New Years Honours List. Tracey Emin Gets A CBE.

So the New Years Honours list for 2013 has been published. This embarrassing relic of Britain’s former colonial power is always received with mixed blessings.

Not wishing to dilute the joy that receiving any gong from the establishment gives to many worthy people, there are an awful lot of people in there who you simply ask, why?

For example, Hector William Hepburn Sants former Chairman of the Financial Services Authority, who is about to take of a position with Barclays. I was listening to James Max on LBC 97.3 today while performing my morning ablutions. He was ranting about whether   Hector had received a Knighthood for failing in his capacity as Chairman of the FSA. He was in charge during the financial crash, so Max was suggesting he shouldn’t have been awarded the knighthood. How wrong was James Max, (where is Steve Allen when you need a bit of sense on a Saturday morning) Max was arguing on the assumption that Sants had failed! The truth is that Sants probably did exactly what was required of him, hence the knighthood.

Now Tracey Emin is another matter altogether. She has received a CBE, or Commander of the British Empire, which is one pip down from getting a knighthood, or in her case  being made a Dame. When I started writing this post it was going to question why dear Tracey should be awarded a CBE at all, but now it is crystal clear.

emingoodimaginationShe is brilliant! Anyone who can convince that amount of people that they are a talented artist and pay for the stuff they creates is a genius.  I’m no art critic, but I know what I like and I have to say the sketches of Ms Emin CBE, naked playing with her “lady bits” doesn’t do much for me, but if people are prepared to pay for it, all power to you girl, and a big shout out to the Margate possy.

Tracey_Emin

This is of course not a sketch by me, but a Photoshoped image from Tracey’s website.

In fact I thought I would give the old art thing a go myself, so here is my portrait of Tracey Emin CBE. Any good ?

Facebook Censoring Alternative Media Sites, Really, You Surprise Me!

homerOld Christopher D Spivey is kicking off over on Spivey again today, well actually yesterday to be honest, but I’ve not gone to bed yet, so it’s still today to me.

He’s done a great piece on Piers Morgan, to which all I can say is pay him more CNN, keep the Smuck over there, and yes, I know what a smuck is, although it is based on circumstantial evidence.

But the real story that got me going on Spivey is the Max Keiser post regarding Faceache taking down alternative media sites. I agree with a lot of the stuff Spivey posts, and of course, I agree with this one, but it’s not really news, this has been happening for months. The media war has already started and we only have ourselves to blame.

How on earth have we, supposedly intelligent people allowed our global masters to dominate a free internet in the way they have. Forget eBay and Paypal for a minute, their guys have been attending Bilderberg for years, or so I’m led to believe, but the four main internet sites people use today are Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Google.

As far as the social media sites go, these have to be the greatest con trick in the history of mankind. We all rush to post our most intimate details on them for the world to see. They are nothing but a massive overt information gathering network. They are there for a reason, and that reason is not to spread the word about the Globalist agenda, of course they are going to shut down pages that tell the truth they don’t want people to know about. DOH!

YouTube has been shutting down channels for ages, because it is owned by Google. It’s not a friendly video sharing site anymore, everything is controlled and monitored. If you post a video (funny how we still use that word) of a cat doing a handstand on top a blokes bald head the clip[ stays up. Try posting a video exposing the corruption that is controlling the world, different story.

And as for Google, OMG, it places little programs on your machine that monitor your usage, can take over your webcam without your knowledge, and now tries to force you to sign in before you can do anything. Do you honestly think the searches you bring up on Google are anonymous, or indeed accurate? We have noticed very strange things happening to our ratings on Google in recent months.

Kick them all out, stop using them. There are alternatives out there. If you use Blogger, get rid of it, use an independent platform like WordPress, or better still self host like we do. Use one of the privacy guaranteed search engines like Ixquick or Duck Duck, you really don’t need a Hoover to vacume a carpet.

Stop using the very tools they have put in place to control you, “simples!” (Is that copyright, I do hope McAlpine hasn’t got shares in Meerkat .com)

Oh, and yes, we do use Twitter and Facebook ourselves, as a mirror auto post of this site. We started on Facebook a couple of months ago, I’m sure my 4 followers would be devesated if we vanish.

Subliminal Message In New Kellogg’s Advert.

This isn't the new ad, but I thought the context was quite symbolic.

This isn’t the new ad, but I thought the context was quite symbolic.

“From the moment you are born, you are defined by a number”. That is the opening line of a current Kellogg’s cereal advert, so seemingly innocent, tacked onto the front of an advert.  So innocent in fact that you don’t even notice it, but that subliminal message is all part of the control mechanism that the globalists, of which Kellogg’s is alleged to be part, beam at us every day.

So why is it a subliminal message? It is normalising the fact that we are all numbered, catalogued and counted from birth to death. At birth you receive a birth certificate, at death you are written off with a death certificate. In between you are part of the stock of whatever country you live in.

You are fed the illusion that you are free because it’s easier to control things that believe they have a choice.

The MSM has hypnotised you every time you switched on the brain wash box in the corner of the room or read a newspaper for decades. Technology has stepped up the pace now so this dumbing down control mechanism is pumped into you every time you use your cell phone, computer, or any other gadget that has become an essential part of life.

So, here is the truth that you need to learn to break away from this control system.

If you think you are free, living in a free society, you are under the Globalists control.

If you know that you are living in a Globalist controlled society, you are free. It’s as simple as that.

