge Nigel Peters, The Face Of British Justice

Judge Nigel PetersShe was 13 years old Your Honour, 13 years old, and you in your stupid wig said to paedophile Neil Wilson the girl was ‘predatory’ and ‘egging you on’. So you gave him a suspended sentence! Weren’t you the same person who presided over the acquittal of perverted choirmaster Stephen Douglas-Hogg on child sex charges?

But, if I remember correctly you prosecuted former Essex cricketer Mervyn Westfield for match-fixing. (thanks to the Mail for doing the work on this one)

He was jailed for four months after he admitted accepting £6,000 from a gambling syndicate to bowl so that a specific number of runs would be chalked up in the first over of a match between Durham and Essex in September 2009.

I wonder if that’s connected with you being a member of Marylebone Cricket Club at Lord’s and serve as chairman of its membership committee?

And just for the record, the Mail reports that before studying law at Leicester University, Judge Peters was educated at the Hasmonean Grammar School for Orthodox Jews in Barnet, North London.

Anyway, what does that matter, but she was still just 13, not cricket is it Your Honour.

Governor Of The Bank Of England Mark Carney Shows Who’s Boss.

Bank of englandMark Carney, President of UK PLC, sorry new Canadian Governor of the Bank of England has laid down his first dictum to control and squeeze us, in line with the wishes of his globalist masters, in his first presidential address.

Mr Carney, has decreed that interest rates will remain low until unemployment falls to below 7 %. Now the Globalists have officially taken control of the Bank of England, along with the Federal Reserve, the bankers are now openly dictating economic policy for the UK.

Now call me an old cynic, but I remember the good old days when the Government steered the economy, but since the “Trojan Horse” new labour government allowed the bankers to totally take over the UK, we are already just part of the Globalist run “New World Order” with a puppet government in place to placate us and divert our attention from what is really happening. Gordon “bigoted woman” Brown, apart from almost giving away half of the UK’s gold reserve, handed over power to set interest rates to the very people who will profit most.

So what does low interest rates really mean? Well, it’s worth pointing out that the low interest rates only really affects savers. Whereas a few years ago it was normal to get 6 or 7% for normal savings, you now get 0.5%. So, who wins, the bankers of course. You give then £1000, they pay you £5 instead of £70 per year. Using that wonderful trick of fractional reserve lending, they can lend £10,000 on the strength of your £1000, and then charge whatever interest they decide, but it certainly won’t be 0.5%. So lets say they charge 5% on the £10,000 for 1 year.
Remember, you gave them £1000, which will cost them £5. They lend £10,000, of which £9,000 is made up out of thin air, they make £500 in interest, plus they get back £10,000 making a total of £10,500. You take back your £1000, they pay you £5 in interest, and earn £9495.

Yes, they have created £9495, and it’s cost them £5. No wonder Fred Carney wants to keep interest rates low. (did I really type Fred Carney, oops, bit of a Freudian slip.

It is fair to point out that that is a deliberately simplistic example of banking. It is in truth far more complex, and their ability create wealth out of your suffering is without limits. Money is in fact nothing more than debt. A bank note is only a promissory note to pay something that doesn’t exist.

Happy days.