Once you understand that, the dark veil will start to lift allowing you to see things as they really are. The more people that realise this, the quicker the control system will start to crumble. They know this which is why they are moving fast to control alternative information including the internet. They also know that in percentage terms they are far outweighed by the real people. They account for a tiny percentage, i.e. the very tip of the pyramid.

OK, let me explain, they can only control you in this way because they divert your attention onto make believe situations, i.e. TV shows etc.  They hide what they are doing in open view because they know we only see what we want to see. Remember that line in the Da Vinci code when the Police didn’t see them escape in the car from the jet plane. It’s the same trick every stage magician uses; they just do it on a global scale, they are masters of miss-direction.

The good news is that it will only take a small percentage of people to wake up to what is going on for it to all appear in plain view. If just a small percentage understand that money is nothing more than shared debt created by the Bankers to control us, or that all major religions are one of the major control mechanisms used for thousands of years to keep us subservient to some fake deity, while pitting one clan of pseudo religious followers against another, creating massive wars to destabilise us, while they create billions of dollars for themselves.

Wake up people, religion is a smoke screen created to manipulate and control. Do you really think that Jesus of Nazareth would look on Ratzinger as his representative on Earth. Sitting there in his gold palace in Rome, what a fine example of Christian love he is.

To beat them, you must learn their techniques, and simply understand what they are doing. We are so conditioned to believe what we are told, right from tiny children when if teacher said it was right, we knew it was right. To be honest, it makes you a bit paranoid because you look at any news story and question the real agenda.

Take Sandy Hook for example, what the hell was going on there? We get Obama, wiping tears from his eyes, except I didn’t actually see any tears, video footage of a grieving parent talking about his little girl, but caught on film a few seconds before the main event laughing and mouthing the same words as the voice over, as if it was a carefully rehearsed script. I don’t know if that was genuine, or a set up, but something about that film made me very uneasy.

All I’m really trying to say here is be aware of how they manipulate and control you. Facebook, Twitter, & Google all have hidden agendas. That’s why they are fun to use, to draw you in.

Take my advice, bin them all, as soon as possible.

Globalist Herman Van Rompuy Puts Pressure on Cameron In The Continuing EU Pantomime.

von rompyIt was interesting to read in today’s Mail that “Damp Rag”, Herman Van Rompy Pompy, our esteemed leader of Europe is putting pressure on “call me Dave”. Cameron is of course, half heatedly trying to placate the Euro skeptics in the Tory party by appearing going through the process of negotiating a better deal for the UK.

Van Rompuy has basically said to Tory boy Dave, take it or leave it.

“David Cameron will not be allowed to ‘cherry pick’ powers to claw back from Brussels, the EU president has warned.

In a major blow to the Prime Minister’s strategy, Herman Van Rompuy said the European Union would fall apart quickly if countries were allowed to pick and choose which powers they wanted to keep.

Mr Van Rompuy said he wanted Britain to stay in the EU, adding that the UK’s departure would ‘see a friend walk off into the desert’.

But he insisted that he would block Mr Cameron’s bid to secure a better deal for  Britain if it involved repatriating significant powers to Westminster.” Read more.

When will they stop this farce. We know already that they are only acting out a pre-written plot. Cameron has no control over what the UK can or cannot do in Europe. The three bankster stooges Blair, Brown and Mandleson signed away the UK’s sovereignty in the whole “New Labour” con. The UK has, by design been taken over and there is nothing Cameron can or will do about it.

When you consider that UKIP is the UK’s only chance is getting out of this mess, you realise how desperate the situation is.

 

Massive Food Shortages On The Way. Banks Buying Up Wheat & Grain.

wheat-priceWe wrote earlier this year about the hyped drought situation, and how it was a fake ploy to hike up food prices. Well, as predicted there was no drought, hosepipe bans imposed to make us believe this load of garbage were reluctantly removed as more water fell from the sky than has in living memory. (please note, the use of the word “sky” is in reference to the area above our heads and has no connection to BskyB, in case Google or Murdochs News International are planning on taking action regarding copyright grounds. I don’t really want to be sent to ChillingEffects.org.)

Anyway, we had some friends round today for a festive game of “Newmarket” and “Spoons”, and the conversation came round to the wet weather and the effect it will have on food prices. As they work in the farming industry, they seemed to be the right people to get a clear view of the situation. “through the roof” was the response to my question about the wet conditions effects on prices. He then went on to say something very disturbing,  “the price of wheat is going to sky rocket”.  Not his exact words but you get my drift. “How do you know that for certain”, I probed. It transpired that a neighbouring farmer had just sold a massive amount of stockpiled grain to a guy from a major high street bank!  “If those f—–s are buying up the stuff, it can only mean one thing, massive f—–g price rises on the cards”

So there you are, the banksters who forced this economic crisis on us (all planned), are now buying up the raw materials for our daily bread. And, if this is true, they must be doing the same everywhere, with anything they can use against us for profit.

Happy new year everyone.

 

Paedophile Twitter Accounts Closed After Hackers Expose Content.

I Googled for an image under “Twitter Child Abuse”, and found this on page 1 line 3. Just a random image, Click on it to see who Tweeted it is lmao.

You may have seen this report in the Mirror on Christmas Eve.

“A string of Twitter accounts have been closed after they were revealed to contain disturbing images of child abuse.

The graphic pictures were apparently made public late last night after hacking groups claimed to have broken into the private accounts to expose their indecent content, the NSPCC said.

The charity said it received a “flurry” of reports overnight relating to at least half a dozen Twitter accounts which were later disabled.

They will now be investigated in the US, where the micro-blogging site is based.

An NSPCC spokesman said: “Apparently these were pretty disturbing images of child abuse.

“We understand the authorities in the US are now looking at the accounts.”

The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) said it had also received around 30 reports, relating to at least four accounts.” Read More

Well, if you are an avid reader of Spivey like me, you will know the real story behind this report. If not, follow this link. I won’t re-post it here as Chris has his own unique style.

Satire: Ho, Ho, Ho! 9/11 Was An Inside Job!

Santa Claus
The Onion
December 25, 2012

Seasons greeting from your old friend Santa! My, my, Christmas is just two short weeks away, and everyone here at the North Pole can’t wait to deliver presents to all youcoca-cola-christmas-santa nice boys and girls this year. Yes, Jolly ol’ St. Nicholas hopes you’re all being as good as can be!

But today, Santa would like to tell you all about something very naughty, something very, very naughty indeed. Dear children, have you not heard? Why, 9/11 was an inside job! Oh, ho, ho, my, yes it was!

I mean, look at the facts, boys and girls! We already know the Bush administration was itching to go to war in Iraq, now, don’t we? Yes, indeed we do, my darling ones! The Downing Street memo proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Then you look at the Presidential Daily Briefing of Aug. 6, 2001, the one headlined “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” Ignored! Why, children, they threw that briefing aside like used wrapping paper on Christmas morning, didn’t they?

And remember, sweet little ones, Bin Laden never claimed responsibility for the attacks until 2004. Do you know how many years that is, boys and girls? Something was up the government’s sleeve, and I’ll let you in on a little secret: It wasn’t sugar plums, oh, no! No, it was the ties between the bin Laden and Bush families. They’ve been under the mistletoe for decades, if you catch your old pal Kris Kringle’s meaning! I’ve checked my list twice, and it seems Arbusto Energy, a Bush business, had financial connections to Salem bin Laden, half-brother of Osama. The CIA actually helped create and fund al-Qaeda right around the time Bush Senior was the agency’s director—ho, ho, ho, ol’ H.W. stuffed their pockets as fat as a Christmas goose!

Now, as for the towers themselves: The type of steel they used melts at a temperature of about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, and as I’m sure all you smart little boys and girls know, jet fuel burns at 1,500 degrees, tops. My darlings, you’d need quite a Yule log to create that extra 1,200 degrees, wouldn’t you? Oh, what a glorious sight it would be!

Of course, you do know what they found in the Ground Zero debris, don’t you? Would you like St. Nicholas to tell you? Well, then, hop up on his lap and I’ll whisper it in your ear: traces of nano-thermite. Does that jingle any bells upstairs? Nano-thermite is an explosive compound, children, capable of making the biggest Christmas cracker you ever saw! So what in the name of Donner and Blitzen was it doing in the world’s largest banking complex? Was Lehman Brothers or one of the insurance companies stockpiling explosives? No, children. You find nano-thermite where there’s been a controlled demolition. Ever see a controlled demolition, little ones? That’s where the whole building plummets straight downward like a plumb bob and every floor is destroyed. Even if the building is struck in the middle.

Oh, dear, perhaps ol’ Santa has just gone a little nutty in the head, like dear Mrs. Claus repeatedly likes to claim! Perhaps, much like Mrs. Claus, Santa would be better off pretending the facts don’t exist. But you believe, don’t you, children? You believe in Santa’s theory.

Now, I’m not saying the hijackers weren’t naughty. They were very, very naughty indeed. But if you want to really talk naughty, there’s not enough coal in Santa’s sack for a government that throws its own citizens under the sleigh just to gain political power.

Ho, ho, ho, so many questions dance through Santa’s head! What about the six eyewitnesses who saw a low-flying jet immediately after Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, children? Why was debris from the flight found miles away from the crash site? And why did the BBC incorrectly report that 7 World Trade Center had collapsed moments before it actually did? Talk about a snow job, eh, young ones? Why, it’s a veritable winter wonderland!

Perhaps this Christmas, Santa will bring some of you very well-behaved—and discreet—young children some nice, shiny new computers to play with, so you can go to 911truth.org, watch Loose Change on YouTube, and see for yourselves. Because if you ask Santa, the truth needs to come out in order to properly honor the memory of the victims and awaken a duped populace, slumbering away in their cozy beds, living in dreamland. We can close our eyes and drink the government eggnog, or we can raise our voices and demand to know what really happened. Isn’t that right, boys and girls?

Well, I’ve still got a lot of toys to build before Christmas Eve, my little ones, but I’ll be visiting you all very soon—ho, ho, ho, that is if I’m not jailed as an enemy combatant for asking simple questions!

Read More

Alex Jones Talks To David Icke: The Illuminati Are Manipulating Your Reality


Alex talks with British writer and public speaker David Icke. David is the author of numerous books, including Love Changes Everything and Remember Who You Are: Remember ‘Where’ You Are and Where You ‘Come’ From.

The Globalists Are Making Their Move

Reposted from Tap.ObamaEvilEye_poster-500x386

Kevin Field writes

Americans have again had a horrific shooting in which children were targeted for killing, this is the latest of a series of similar attacks, Mossad informants tell us that Connecticut was chosen because they were the first US state to ban Mercury fillings in peoples teeth and plan to take this across the USA along with an anti-Flouridation in the drinking water programme.
Rothschild owns all the Mercury mines and the only real use for it is in peoples teeth, strangely if you spill Mercury on the floor it is deemed so toxic that a team will come out in one piece suits to dig it from the floorboards, yet they fill our kids teeth with it, it is possible that this was a revenge attack on Connecticut exactly as claimed.
The main  reason for the government School attacks psyops against the US electorate is so the people call for a gun ban,
the people need to be made defenceless before the government can implement the Fema camp legislation and
lock up all dissidents and “useless eaters”.
The Rothschild’s planned and funded the 1917 Russian revolution allowed Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin to bring starvation and mass murder to the people and the US communist system is now bringing it to you, but first you must be disarmed.
The 9/11 attacks have been exposed as the biggest false flag attack of modern times, that a government would do this to its own nation is evil of the highest order, yet alone what it is doing to Iraq Afghanistan Libya Syria etc
many Americans are saying ” our senate would not do this to us ” yet they fund and  allow the genocide of Palestinians and the wiping of Palestine from the map so why wouldnt they allow this too ?
Whistleblowers in both Britian and the USA say a US civil war has long been planned, the population will be intentionally decimated in line with Bilderberg goals.

Keith Allen. Unlawful Killing.

470_unlawful_killing_110513

Keith Allen’s film exposes the in-plain-sight cover up of what happened to Diana in Paris in 1997 and her cold, heartless and disgusting treatment by this cold, heartless and disgusting family – including the way that the judge at the excuse-for-an-inquest ordered royal correspondence with Diana from people like Prince Philip to be censored before being made public. Does this remind anyone of how the judge at the excuse-for-an-inquiry into North Wales child abuse ordered that famous political names could not be mentioned by the victims?

The film exposes the pathetic irrelevance of the mainstream media which is just an arm of the same Establishment which it is alleged to be ‘reporting’ – with a few honorary exceptions scattered here and there. This is the BBC’s ‘royal correspondent’, Nicholas Witchell, one of the most pompous people I have ever met, depicted in the film fast asleep more than once while inquest evidence was being heard.
Unlawful Killing is the incredibly important and highly revealing ‘inquest of the inquest’ that reveals overwhelming evidence of a massive Establishment cover up in the UK and France and this is why it has not been seen in the UK but can be watched now on an overseas website.
Keith Allen said around the time of the royal wedding in 2011, when Diana’s son, William, married Kate Middleton:

‘Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we’re showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Republicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.’

Mohamed Al Fayed is no angelic being of sweetness and light either, but the point of this film is to show how what happened to Diana was systematically covered up by the alleged inquest into the death of her and Dodi Fayed. From this comes a simple question: why would there be a cover up if there was not something highly significant to cover up?
A clinical psychologist describes Prince Philip in the film as a man devoid of guilt, empathy and love – precisely the character traits of the royal and ‘elite’ bloodlines worldwide that I have been exposing for nearly a quarter of a century. The royal family as a whole are described as ‘gangsters in tiaras’. Even this is mild compared with their sick and sordid past and present.

UKIP ‘Now The UK’s Third Largest Party’

evs-xtaccess-2012-12-16-cam-c-09h38m58s20-1-522x293Sky News today is reporting that UKIP is now the UK’s third largest party. Here is the report:

The UK Independence Party has surged to a record poll rating, knocking the Liberal Democrats into fourth place.

The ComRes poll for The Independent on Sunday and the Sunday Mirror put UKIP on 14% – a six-point gain on last month and the party’s highest rating in a ComRes poll.

Two other polls in Sunday newspapers – the Observer’s Opinium and the Mail On Sunday Survation – also put UKIP at 14%.

The findings will alarm Tory MPs who fear the party is haemorrhaging support over issues such as Europe, the economy and its support for gay marriage.

The ComRes poll, which interviewed 2,002 people online between December 12 and 14, put the Conservatives on 28%, down three points from a month ago and 11 points behind Labour, who are down four on 39%.

Support for the Lib Dems is down to single figures at 9%, a one-point fall on the month, which puts five points between them and Nigel Farage’s party.

Mr Farage told Sky News: “All the way through UKIP’s history people have doubted what UKIP can achieve.

“We’ve shown in the last two European elections what we’re capable of – and I would remind people in 2009 that we came second across the entire United Kingdom.

“And what’s happened in 2012 is that all the big issues that we’ve campaigned long and hard for for many, many years – and taken much abuse for – those issues have become absolutely at the centre ground of what people out there are talking about.

“Unless we see some really substantial change from the Government and from the Labour party in particular – with a U-turn on Europe, open-door immigration, gay marriage and other things – there’s no reason to think that this level of support for UKIP can’t be maintained.”

Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles told Sky’s Murnaghan programme that he takes UKIP, which he describes as “a party of dissent”, very seriously.

“They represent a voice, and I am very firmly of the view the only way to deal with is to get dug in, and to fight them on the ground on community issues,” he said.

But Mr Pickles said this does not mean the Tories should not form a pact with UKIP.

“I think it is absolutely wrong (that it can be) always assumed that some kind of deal could be done and people would flood back to us. Governments sometimes have to make some very difficult decisions,” he said.

He also said: “I think it’s important that if we do have a referendum on our future with Europe it’s got to be on the basis of not trying to outsmart UKIP or trying to ensure that we can bring the whole conservative party in one – it should be in the national interest.”

Read More:

Prince Charles Reported To The Revenue Over ‘well entrenched tax avoidance scheme’ On £18m Earnings.

Prince Charles has been reported to the revenue over claims the Duchy of Cornwall is a ‘well entrenched tax avoidance scheme’.prince-charles-empty-vision-2
Clarence House defended the Prince of Wales’ financial arrangements today after “Republic” compared the royal to Starbucks and Google, who recently come under the spotlight for their tax arrangements.
Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, said it had written to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and Margaret Hodge, chairwoman of the Public Accounts Committee, asking them to investigate the £728 million organisation’s tax arrangements.

Below is a copy of the letter.
Anti Avoidance Group (Intelligence)
HM Revenue & Custom
CTIAA Intelligence S0528
PO Box 194
Bootle
L69 9AA
13 December 2012

To whom it may concern

I wish to raise with you the matter of the Duchy of Cornwall, which I believe is using a highly questionable
interpretation of its legal status as a means of avoiding corporation tax obligations.
The Duchy operates as a corporate entity, engaging in property management and other commercial
activities. In its own words, “the principal activity of the Duchy is the sustainable, commercial
management of its land and properties.” [Duchy Annual Report 2011/12]. It makes an annual profit of
around £18m.
Currently the Duchy pays no corporation tax at all.
The Duchy claims that there is no distinction between the Duchy – the organisation that operates on a
commercial basis – and Prince Charles – who, as the Duke of Cornwall, heads the Duchy and receives its
profits as personal income. In their words, “The Duchy is not subject to Corporation Tax as it is not a
separate legal entity for tax purposes.”

I believe this lack of distinction between the Duke and the Duchy to be erroneous and nothing more
than a well-entrenched tax avoidance scheme.
In support of my view a recent Information Rights Tribunal ruled that the Duchy is a separate legal person.
In Bruton v IC and The Duchy of Cornwall & The Attorney General to HRH the Prince of Wales
(EA/2010/0182) the tribunal found that, “whatever the basis of the Duchy under the 1337 Charter, we find
that the Duchy is now a body or other legal person.”
In the tribunal’s findings the reasons for rejecting the notion that the Duchy is a separate legal entity are
set out at length, specifically on pages 13-17 [see
http://preserveportnavasquay.co.uk/doc/20111103_Decision_EA20100182.pdf%5D.
The logic of the Duchy’s argument is that if they were to pay corporation tax then Prince Charles would
be taxed twice on the same income, as he voluntarily pays income tax on the profits that are handed to
him from the Duchy.

However, in any other corporation shareholders, owners and employees must pay income tax while their
company pays corporation tax. The company is deemed a separate legal entity which has its own tax obligations. Any profits or income derived from the company by owners, shareholders or employees is
after tax and any such income is also liable for personal income tax.
The clearest analogy with the Duchy is that of a company with a sole shareholder, who in any other
circumstances would pay income tax on their dividend. The company would also be liable separately
for corporation tax.

I would therefore ask that you investigate this matter and take the necessary steps to ensure that the
Duchy is paying corporation tax in line with normal practice for corporate entities.

All the best
Graham Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Republic
Cc: Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Chair of Public Accounts Committee

Piers Morgan Shows True Globalist Colors On CNN Following Connecticut Massacre

Piers Morgan, sacked editor of the UK Daily Mirror, after publishing alleged fake photos of British servicemen abusing Iraqi prisoners, loses his temper in the aftermath of the horrific Connecticut massacre.

Enjoy this gift from your cousins in the UK, if you watch CNN, you deserve him.

By the way, he is also a former Murdoch man.

Newtown School Shooting Story Already Being Changed By The Media

To eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooterMike-adams-health-ranger2

Mike Adams
Natural News
December 15, 2012

The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.

As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question: “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?”

One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.

According to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”

Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.

Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being “scrubbed” from the news

As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.

FoxNews reported that this second gunman was “led out of the woods by officers” and then questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut Post.

A local CBS affiliate was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said “Police believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon van with its back window blown out…”

ABC News also originally reported, “A second gunman is apparently at large. Car-to-car searches are underway.”

A local CT CBS affiliate was also reporting, “CBS News reports that a potential second shooter is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and telling parents on the scene, ‘I did not do it.’”

But the more recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a second gunman and going with the “lone gunman” explanation, which holds about as much water as the “lone gunman” explanation of the JFK assassination.

“A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning shooting spree,” reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.

NBC News is also now chiming in with the “lone gunman” version of the story, eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the tragic event.

Another story authored by NBC News carries the title, “26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut elementary school.” Once again, no mention of a second gunman as reported by eyewitnesses.

When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy

Journalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?

And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?

This story is continuing to develop, and we’ll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?

For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.

About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health author and award-winning journalist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored and published thousands of articles, interviews, consumers guides, and books on topics like health and the environment, and he has authored and published several downloadable personal preparedness courses including a downloadable course focused on safety and self defense. Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes. In 2010, Adams co-founded NaturalNews.com, a natural health video sharing site that has now grown in popularity. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support consumer advocacy programs. He’s also the founder and CEO of a well known email mail merge software developer whose software, ‘Email Marketing Director,’ currently runs the NaturalNews email subscriptions. Adams also serves as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a non-profit consumer protection group, and regularly pursues cycling, nature photography, Capoeira and Pilates. Known as the ‘Health Ranger,’ Adams’ personal health statistics and mission statements are located at www.HealthRanger.org

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.html#ixzz2F84B8h5M

David Icke. The Reason Lord Alistair McAlpine Has Not Taken Legal Action Against Him

Alexander Baron

Alexander Baron

Back on November 18  2012 we wrote a post asking why Lord Alistair McAlpine had not sued David Icke  . Fair enough question we thought, still haven’t had an answer yet, didn’t really expect one either. After the early panto performance by the BBC and ITV having to cough up large chunks of dosh while we all shouter  “He’s behind you”, things have gone pretty quiet on the McAlpine Twitter front.  (Do you know anyone who either settled out of court, or has been sued?)

So, I got quite excited tonight when I found an article posted on Digital Journal by Alexander Baron under the heading  “Op-Ed: Why Lord McAlpine will not sue David Icke for libel

At last, here are all the answers I’ve been waiting for. Well, I read the article a couple of times and was a little disappointed at the reason given, it’s because David Icke is a nutter. Well thanks for wasting my time Alexander Baron, semi-retired cyber journalist, how much time did that take you?

Here is the section where he reveals this outstanding piece of journalistic research

Lord McAlpine could sue David Icke, so could many other people, but they don’t and almost certainly never will. Why?

Because defamation is that which lowers one’s reputation in the eyes of right thinking men and women. Thus, a Times or BBC report that brands a man a paedophile, a murderer, or even a mere thief, may well damage his reputation, because – their political detractors aside – these media outlets have their own reputations. If you read something in the Times or hear it broadcast by the BBC, you can be assured with a high degree of confidence that the news you have digested is true. Can the same thing be said in all honesty about David Icke?”

I don’t normally swear, but I nearly pissed myself laughing, “If you read something in the Times or hear it broadcast by the BBC, you can be assured with a high degree of confidence that the news you have digested is true.” What MSM planet is Alexander Baron on? What that sentence should read is “If you read something in the Times or hear it broadcast by the BBC, you can be assured with a high degree of confidence that the news you have digested is manipulated to sell whatever agenda they are currently trying to hypnotise you with today .”

Maybe that’s a little unfair, after all, the Times is owned by Murdoch, and as for the BBC, need I say more.

As usual, I digress, so the big secret as to why Alistair McAlpine hasn’t sued Icke is because Icke isn’t a trustworthy news source. I really don’t think it works like that Mr Baron, David Icke has grown from the most ridiculed man on the planet, to a respected leading campaigner against the system that controls me, and more so, you. The difference between us Mr Baron is that I have started to open my eyes to the evil control system that operates on this planet. Do I blindly believe everything Icke says, no, I don’t blindly believe anything anyone says, I take the time to do my own research and form my own opinion.

Baron then goes on to explain how David Icke would not be able to defend any action taken against him. What the hell is the point of including that when you haven’t yet made a decent case as to why Alistair McAlpine hasn’t, and Ted Heath didn’t go after Icke!

He finishes, with this classic paragraph

“In this case though, the trolls have directed their malice against the wrong person, and have paid the price. Mr Icke can continue to rant and rave, and probably will, but no one who matters is listening, including Lord McAlpine.

Not quite the way I would sum up the situation, still even Alexander Baron is entitled to his opinion. If you want to class people seeking the truth as Trolls, that’s your choice, and I will defend your right to do so, except, this whole story comes out of the disgusting Sir Jimmy Savile, paedophile friend of the Royal family case, so my judgement is a little clouded.

While on the subject of suing people, McAlpine never sued Scallywags magazine either. He claims it was because they were going bankrupt. John Major did of course, and successfully won the case after they wrongly claimed he was having an affair with Clare Latimer in 1993. How could he have been, the poor old grey chap was too busy having rumpy bumpy with Edwina Curry. Talk about “go to work on an egg”

I was going to finish this piece by suggesting that you have a look at some of the art collection McAlpine used to own before he donated it to an Australian Art Gallery, including some by work by Artist Graham Ovenden, but to be fair, that would be a cheap shot at the respected tax exile. Anyway, I don’t really understand art, show me a masterpiece  by Constable or Turner and I see incredible talent, show me some of Ovendens grubby work, and all I see is a dirty old pervert.  Perhaps I should spend more time watching BBC Four.

What Is the Truth Behind The Hoax Phone Call & Jacintha Saldanha’s Death?

King Edward VII Hospital.

I’ve been holding fire on posting my feelings about the “Hoax Phone Call / Dead Nurse” story because things just do not add up in my simplistic head.

Before I continue, we have to face the fact that this poor woman is dead, nothing in this post is intended to undermine her suffering or that of her friends, family or work colleagues, and as with anyone when tragedy strikes, our thoughts are with you.

OK, back to this very strange story, why do I have bad feelings? Well, it simply does not add up or make sense.

  1. Why exactly was Kate Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, or Windsor as we know her in hospital in the first place. They say it was morning sickness, really? I know the Queen Mother’s excuse for constant medical treatment was fish bones stuck in her throat, but a seemingly healthy young woman in hospital for morning sickness?
  2. The King Edward VII Hospital is very used to dealing with Royal visitors, sorry patients. Wasn’t this the same place that dear old Prince Philip Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderberg-Glucksberg , sorry Battenberg, sorry Mountbatten, went this year to have one of his many MOT’s? Worth mentioning here that the Duke is not Greek, as is often portrayed. He shares the same Great Grandmother, Queen Victoria, as was his wife, Queen Elizabeth II. Other Royal customers include Elizabeth Saxa-Coburg-Gotha, AKA Windsor, AKA The Queen, her late sister Margaret, Prince Charles, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Countess of Wessex with her ectopic pregnancy. In fact, the hospital was founded by Agnes Keyser, a mistress of the then Prince of Wales – soon to be King Edward VII, as a hospital for sick and wounded officers returning from the Boer war. So, how on earth could a second rate radio station in Australia get through security and actually speak to the ward that Kate was supposedly in? There is, in our opinion only one answer, the call was supposed to get through to back up the morning sickness story. If you’ve heard the tape you will realise that apart from the unbelievably poor impersonation, that would fool no one, the girl DJ refers to Kate as “my grand daughter”. Sorry dear reader, there is no way a NHS hospital would fall for this, let alone the premier private hospital in the UK.
  3. Right from the very start of this story, it has been suggested that this poor women committed suicide! How can that be said before an inquest? It may well be correct, and now the MSM are suggesting a suicide note has been found, but all we really know at this stage is that she is dead.
  4. Why did one of the presenters Michael Christian say that the decision to broadcast the call “goes far above”. The emphasis on “far above” is very important here and infers that the decision came from the very top.
  5. Why would putting a spoof call through to another nurse lead to someone taking their own life?

Nothing about the official version of this story makes any sense. I’m not going to speculate on the truth behind what’s going on here any further, but my feeling is that it is a lot darker than we are being fed by the MSM. One thing is certain however, Mel Greig and Michael Christian are bit part players in this whole saga, it’s not their fault.

Global Climate Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago, UK Met Office Admits

Despite playing a key role in advancing climate change hysteria, the United Kingdom’s National Weather Service, known as the Met Office, quietly released a report last week conceding that so-called “global warming” actually stopped more than 15 years ago. The startling admission shows once again that United Nations theories and climate models are wildly inaccurate at best, experts say, meaning multi-trillion dollar schemes to deal with alleged human-caused “climate change” are at the very least severely misguided.

According to the latest UK Met Office report, first reported by the Daily Mail, there has been no noticeable increase in global temperatures since early 1997. The alleged warming trend supposedly observed from 1980 to 1996 was about as long as the current “plateau” period, the paper reported. Prior to that, climate scientists admit, global temperatures had been stable or dropping for decades, a fact that prompted previous generations of climate alarmists to sound the alarm about the supposed dangers of man-made “global cooling.”

“Climate models are very complex, but they are imperfect and incomplete. Natural variability [the impact of factors such as long-term temperature cycles in the oceans and the output of the sun] has been shown over the past two decades to have a magnitude that dominates the greenhouse warming effect,” Georgia Tech climate science department chief Professor Judith Curry told the Daily Mail. “It is becoming increasingly apparent that our attribution of warming since 1980 and future projections of climate change needs to consider natural internal variability as a factor of fundamental importance.”

The Met Office temperature data report is known as Hadcrut 4 because it is compiled by the Met Office’s Hadley Center and the now-disgraced Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — the institution at the center of the infamous ClimateGate scandal that exposed so-called “climate scientists” fudging numbers, covering up contradictory data, conspiring to attack dissenting experts, and unlawfully trying to evade freedom of information requests. Unsurprisingly, the CRU’s discredited boss, Phil Jones, downplayed the significance of the latest findings.

Despite having claimed in 2009 that if there were no warming for 15 years it would be time for climate alarmists to “get worried,” Jones now says 15 years is not a long enough span to draw any conclusions. At least 20 years will be needed before the climate hysteria can be reconsidered, the controversial climate activist — he styles himself a scientist despite his unabashed activism — told the Daily Mail, adding that the ongoing lack of global warming “could go on for a while.” He apparently still thinks this decade will be warmer than the last, though he admitted that the wild climate models predicting doom were based on multiple uncertainties.

“We don’t fully understand how to input things like changes in the oceans, and because we don’t fully understand it you could say that natural variability is now working to suppress the warming,” Jones admitted to the paper, apparently acknowledging what skeptical climate scientists have been attempting to convey for years. “We don’t know what natural variability is doing.”

Also in 2009, meanwhile, the alarmist Met Office predicted that three of the next five years would set new world records for warming. Now that the data has proven the wildly alarmist prediction false, however, a spokesperson for the agency had no comment on it. Still, the Met Office, like Jones — both depending largely on taxpayer funding that will dry up if and when climate hysteria disappears — also tried to downplay the latest data. “Choosing a starting or end point on short-term scales can be very misleading,” a Met Office spokesperson said. “Climate change can only be detected from multi-decadal timescales due to the inherent variability in the climate system.”

The Hadcrut 4 information comes from thousands of monitoring points around the world, including more than a few spots that have been criticized for being too close to artificially warm urban areas. Still, the latest report totally contradicts alarmist forecasts about surging temperature increases that have served to justify massive expenditures of taxpayer money around the world. For experts, it is only more evidence that making global decisions on the basis of bogus climate models is a bad idea.

“The IPCC expresses great certainty in the results of the models — which is completely unfounded. A number of natural climate cycles are excluded, even though these cycles produce significant changes in temperatures,” Executive Vice President Ken Haapala with the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) told The New American earlier this year. “The ultimate test of models is their ability to predict the future. As measured by satellites, there has been no global warming for over a decade, which the models failed to predict. The divergence between measured temperatures and predictions is increasing.”

More than a dozen climate experts, including professors at the most prestigious universities in the world and scientists who worked with the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), also told The New American in recent months that the global warming models were deeply flawed at best. The latest report from the Met Office — virtually ignored by the world media despite the press’s tendency to trumpet even the most absurd climate scaremongering — confirms those suspicions yet again.

The spectacular implosion of the alleged “science” behind now-discredited global warming theories in recent years has led many experts and scientists to distance themselves from the hysteria. However, some apparently oblivious politicians, even in the United States, where the public has largely become hostile to the alarmism and proposed “solutions,” continue to insist that taxpayers must fund ever more expensive and grandiose schemes to stop “climate change.”

“By the way, yes, my plan will reduce the carbon pollution that is eating our planet because climate change is not a hoax,” President Obama said at a campaign rally last week, absurdly portraying the essential gas CO2 exhaled by humans and consumed by plants as a “pollutant” in need of regulation. “More droughts and hurricanes and wildfires, that’s not a joke. That’s a threat to our children’s future, and we can do something about it.”

Critics say that even if the debunked climate models were accurate and human-caused carbon dioxide emissions — a tiny fraction of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere — were contributing seriously to global warming, the half-baked, multi-trillion-dollar efforts to stop it would still be absurd. More likely, however, is that the increasingly embattled global warming scam is an attempt to help foist global governance on the planet while extracting even more wealth from the people of the world, opponents of the alarmism tell The New American.

Whether the latest Met Office report will eventually be covered by the world press remains unclear. What has become certain, though, is that supposed climate “scientists” and models predicting imminent doom were wrong yet again. Spending even more trillions on ineffective “solutions” to deal with a dubious alleged problem that may not even exist, then, would be not just a total waste of resources, but a dangerous proposition that could see the out-of-control UN handed even more power. Experts say it is time to return to reality and put the climate scam to rest once and for all.

Source

X Factor Final Results Tonight. Is It Finished In The UK. Who Cares!!!

Simon Cowell greeting his adoring fans.

To me, X Factor is the show that ruins a good summer.

As soon as it starts my heart sinks, because you know the Sheeple with be all consumed by it until Christmas. At least Dancing On Ice has the anticipation of the odd broken limb to spice things up.

So it came as quite a surprise to find it featuring on Drudge today, although to be fair, the story was about it’s poor ratings this year.

The bottom line here is that the MSM produce these trite brain dead programs to hypnotise the masses into not caring what is happening around them. Never mind that we are about to invade Syria, which could spark off world war III.

Funny really, I don’t even know why I’m posting this. If you know anything about X Factor, the chances are you wouldn’t be reading this anyway.

Royal Nurse Pranksters At 2dayFM Taken Off Air

The two Australian DJ’s Mel Greig and Michael Christian at the center of the Royal pregnancy hoax call prank have been taken off air until further notice. Fair enough, but the headlines in the UK are so vile they make you want to vomit. The Mail splashed all over today’s issue ‘You have her blood on your hands’: World horrified by sick pranksters who boasted even as tragedy unfolded – and now they’ve been taken off air.

There’s nothing like jumping on the bandwagon is there. Please explain what is sick about the second rate call they made? It was nothing that any broadcaster wouldn’t do given the same circumstances. If there is any blame here, it has to be the procedures in place at the hospital. What happened to this nurse between taking the call and her being found dead that drove her to this sad end?

This pair in Australia saw an opportunity to poke fun at the  circus surrounding the Royal announcement  Yes, it’s turned tragically wrong, and we mustn’t dilute the awful outcome, but don’t blame the radio hosts, they were just doing their job.

 

Royal Nurse Dead. Lets All Celebrate The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s Happy News.

The nauseating media circus that surrounds the announcement that The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting their first baby, or babies rolls on, and has claimed it’s first victim.

I don’t really want to dwell on the poor nurse, Jacintha Saldanha. who was found dead today, but really feel that we need to point out the hypocrisy of the media and the royals. Earlier today the The Independant wrote: Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge were reported to be angry at the intrusion.  Now, however, a palace spokesman has been quoted as saying that “at no point did the palace complain to the hospital about the incident”. “On the contrary, we offered our full and heartfelt support to the nurses involved and hospital staff at all times.”

In a statement outside the hospital, King Edward VII chief executive John Lofthouse said: “We can confirm that Jacintha was recently the victim of a hoax call to the hospital. “The hospital had been supporting her throughout this difficult time.”

He said Mrs Saldanha, who had worked at the hospital for more than four years, “was an excellent nurse and well-respected and popular with all of her colleagues”. “Everyone is shocked by the loss of a much loved and valued colleague,” he added.

Royal College of Nursing chief executive Dr Peter Carter, meanwhile, said it was “deeply saddening that a simple human error due to a cruel hoax could lead to the death of a dedicated and caring member of the nursing profession”

If the hospital had been that supportive, why is she dead? As for the cruel hoax, come on, if you’ve heard it, well it wasn’t exactly cruel, or even good enough to be a hoax.

The next question we have to ask is, why do we care about Will.I.Am Royal and his appointed wife being pregnant anyway. Hospitalised because of morning sickness, OMG is this really the most important news at the moment. Osbourne has just told you that austerity measures will last until 2018 at the earliest, and you are happy that they are producing another one to lord it over us.

Come on you bunch of Royal sycophants, stand up and demand they unlock some of their billions to refinance UK PLC made bankrupt by their globalist banker friends.

Oh, and one final thought, everyone scan the media over the next few months to see if  Kate is going to publicly promote the Whooping Cough Vaccine, and if she is, lets see them sticking that in her arm live on BBC news, after all, we want to make sure the future Royal baby is offered the same protection we are.